The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 06068, Salisbury, Connecticut is 60 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.51 percent of the residents in 06068 has some form of health insurance. 33.53 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06068 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 528 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06068. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 633 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 79 health care providers accessible to residents in 06068, Salisbury, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06068, Salisbury, Connecticut
COPD Score | 77 |
---|---|
People Score | 79 |
Provider Score | 60 |
Hospital Score | 60 |
Travel Score | 33 |
06068 | Salisbury | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Salisbury, CT (ZIP Code 06068)
Analyzing the quality of COPD care in Salisbury, Connecticut (ZIP code 06068) necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This analysis, a "COPD Score," considers factors impacting patient access, physician expertise, and the availability of supportive resources. It aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the landscape for individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease within this specific geographical area.
The foundation of any COPD care assessment rests on primary care availability. Salisbury, a relatively rural community, may face challenges in this regard. Evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. A low ratio, indicating fewer primary care physicians (PCPs) relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and less frequent follow-up care. The analysis needs to determine the number of active PCPs accepting new patients within the 06068 ZIP code, and the estimated patient population. This calculation provides an initial benchmark of access. Data from the Connecticut Department of Public Health and local hospital systems, such as Sharon Hospital, are crucial for this assessment.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is crucial. The COPD Score must evaluate the specific expertise of local PCPs. Are they board-certified in internal medicine or family medicine? Do they have a demonstrated interest or specialization in pulmonary health? Reviewing physician profiles on platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals can provide insights into patient satisfaction and perceived expertise. Furthermore, the presence of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who can provide valuable support in managing chronic conditions, should be factored into the equation.
The analysis also requires examining the availability of specialized pulmonary care. While primary care serves as the cornerstone, access to pulmonologists is essential for complex cases and advanced treatment. The presence of pulmonologists within the 06068 ZIP code or in nearby communities is critical. The distance patients need to travel for specialist consultations directly impacts their ability to manage their COPD effectively. This includes assessing the availability of pulmonary function testing (PFT) within the area.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical element. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telehealth, and its continued integration is vital for COPD management. Does the local healthcare infrastructure support virtual consultations for routine check-ups, medication management, and patient education? Practices that offer telemedicine options can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. The COPD Score should assess the number of practices offering telehealth and the types of services provided.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are integral to COPD management. Chronic respiratory conditions can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The COPD Score must investigate the availability of mental health services within the community. This includes assessing the presence of therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who specialize in treating patients with chronic illnesses. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health professionals is essential for holistic patient care.
Identifying standout practices within the 06068 ZIP code is a key component of the analysis. This requires a deeper dive into individual practices. Are there practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive COPD care? Do they offer patient education programs, support groups, or smoking cessation resources? Practices that actively engage in patient education, promote self-management strategies, and offer access to respiratory therapists deserve recognition. The COPD Score should highlight these exemplary practices.
The analysis must also consider the availability of respiratory therapy services. Respiratory therapists play a crucial role in managing COPD, providing breathing treatments, educating patients on proper inhaler techniques, and monitoring lung function. The presence of respiratory therapists within local hospitals, clinics, and home healthcare agencies is essential. The COPD Score should evaluate the accessibility of these services and the level of coordination between respiratory therapists and physicians.
Furthermore, the availability of rehabilitation programs is critical. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs, designed to improve lung function and overall quality of life, can significantly benefit COPD patients. The COPD Score should assess the presence of such programs within the community or in nearby areas. The program's accessibility, the qualifications of the staff, and the range of services offered should be considered.
The COPD Score should also evaluate the availability of emergency care resources. COPD exacerbations can be life-threatening, and timely access to emergency medical services is essential. The analysis should assess the proximity of local hospitals, the availability of emergency room services, and the responsiveness of emergency medical personnel.
Finally, the analysis must consider the social determinants of health. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and housing stability can significantly impact a patient's ability to manage their COPD. The COPD Score should acknowledge these factors and their potential influence on patient outcomes.
Ultimately, the COPD Score is not a static number but a dynamic assessment. It is a snapshot of the current healthcare landscape in Salisbury, CT, and should be regularly updated to reflect changes in physician availability, technological advancements, and evolving best practices in COPD management. This comprehensive analysis provides a valuable framework for improving COPD care within the community.
Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Salisbury, CT, and gain a deeper understanding of COPD care accessibility? Explore the power of geographic data with CartoChrome maps. Utilize our interactive mapping tools to identify healthcare providers, assess access to care, and visualize key demographic data. **Visit CartoChrome today and unlock the power of location intelligence for better healthcare decision-making.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like