20064, Washington, District of Columbia COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.99 percent of the residents in 20064 has some form of health insurance. 8.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 93.01 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20064 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 494 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 18 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20064. An estimate of 21 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 12,289 health care providers accessible to residents in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia.

The analysis below provides a hypothetical "COPD Score" assessment for primary care physicians within ZIP code 20064, a location in the Washington, D.C. area, and evaluates primary care availability across the broader Washington, D.C. region, considering factors pertinent to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. This assessment is based on publicly available information and hypothetical data, as a real-world COPD score would require access to patient records and specific clinical data.

The "COPD Score" is a composite metric, incorporating elements crucial for effective COPD care. These elements include physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialized pulmonary care, telemedicine integration, mental health support services, and overall accessibility of primary care within the designated area. The higher the score, the better the resources and accessibility for COPD patients.

**ZIP Code 20064: A Microcosm of COPD Care**

Focusing on ZIP code 20064, the analysis begins by examining the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio is a critical indicator of access to care. In an area with a high concentration of primary care physicians, patients are more likely to secure timely appointments and receive ongoing management for chronic conditions like COPD. Conversely, a low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. In this hypothetical scenario, we will assume that the physician-to-patient ratio in 20064 is average, with a moderate number of primary care providers serving the population.

Within 20064, the presence of specialized pulmonary care is also assessed. Proximity to pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and specialized clinics is vital for COPD patients. These specialists provide expert diagnosis, treatment plans, and ongoing monitoring. The availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs is also a key factor, as these programs offer structured exercise and education to improve lung function and quality of life. We will assume that 20064 has good access to pulmonary specialists, but limited availability of rehabilitation programs.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the "COPD Score." Telemedicine allows patients to receive consultations, follow-up appointments, and medication management remotely. This is especially beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those living in areas with limited access to in-person care. The extent to which primary care practices in 20064 utilize telemedicine platforms, including secure video conferencing and remote monitoring devices, is evaluated. We will assume that telemedicine adoption in 20064 is moderate, with some practices offering virtual appointments.

The integration of mental health resources is equally important. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychologists and psychiatrists, who specialize in chronic illness, is assessed. The integration of these services within primary care practices or through referral networks is also considered. We will assume that mental health resources in 20064 are somewhat limited, with a need for better integration with primary care.

Finally, the overall accessibility of primary care is evaluated. This includes factors such as appointment availability, insurance acceptance, and language accessibility. Practices that offer evening or weekend hours, accept a wide range of insurance plans, and have multilingual staff are given a higher score. We will assume that primary care in 20064 is generally accessible, but with some limitations in terms of evening hours and multilingual services.

**Primary Care Availability in Washington, D.C.: A Regional Perspective**

Expanding the analysis to the broader Washington, D.C. region, the assessment considers the overall availability of primary care services. This involves evaluating the distribution of physicians across different neighborhoods, the presence of underserved areas, and the availability of community health centers. The analysis will also consider the impact of healthcare disparities on COPD care.

The region's primary care landscape is diverse, with variations in physician density and access to care across different ZIP codes. The analysis will identify areas with high physician-to-patient ratios and those with shortages of primary care providers. It will also assess the impact of social determinants of health, such as income, education, and housing, on COPD outcomes.

The adoption of telemedicine across the region is also examined. The analysis will identify practices and health systems that have successfully implemented telemedicine programs and assess the impact of these programs on patient access and outcomes. The role of telehealth in reaching underserved populations and addressing health disparities is also considered.

The availability of mental health resources is another critical factor. The analysis will assess the integration of mental health services within primary care practices across the region. It will also evaluate the availability of specialized mental health services for patients with chronic illnesses. The analysis will consider the impact of mental health support on COPD management and patient outcomes.

The presence of standout practices and health systems is also noted. These practices may demonstrate excellence in COPD care through innovative programs, patient-centered approaches, and positive outcomes. The analysis will identify practices that have implemented best practices in COPD management, such as comprehensive patient education, proactive disease management, and integrated care models.

**Standout Practices and Areas for Improvement**

Based on the hypothetical data, the "COPD Score" for 20064 would be considered moderate, with strengths in access to pulmonary specialists but weaknesses in mental health integration and telemedicine adoption. The broader Washington, D.C. region shows a mixed picture, with some areas having excellent access to care and others facing significant challenges. Areas for improvement include increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, and improving the integration of mental health resources.

The assessment concludes that the Washington, D.C. region has a complex landscape of primary care availability, with both strengths and weaknesses in COPD care. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including increasing physician supply, expanding access to telemedicine, and strengthening the integration of mental health services.

**Call to Action**

To visualize the distribution of primary care resources, identify areas with high COPD prevalence, and map the availability of specialized services, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome.