The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 35585, Spruce Pine, Alabama is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.14 percent of the residents in 35585 has some form of health insurance. 49.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.98 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35585 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 644 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35585. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 298 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 199 health care providers accessible to residents in 35585, Spruce Pine, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35585, Spruce Pine, Alabama
COPD Score | 19 |
---|---|
People Score | 63 |
Provider Score | 10 |
Hospital Score | 36 |
Travel Score | 34 |
35585 | Spruce Pine | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below assesses the quality of COPD care and primary care access within Spruce Pine, Alabama (ZIP Code 35585), focusing on physician availability, practice characteristics, and the integration of modern healthcare solutions. It does not provide a numerical "COPD Score" but rather a qualitative evaluation, considering various factors contributing to the overall quality of care for individuals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and seeking primary care services.
Spruce Pine, a rural community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. A crucial aspect of assessing care quality is the physician-to-patient ratio. Determining this ratio accurately requires data from various sources, including the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners, insurance providers, and local healthcare systems. The availability of primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and other specialists directly impacts access to timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of COPD. A low physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for specialists, can indicate potential barriers to care, such as longer wait times for appointments and increased travel distances.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. These include the adoption of evidence-based guidelines for COPD management, patient satisfaction scores, and the integration of comprehensive care models. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and proactively monitor patient health through regular check-ups and medication reviews are likely to provide superior care. Furthermore, practices that demonstrate a commitment to continuous quality improvement, such as participating in clinical trials or implementing innovative treatment strategies, should be recognized.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Spruce Pine. Telemedicine offers several advantages for COPD patients, including remote monitoring of vital signs, virtual consultations with specialists, and access to educational resources. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience, reduce travel burdens, and potentially enhance adherence to treatment plans. The availability of reliable internet access and the willingness of both patients and providers to utilize telemedicine platforms are crucial for its successful implementation.
Mental health is an often-overlooked aspect of COPD care. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its physical limitations, can lead to depression, anxiety, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient well-being. This may involve offering on-site counseling, providing referrals to mental health professionals, or incorporating mental health screenings into routine check-ups. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health specialists is essential for providing comprehensive and coordinated care.
Evaluating the resources available for COPD patients also includes assessing access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs. These programs provide supervised exercise, education, and support to help patients improve their lung function, manage their symptoms, and enhance their quality of life. The presence of a well-equipped and staffed pulmonary rehabilitation program within or near Spruce Pine is a significant indicator of the quality of COPD care available.
Furthermore, the availability of support groups and educational resources plays a vital role in empowering patients to manage their condition effectively. Support groups provide a platform for patients to share their experiences, learn from each other, and receive emotional support. Educational resources, such as pamphlets, websites, and workshops, can help patients understand their disease, learn about treatment options, and develop self-management skills.
The analysis of primary care availability in Spruce Pine must consider the number of primary care physicians, the types of services they offer, and their accessibility. This includes evaluating the practice's hours of operation, appointment availability, and acceptance of various insurance plans. Practices that offer extended hours, same-day appointments, and a wide range of services, such as preventative care, chronic disease management, and minor procedures, are likely to provide better access to primary care.
Another critical factor is the practice's commitment to patient-centered care. This involves actively listening to patients' concerns, involving them in decision-making, and providing individualized treatment plans. Practices that prioritize patient communication, offer clear explanations of medical information, and provide easy access to their medical records are more likely to foster positive patient-physician relationships.
In addition to the factors mentioned above, the analysis should consider the practice's use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs can improve care coordination, reduce medical errors, and enhance communication between providers. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively are better equipped to manage patient data, track progress, and provide comprehensive care.
Finally, evaluating the overall quality of care requires considering the practice's reputation within the community. This can be assessed through patient reviews, feedback from other healthcare providers, and the practice's involvement in community health initiatives. Practices that have a positive reputation and are actively engaged in improving the health of the community are likely to provide high-quality care.
In conclusion, assessing COPD care and primary care availability in Spruce Pine requires a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, examining mental health resources, and analyzing access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs and support services. The ability to provide comprehensive, coordinated, and patient-centered care is essential for improving the health and well-being of individuals with COPD and those seeking primary care in this rural community.
To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, physician locations, and other relevant data within ZIP Code 35585 and surrounding areas, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a detailed spatial representation of healthcare access and availability, aiding in a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Spruce Pine.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like