The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 06479, Plantsville, Connecticut is 95 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.86 percent of the residents in 06479 has some form of health insurance. 32.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.43 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06479 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,846 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 49 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06479. An estimate of 20 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,198 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,930 health care providers accessible to residents in 06479, Plantsville, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06479, Plantsville, Connecticut
COPD Score | 97 |
---|---|
People Score | 66 |
Provider Score | 95 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 73 |
06479 | Plantsville | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Plantsville, CT (ZIP Code 06479) - Primary Care Landscape
Plantsville, Connecticut, nestled within ZIP Code 06479, presents a specific healthcare landscape for individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Evaluating the quality and accessibility of primary care physicians (PCPs) is crucial for these patients, as PCPs often serve as the central point for COPD management, coordinating specialist referrals, medication management, and lifestyle recommendations. This analysis provides a COPD Score assessment, considering factors relevant to COPD patients within the Plantsville area.
The foundation of this analysis lies in the availability of PCPs. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. While precise, up-to-the-minute ratios are difficult to obtain publicly, data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Connecticut Department of Public Health can provide estimates. A higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access. Plantsville’s score hinges on this, with a higher score if the ratio is favorable. The analysis would need to assess if the area is designated as a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA). If it is, this would negatively impact the COPD score.
The quality of care is equally important. This involves assessing the training and experience of PCPs in managing COPD. Board certifications in internal medicine or family medicine are a positive indicator. Furthermore, experience with pulmonary specialists and knowledge of the latest COPD treatment guidelines, including the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations, are crucial. This information is typically gleaned from physician profiles, practice websites, and patient reviews (with appropriate consideration for potential biases).
Standout practices in Plantsville would be those demonstrating a commitment to COPD management. These practices would likely have dedicated resources for COPD patients. This could include: specialized nurses or respiratory therapists, readily available spirometry testing, patient education programs, and strong partnerships with pulmonary specialists. Practices that proactively monitor patient adherence to medication regimens and provide regular follow-up appointments would also receive a higher score. The presence of patient portals and electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate communication and care coordination would also be considered.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, offers significant benefits for COPD patients, especially those with mobility limitations or residing in rural areas. Practices that offer telemedicine services for medication refills, symptom management, and routine check-ups would score higher. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as those that track oxygen saturation levels or peak flow, would further enhance the score. The ease of use and accessibility of telemedicine platforms are also essential considerations.
Mental health resources are often overlooked, but they are critical for COPD patients. COPD can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that screen for mental health issues and provide access to mental health professionals, either on-site or through referrals, would receive a higher score. Collaboration between PCPs and mental health providers is essential for comprehensive care. The availability of support groups and educational resources for patients and their families is also important.
Specific examples are difficult without a comprehensive, real-time data pull. However, a hypothetical scenario can illustrate the scoring process. Let's say "Plantsville Primary Care" is a practice with three PCPs, all board-certified in internal medicine. They offer spirometry testing on-site, have a dedicated nurse for COPD patient education, and utilize an EHR system with a patient portal. They also partner with a local pulmonary specialist and provide referrals to mental health services. This practice would likely receive a high COPD score. Conversely, a practice with fewer PCPs, limited resources, and no telemedicine options would receive a lower score.
Another consideration is the availability of specialized services. While PCPs are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to pulmonary specialists is vital. The proximity of pulmonologists and the ease of referral are important factors. The presence of local hospitals with respiratory therapy departments and pulmonary rehabilitation programs also contributes to the overall score.
The overall COPD score for Plantsville would be a composite of these factors, weighted according to their importance. The analysis would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by PCPs, the availability of specialized resources, the adoption of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health support. The final score would reflect the overall accessibility and quality of COPD care in the area. This score would be a snapshot in time, subject to change as healthcare practices evolve and new resources become available.
This analysis highlights the complexities of assessing healthcare access and quality. The information gathered is intended to provide a general overview of the landscape and to help patients make informed decisions about their care.
For a dynamic, visually-driven understanding of the healthcare landscape in Plantsville, including physician locations, specialist availability, and potential areas of need, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a more comprehensive and up-to-date view of the healthcare resources available in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like