The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 01379, Wendell, Massachusetts is 81 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.70 percent of the residents in 01379 has some form of health insurance. 52.14 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01379 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 130 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01379. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 209 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 117 health care providers accessible to residents in 01379, Wendell, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 01379, Wendell, Massachusetts
COPD Score | 80 |
---|---|
People Score | 43 |
Provider Score | 81 |
Hospital Score | 74 |
Travel Score | 41 |
01379 | Wendell | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Wendell, MA (ZIP Code 01379)
This analysis focuses on assessing the availability and quality of care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients within ZIP code 01379, encompassing the town of Wendell, Massachusetts. The evaluation considers factors relevant to COPD management, including physician access, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, aiming to provide a comprehensive "COPD Score" perspective. This score isn't a single numerical value but rather a holistic assessment based on the interplay of these elements.
Wendell, MA, is a small, rural community. Its demographic profile likely includes a significant elderly population, a group particularly susceptible to COPD. This necessitates a careful examination of healthcare resources to ensure adequate support for those living with this chronic respiratory illness. The analysis begins with an assessment of primary care physician (PCP) availability, a critical first point of contact for COPD diagnosis, management, and referral.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator. In rural areas, this ratio often presents a challenge. Determining the exact ratio for Wendell requires data from sources like the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine and potentially the US Census Bureau for population estimates. A low physician-to-patient ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potentially, delayed diagnosis or treatment. The analysis must consider the proximity of neighboring towns and cities, as residents might seek care outside of Wendell.
Beyond raw numbers, the type of primary care practices available in and around Wendell is crucial. Are the practices solo practices, small group practices, or part of a larger healthcare system? Larger systems often have greater resources, including access to specialists, diagnostic equipment, and support staff. This can translate to better COPD management through integrated care pathways. The analysis should identify any practices that are part of larger networks, highlighting the potential benefits of this affiliation.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for COPD patients, offering remote monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management. Examining which practices in the area offer telemedicine services, and the types of services provided, is essential. Do they offer virtual check-ups, remote pulmonary function testing monitoring, or patient education programs via telehealth? Practices actively embracing telemedicine are likely to provide more accessible and convenient care for COPD patients.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. This involves looking at factors beyond basic service offerings. Are any practices actively participating in COPD-specific quality improvement initiatives? Do they have a strong track record of patient satisfaction, as evidenced by patient reviews or surveys? Do they employ specialized staff, such as respiratory therapists or certified asthma educators? Practices demonstrating a commitment to COPD care through these initiatives would be considered "standout" and contribute positively to the overall COPD Score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critically important for COPD patients. COPD can significantly impact quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The analysis must assess the availability of mental health services within the primary care practices themselves, or through referrals to external providers. Do the practices have integrated behavioral health specialists? Do they offer counseling services or support groups specifically for patients with chronic respiratory conditions? The presence and accessibility of these resources are crucial for comprehensive COPD management.
The analysis also needs to consider the availability of pulmonary specialists. While PCPs are the primary point of contact, COPD often requires the expertise of pulmonologists. The proximity of pulmonologists, and the ease with which PCPs can refer patients to them, is a significant factor. This involves assessing the referral pathways and the wait times for appointments with specialists.
Furthermore, the analysis should examine the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. These programs, which combine exercise, education, and support, are proven to improve lung function and quality of life for COPD patients. Identifying the nearest pulmonary rehabilitation programs and assessing their accessibility is crucial.
The COPD Score, therefore, is not a simple metric. It is a composite assessment, weighing the factors discussed above. A high score would indicate a community with a robust primary care infrastructure, readily available telemedicine options, integrated mental health services, and easy access to pulmonary specialists and rehabilitation programs. A low score would highlight areas needing improvement, such as a shortage of PCPs, limited telemedicine adoption, or a lack of mental health support.
The specific practices in Wendell, and the surrounding areas, need to be individually assessed. This requires collecting data from various sources, including healthcare provider directories, insurance company websites, and patient reviews. The findings should be synthesized to provide a comprehensive picture of the COPD care landscape.
This detailed assessment is intended to provide a clear understanding of the current state of COPD care in Wendell, MA. The analysis should highlight both strengths and weaknesses, ultimately helping to identify areas where resources can be improved to better serve the needs of COPD patients. The data collected will inform the creation of a detailed map, highlighting the geographical distribution of resources.
To visualize this information, and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Wendell and the surrounding areas, we recommend exploring the interactive maps available from CartoChrome. These maps can help you visualize physician locations, practice specializations, and resource availability, providing a valuable tool for both patients and healthcare providers.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like