The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 36258, Delta, Alabama is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.88 percent of the residents in 36258 has some form of health insurance. 46.28 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.55 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36258 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 208 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36258. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 383 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 181 health care providers accessible to residents in 36258, Delta, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36258, Delta, Alabama
COPD Score | 55 |
---|---|
People Score | 79 |
Provider Score | 52 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 34 |
36258 | Delta | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**COPD Score Analysis: Primary Care and COPD Management in Delta, Alabama (ZIP Code 36258)**
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care services within Delta, Alabama (ZIP code 36258), focusing specifically on their capacity to manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). COPD management is a critical health concern, particularly in rural areas, where access to specialized care and resources can be limited. This report will assess the landscape of primary care physicians (PCPs), their patient-to-physician ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health support, and identify potential strengths and weaknesses in the local healthcare ecosystem. The ultimate goal is to provide a COPD Score assessment, reflecting the overall preparedness of the area to address the needs of individuals living with COPD.
The foundation of effective COPD management rests upon the availability of accessible and competent primary care. In Delta, the number of practicing PCPs is a crucial indicator. The physician-to-patient ratio is a key metric. A low ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and a potential decline in the quality of care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility and, potentially, improved outcomes for patients with chronic conditions like COPD. Specific numbers on the physician-to-patient ratio in 36258 are essential for a thorough assessment. This data will be a primary driver of the COPD Score.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care provided by the PCPs is vital. This includes their experience in managing COPD, their adherence to established clinical guidelines, and their ability to coordinate care with specialists, such as pulmonologists. Information on the training and certifications of local physicians, their participation in continuing medical education (CME) programs focused on respiratory health, and their affiliations with hospitals or specialty clinics are all critical factors. This information will help determine the quality component of the COPD Score.
The integration of telemedicine represents a significant advancement in healthcare delivery, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel, especially important for individuals with breathing difficulties. The adoption of telemedicine platforms by local PCPs in Delta is a positive sign. The extent of telemedicine adoption, including the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs), and the patient satisfaction with these services will directly influence the COPD Score.
COPD often coexists with mental health challenges, such as anxiety and depression. The availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting is therefore crucial. This includes access to mental health professionals (e.g., therapists, psychiatrists), the integration of mental health screenings into routine checkups, and the provision of support groups or educational programs. The presence of these resources, and their accessibility to patients with COPD, will significantly impact the COPD Score.
Identifying standout practices is a key element of this analysis. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality COPD care, utilizing innovative technologies, and prioritizing patient-centered care will be highlighted. These practices serve as models for other providers and can contribute to an overall improvement in the healthcare landscape. These practices will be a positive factor in the COPD Score.
The assessment of COPD care in Delta, Alabama, must also consider the availability of ancillary services. This includes access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs, respiratory therapists, and smoking cessation programs. The existence of these services, and their integration into the primary care system, can dramatically improve patient outcomes. The availability of these services will be factored into the COPD Score.
The COPD Score is a composite metric, calculated by considering several factors. These include the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by PCPs, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of ancillary services. Each factor is assigned a weight based on its importance in COPD management. The overall score provides a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare system's ability to meet the needs of individuals with COPD in Delta, Alabama.
The analysis will consider the challenges specific to a rural setting. These include geographic isolation, limited access to specialists, and socioeconomic factors that can affect health outcomes. The COPD Score will reflect these challenges and identify areas where targeted interventions are needed.
The final COPD Score will be presented as a numerical value, accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology used to calculate the score. The report will also include recommendations for improving COPD care in Delta, Alabama. These recommendations may include strategies for increasing the number of PCPs, expanding the use of telemedicine, enhancing mental health services, and promoting patient education and self-management.
The analysis will provide a clear and concise overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in Delta, Alabama, as it relates to COPD management. This information will be valuable for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members. The goal is to promote better health outcomes for individuals living with COPD in this rural community.
To gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and patient populations, explore CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps offer a visual representation of the data analyzed in this report, providing a powerful tool for understanding the complex interplay of factors that influence COPD care in Delta and the surrounding areas.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like