35544, Beaverton, Alabama COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 35544, Beaverton, Alabama is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.98 percent of the residents in 35544 has some form of health insurance. 43.83 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.45 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35544 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 53 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35544. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 231 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 396 health care providers accessible to residents in 35544, Beaverton, Alabama.

## COPD Score Analysis: Beaverton, Alabama (ZIP Code 35544) and Primary Care Landscape

Analyzing the COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) score for doctors in ZIP Code 35544, Beaverton, Alabama, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers factors impacting COPD management, including primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, and the integration of modern healthcare practices like telemedicine and mental health support. The goal is to assess the overall healthcare environment for COPD patients in this specific locale.

Beaverton, a small town, likely presents unique challenges and opportunities within its healthcare ecosystem. The first step is to assess the sheer number of primary care physicians (PCPs) practicing within the 35544 ZIP code. This number, relative to the population, will provide a crucial initial understanding of the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, could lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment for COPD patients. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility to primary care, a vital component of effective COPD management.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of these PCPs matters. Are they concentrated in a single clinic, or are they dispersed throughout the community? Centralized clinics might offer economies of scale and easier access to specialized equipment, but could also create logistical hurdles for patients with mobility issues. A dispersed network, while potentially offering greater convenience, might lack the same level of coordinated care. The geographic distribution of healthcare providers directly impacts patient access, especially in a rural setting like Beaverton.

The quality of primary care is paramount. This includes the experience and expertise of the physicians, as well as the availability of resources for COPD management. Do the primary care practices have dedicated respiratory therapists? Are spirometry tests, a crucial diagnostic tool for COPD, readily available? Do the practices actively participate in patient education programs, such as smoking cessation initiatives and COPD self-management training? Practices that excel in these areas will likely demonstrate a higher COPD score.

A critical element of the COPD score is the adoption of telemedicine. Telemedicine offers significant advantages for COPD patients, particularly those with mobility limitations or living in remote areas. Remote monitoring of vital signs, virtual consultations, and medication management support can all be facilitated through telemedicine platforms. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient access to care, reduce hospital readmissions, and enhance overall disease management. The degree of telemedicine integration is a key indicator of a practice's commitment to patient-centered care.

Mental health considerations are also crucial. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referral networks is therefore essential. Practices that integrate mental health services, either directly or through partnerships with mental health professionals, will likely demonstrate a higher COPD score. This integrated approach acknowledges the holistic needs of COPD patients.

Identifying standout practices within the 35544 ZIP code requires a deeper dive. This involves reviewing patient testimonials, analyzing online ratings and reviews, and assessing the practices' commitment to evidence-based COPD management guidelines. Practices that consistently receive positive feedback from patients, demonstrate high adherence to COPD treatment protocols, and actively engage in quality improvement initiatives are likely to be considered standout performers. These practices serve as models for others in the community.

Assessing the overall healthcare environment also requires an understanding of the availability of specialist care. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to pulmonologists and other specialists is often necessary, especially for patients with severe disease or complex medical needs. The proximity of specialist care, and the ease with which primary care physicians can refer patients, are important factors in the overall COPD score.

Another important aspect is the availability of support groups and community resources. COPD patients often benefit from peer support and educational programs. The presence of local support groups, smoking cessation programs, and access to respiratory rehabilitation services can significantly improve patient outcomes. Practices that actively connect patients with these resources demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive care.

The COPD score is not a static number; it is a dynamic reflection of the healthcare landscape. It is essential to regularly reassess the score, taking into account changes in physician availability, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolving needs of the patient population. This ongoing assessment ensures that the healthcare system remains responsive to the needs of COPD patients.

Evaluating the primary care landscape in Beaverton, Alabama, necessitates a thorough understanding of the local context. The small town setting presents both challenges and opportunities. The challenges might include limited access to specialists and specialized equipment. The opportunities might include a strong sense of community and the potential for close collaboration between healthcare providers.

In conclusion, the COPD score for doctors in ZIP Code 35544 and the primary care availability in Beaverton are complex and multifaceted. This analysis highlights the crucial factors to consider, from physician-to-patient ratios and the adoption of telemedicine to the availability of mental health resources and the presence of standout practices. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for improving COPD management and ensuring that patients receive the best possible care.

To visualize the healthcare landscape in Beaverton, Alabama, and gain a deeper understanding of physician distribution, patient demographics, and access to care, we recommend exploring the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome.