The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 30519, Buford, Georgia is 27 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.22 percent of the residents in 30519 has some form of health insurance. 22.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30519 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 14,738 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 77 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30519. An estimate of 10 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,747 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 15,492 health care providers accessible to residents in 30519, Buford, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30519, Buford, Georgia
COPD Score | 28 |
---|---|
People Score | 29 |
Provider Score | 27 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 63 |
30519 | Buford | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Buford, GA (ZIP Code 30519) – Primary Care Landscape
Analyzing the primary care landscape in Buford, Georgia (ZIP code 30519) through a "COPD Score" lens requires evaluating resources crucial for managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. This analysis focuses on accessibility, quality of care, and supportive services, specifically examining physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support within the community.
The core of effective COPD management hinges on accessible and responsive primary care. The physician-to-patient ratio in Buford is a critical indicator. While precise, up-to-the-minute figures fluctuate, publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) can provide a general understanding. A lower ratio (more physicians per capita) suggests better access. However, this data alone doesn't tell the whole story. Factors like insurance acceptance (Medicare, Medicaid, private), appointment wait times, and after-hours care availability significantly impact accessibility. Practices accepting a broad range of insurance plans and offering flexible scheduling options are inherently more valuable for COPD patients, who often require frequent check-ups and urgent care.
Several primary care practices in Buford likely stand out in terms of COPD care. Identifying these "standout" practices involves researching patient reviews, physician specializations, and the availability of pulmonary function testing (PFT) within the practice. Practices with board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with a strong interest in respiratory health are particularly beneficial. Additionally, practices employing respiratory therapists or offering in-house PFTs streamline the diagnostic and management process. These practices can provide a more comprehensive and coordinated approach to care, improving patient outcomes and reducing hospitalizations.
Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly vital role in COPD management, particularly in a geographically dispersed area like Buford. Practices utilizing telehealth platforms for virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring are better equipped to serve patients, especially those with mobility limitations or those residing outside of the immediate vicinity of a clinic. Telemedicine enables more frequent check-ins, allowing for proactive intervention and early detection of exacerbations. The presence of remote monitoring devices, such as those that track oxygen saturation or peak flow, can further enhance the effectiveness of telehealth by providing physicians with real-time data on patient’s condition.
Mental health is a crucial, yet often overlooked, aspect of COPD care. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its impact on breathing and daily activities, can lead to depression, anxiety, and social isolation. The availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referral networks is, therefore, essential. Practices that integrate mental health screenings, offer on-site counseling, or have established relationships with local therapists and support groups are better positioned to provide holistic care. This integrated approach helps address the psychological challenges associated with COPD, improving patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans.
The "COPD Score" for Buford, therefore, is not a single number but a complex assessment of these interconnected factors. A high score indicates a community with robust primary care access, practices specializing in respiratory care, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health support. Conversely, a low score suggests significant gaps in care, highlighting the need for improvements in physician availability, telehealth infrastructure, and mental health services. Regular updates to this analysis are critical, as the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving.
Specific practices should be identified through thorough research. For example, practices with a high volume of positive patient reviews mentioning respiratory care expertise, those actively promoting telemedicine services, and those explicitly advertising mental health integration should be highlighted. Conversely, practices with limited online presence, long wait times, or a lack of information regarding respiratory care specialization would warrant further investigation.
The assessment of primary care availability extends beyond the number of physicians. The distribution of practices throughout the ZIP code, the availability of transportation options for patients, and the presence of community health centers all influence the overall accessibility of care. Analyzing these factors provides a more nuanced understanding of the community’s ability to support COPD patients.
Furthermore, the availability of educational resources for patients is another crucial element. Practices that provide educational materials on COPD management, smoking cessation programs, and pulmonary rehabilitation services contribute significantly to patient empowerment and self-management. These resources equip patients with the knowledge and skills they need to actively participate in their care, leading to improved outcomes.
The quality of care is also influenced by the use of evidence-based practices and adherence to clinical guidelines. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, track patient outcomes, and regularly update their protocols based on the latest research are better equipped to provide optimal care. This commitment to quality ensures that patients receive the most effective and up-to-date treatments.
In conclusion, assessing the "COPD Score" for Buford, GA (ZIP code 30519) is a dynamic process that requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, a comprehensive picture of the primary care landscape emerges. This analysis identifies strengths and weaknesses, guiding efforts to improve COPD care within the community.
Ready to visualize the primary care landscape in Buford and beyond? Explore the power of location intelligence with CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of physician distribution, practice locations, and patient demographics.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like