COPD Score

20240, Washington, District of Columbia COPD Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20240 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20240 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20240. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,392 health care providers accessible to residents in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia.

Health Scores in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

COPD Score 65
People Score 1
Provider Score 100
Hospital Score 53
Travel Score 60

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

20240 Washington District of Columbia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

## COPD Score Analysis: Washington, DC (ZIP Code 20240) & Primary Care Landscape

This analysis assesses the quality of primary care available to patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Washington, DC, specifically focusing on the 20240 ZIP code, and then broadens the scope to encompass the overall primary care landscape within the District. The evaluation considers factors relevant to COPD management, including physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health resources, all crucial for comprehensive patient care. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses for individuals seeking care in this area.

ZIP Code 20240, encompassing a significant portion of the federal government, presents a unique healthcare demographic. While not solely residential, a considerable number of individuals working and potentially residing within this area require access to primary care. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental step. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the DC Department of Health provides estimates, but these figures often lack granularity. A comprehensive analysis would require more specific data, possibly obtained through surveys or partnerships with local healthcare providers, to accurately determine the number of primary care physicians actively serving the population within this ZIP code. This ratio directly impacts appointment availability and the potential for overburdened physicians, which can negatively affect the quality of care, especially for chronic conditions like COPD that require regular monitoring and management.

Within the 20240 ZIP code and the broader Washington, DC area, standout primary care practices are those demonstrating a commitment to excellence in COPD care. Identifying these practices involves evaluating several key indicators. Firstly, practices with a high percentage of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specialized training in respiratory medicine are highly desirable. Secondly, the adoption of evidence-based COPD management guidelines, such as those from the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), is crucial. This includes implementing standardized diagnostic procedures, such as spirometry, and offering comprehensive patient education programs. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and track patient outcomes, such as exacerbation rates and hospitalizations, demonstrate a proactive approach to COPD care.

Telemedicine adoption represents a significant factor in improving access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in underserved areas. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and medication management through telehealth platforms are better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for COPD patients, enabling them to receive regular check-ins, medication adjustments, and pulmonary rehabilitation support from the comfort of their homes. The availability of telehealth services can also reduce the burden on emergency rooms and hospitals, improving overall healthcare efficiency. The degree of telehealth integration varies significantly across practices, and identifying those with robust and patient-friendly telemedicine platforms is a key aspect of this analysis.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of chronic disease management, yet they are critical for COPD patients. COPD can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, primary care practices that integrate mental health services into their care model are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This includes having access to mental health professionals, such as psychologists or psychiatrists, either on-site or through referral networks. Practices that screen patients for mental health conditions and provide support groups or educational programs are also highly valued. The availability of these resources is a crucial indicator of a practice's commitment to comprehensive COPD care.

Expanding the analysis to encompass the broader primary care landscape in Washington, DC, reveals a complex environment with both strengths and weaknesses. The District boasts a high concentration of medical institutions and healthcare professionals, potentially offering a wide range of services. However, disparities in access to care exist, particularly for low-income individuals and those residing in underserved neighborhoods. The availability of primary care physicians varies across different areas of the city, and the quality of care can also differ significantly. Addressing these disparities requires a multi-faceted approach, including increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding access to affordable healthcare services, and promoting health equity initiatives.

The District’s healthcare system also faces challenges related to coordination of care. Effective COPD management requires seamless collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) and participate in care coordination programs are better equipped to facilitate this collaboration. The ability to share patient information securely and efficiently is essential for providing comprehensive and coordinated care. The degree to which practices are integrated into these systems is a key factor in assessing the overall quality of care.

Furthermore, the adoption of innovative technologies, such as remote monitoring devices and wearable sensors, can significantly enhance COPD management. These technologies enable physicians to track patient symptoms, monitor medication adherence, and provide timely interventions. Practices that embrace these technologies are at the forefront of COPD care, offering patients the opportunity to actively participate in their own health management. The integration of these technologies can also improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

In conclusion, the quality of COPD care in Washington, DC, and specifically within the 20240 ZIP code, is influenced by a complex interplay of factors. Physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and access to mental health resources all contribute to the overall quality of care. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the current healthcare landscape is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring that individuals with COPD receive the comprehensive care they need.

To gain a deeper understanding of the primary care landscape in Washington, DC, and to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to mental health services, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping tools available through CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, allowing them to make informed decisions and improve the delivery of care.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 20240, Washington, District of Columbia

You may also like

20245, Washington, District of Columbia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 0.41 Miles

Total Population:

20230, Washington, District of Columbia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 0.51 Miles

Total Population:

20204, Washington, District of Columbia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 0.74 Miles

Total Population:

20228, Washington, District of Columbia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 0.85 Miles

Total Population:

20202, Washington, District of Columbia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 1.39 Miles

Total Population:

20260, Washington, District of Columbia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 1.70 Miles

Total Population:

20190, Reston, Virginia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 16.73 Miles

Total Population:

20191, Reston, Virginia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 16.93 Miles

Total Population:

20194, Reston, Virginia
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 20240: 17.22 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 20240, Washington, District of Columbia