The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 40006, Bedford, Kentucky is 21 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.66 percent of the residents in 40006 has some form of health insurance. 47.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.48 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 40006 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,154 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 40006. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 869 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 511 health care providers accessible to residents in 40006, Bedford, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 40006, Bedford, Kentucky
COPD Score | 16 |
---|---|
People Score | 21 |
Provider Score | 21 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 52 |
40006 | Bedford | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 40006 and Primary Care Availability in Bedford, Kentucky**
This analysis examines the landscape of primary care and COPD management within ZIP code 40006 (Bedford, Kentucky) and the broader context of primary care availability in the area. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to patients, focusing on factors crucial for effective COPD care. This includes physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, all contributing to a hypothetical “COPD Score” assessment. This score isn't a standardized metric but represents a qualitative evaluation based on the available data and insights.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Bedford, Kentucky, warrants careful consideration. While specific, up-to-the-minute numbers are dynamic and difficult to ascertain without direct access to real-time provider databases, the general trends are important. Rural areas often face challenges in attracting and retaining physicians, potentially leading to higher patient-to-doctor ratios compared to urban centers. This can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised access to specialized care, which is crucial for COPD management. The availability of pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and other specialists is also a critical factor, and their presence or absence significantly impacts the COPD Score.
Evaluating individual practices within 40006 reveals further complexities. Some practices may stand out due to their commitment to COPD care. These "standout practices" might offer comprehensive pulmonary function testing, patient education programs, and readily available respiratory therapists. They might also participate in clinical trials or research related to COPD, demonstrating a commitment to staying at the forefront of treatment advancements. The presence of dedicated COPD clinics or specialized programs within a practice would significantly elevate its contribution to the overall COPD Score. Conversely, practices with limited resources, high patient volumes, and less emphasis on chronic disease management would likely contribute less favorably to the score.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical aspect of this analysis. Telemedicine offers several benefits for COPD patients, including remote monitoring of vital signs, virtual consultations, and access to educational resources. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas. This can lead to earlier interventions, better adherence to treatment plans, and improved overall outcomes. The integration of telemedicine into a practice’s workflow would positively impact the COPD Score, while a lack of telemedicine infrastructure would negatively affect it.
Mental health resources are frequently overlooked in COPD care, but their importance cannot be overstated. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this and offer access to mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. The availability of mental health support, coupled with patient education about the link between mental health and COPD, would be a significant positive factor in the COPD Score. Conversely, a lack of attention to mental health needs would detract from the overall score.
The hypothetical COPD Score, therefore, is a composite of these factors. A practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, a dedicated COPD program, robust telemedicine capabilities, and readily available mental health support would receive a higher score. Conversely, a practice with a high patient load, limited resources, a lack of telemedicine, and no mental health support would receive a lower score. The overall score for the 40006 ZIP code would be a reflection of the collective strengths and weaknesses of the practices within the area.
In Bedford, Kentucky, the overall availability of primary care, beyond the specifics of COPD management, also affects the COPD Score. If the general supply of primary care physicians is limited, it can create a bottleneck, making it harder for patients to access any type of care, including specialized COPD care. The presence of urgent care clinics and other alternative care providers can help alleviate some of this pressure, but the availability of a strong primary care base is essential for effective chronic disease management.
Further investigation into specific practices within 40006 would involve examining their websites, contacting them directly, and reviewing patient testimonials (where available). This would provide more detailed information about their services, staffing, and patient satisfaction. Public health data, such as hospital readmission rates for COPD patients, could also provide valuable insights into the quality of care provided in the area. The analysis would also consider the availability of support groups, community resources, and patient education programs.
The analysis would also need to consider the patient population itself. Factors like the age distribution of the population, the prevalence of smoking, and the socioeconomic status of residents can all influence the demand for and the effectiveness of COPD care. Areas with a higher prevalence of smoking or a larger elderly population may require more resources dedicated to COPD management.
The dynamic nature of healthcare means that this analysis is a snapshot in time. Physician availability, practice offerings, and technological advancements are constantly evolving. Regular updates and revisions would be necessary to maintain an accurate assessment of the COPD care landscape in Bedford, Kentucky.
In conclusion, assessing the COPD Score for doctors in 40006 and primary care availability in Bedford is a multifaceted undertaking. It requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the resources available to COPD patients and to identify areas for improvement. The hypothetical COPD Score, while not a standardized metric, serves as a valuable tool for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
**To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Bedford, Kentucky, and explore the distribution of healthcare resources, we invite you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that can help you visualize physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data, providing a valuable resource for patients and healthcare professionals alike.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like