The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 20535, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20535 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20535 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20535. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 106 health care providers accessible to residents in 20535, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20535, Washington, District of Columbia
COPD Score | 66 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 100 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 61 |
20535 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20535 and Primary Care Availability in Washington
This analysis delves into the landscape of COPD care and primary care access, focusing on the specific context of ZIP Code 20535 and the broader Washington, D.C. area. We aim to evaluate the quality and availability of resources for individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), considering factors like physician density, practice characteristics, and the integration of innovative healthcare solutions. This analysis is intended to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the current system, highlighting areas for potential improvement.
ZIP Code 20535, encompassing the White House and surrounding areas, presents a unique demographic and healthcare environment. While the population within this specific ZIP code is relatively small, it is crucial to recognize that individuals residing here may have access to healthcare resources that extend beyond the immediate geographic boundaries. However, understanding the local availability of primary care physicians and specialists is essential for effective COPD management. The analysis will consider the physician-to-patient ratio, a critical indicator of access to care. A higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to better access, shorter wait times, and potentially more comprehensive care. Conversely, a lower ratio may indicate challenges in securing timely appointments and receiving consistent follow-up care, particularly vital for COPD patients.
Primary care availability in Washington, D.C., is a multifaceted issue. The District of Columbia, as a whole, experiences varying levels of access to primary care, with disparities often reflecting socioeconomic factors and geographic distribution. This analysis will consider the overall physician density within the city, comparing it to national averages to gauge relative access. Furthermore, it will examine the distribution of primary care practices, identifying areas where access is more readily available and areas where it may be limited. This includes an evaluation of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and other safety-net providers, which often play a crucial role in serving vulnerable populations, including those with COPD.
Standout practices within the Washington, D.C. area, and particularly those serving patients within or near ZIP Code 20535, will be identified based on their demonstrated commitment to COPD care. This evaluation will encompass several key criteria. First, the presence of board-certified pulmonologists or primary care physicians with specialized training in COPD management will be assessed. Second, the availability of comprehensive diagnostic and treatment services, including pulmonary function testing, respiratory therapy, and access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs, will be considered. Third, the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as adherence to national guidelines for COPD treatment and the use of patient education materials, will be evaluated. Finally, patient satisfaction and outcomes data, where available, will be factored into the assessment.
Telemedicine adoption is rapidly transforming healthcare delivery, offering significant benefits for COPD patients. Telemedicine can facilitate remote consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of vital signs, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits and improving access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. This analysis will examine the extent to which primary care practices and specialist clinics in the Washington, D.C. area have embraced telemedicine. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring programs, and the integration of telehealth platforms into existing care workflows. The focus will be on how these technologies are being utilized to improve COPD management and patient outcomes.
Mental health resources are a critical, often overlooked, aspect of COPD care. COPD can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to increased rates of anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, access to mental health services is essential for comprehensive COPD management. This analysis will assess the availability of mental health resources for COPD patients in the Washington, D.C. area. This includes evaluating the integration of mental health services within primary care practices and specialist clinics, the availability of mental health professionals with expertise in COPD, and the presence of support groups or other peer support programs. The goal is to understand how well the healthcare system addresses the psychological needs of COPD patients.
The assessment of practices in ZIP Code 20535 and the broader Washington, D.C. area will involve a multi-faceted approach. Data will be gathered from various sources, including publicly available information, healthcare directories, and patient reviews. The analysis will also incorporate insights from healthcare professionals and patient advocacy groups. The findings will be synthesized to create a comprehensive COPD score, reflecting the overall quality and availability of care. The score will consider factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized services, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources.
The final COPD score will provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It will highlight areas of strength and weakness in the current healthcare system, informing efforts to improve COPD care and access to services. The score will also serve as a benchmark for future improvements, allowing for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of progress. The ultimate goal is to create a healthcare environment that effectively addresses the needs of individuals living with COPD, promoting their overall health and well-being.
This analysis will strive to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape, recognizing that the quality of care can vary significantly across different practices and geographic locations. The information provided will be intended to inform, educate, and empower individuals to make informed decisions about their healthcare. The findings will also be used to advocate for policy changes that promote improved access to care and better outcomes for COPD patients.
For a detailed visual representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to care within ZIP Code 20535 and the surrounding Washington, D.C. area, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform provides valuable insights into healthcare resource distribution, helping you navigate the complexities of the healthcare system with greater clarity.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like