The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 01451, Harvard, Massachusetts is 83 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 99.64 percent of the residents in 01451 has some form of health insurance. 18.35 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 93.78 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01451 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,419 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01451. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 865 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 726 health care providers accessible to residents in 01451, Harvard, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 01451, Harvard, Massachusetts
COPD Score | 91 |
---|---|
People Score | 83 |
Provider Score | 83 |
Hospital Score | 25 |
Travel Score | 73 |
01451 | Harvard | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Physicians and Primary Care in Harvard, MA (ZIP Code 01451)
This analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of primary care resources and their suitability for individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) within the Harvard, Massachusetts (ZIP Code 01451) area. The evaluation considers factors crucial for effective COPD management, including physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health support, all of which contribute to a "COPD Score" that reflects the overall quality and accessibility of care.
The foundation of effective COPD care lies in the availability of qualified primary care physicians. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. While precise, real-time data fluctuates, the average physician-to-population ratio within 01451, and the surrounding areas, should be examined. A higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access. However, this ratio alone is insufficient. The *type* of physicians is also important. Are there enough board-certified family medicine or internal medicine physicians? Do pulmonologists, specialists crucial for COPD management, have readily available appointment slots? The analysis considers the proximity of these specialists to Harvard residents, factoring in travel time and ease of access. A low COPD Score is assigned if specialists are far away or unavailable.
Beyond simple physician numbers, the characteristics of local primary care practices significantly impact the COPD Score. Are practices accepting new patients? This is a fundamental aspect of access. The analysis assesses the size of practices. Larger practices may offer a broader range of services and potentially more appointment availability, but smaller practices might provide more personalized care. The availability of on-site diagnostic tools, such as pulmonary function testing (PFT), directly impacts COPD management. Practices with these capabilities receive a higher score, as they facilitate quicker diagnosis and monitoring. The presence of dedicated COPD education programs, or respiratory therapists, is also considered, as these resources empower patients to manage their condition effectively.
Telemedicine adoption is a key component of the COPD Score. The ability to consult with a physician remotely, especially for follow-up appointments or medication adjustments, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those living in rural areas. Practices with robust telemedicine platforms, including video conferencing capabilities and secure messaging systems, receive a higher score. The analysis examines the types of telemedicine services offered (e.g., virtual check-ups, remote monitoring of vital signs) and the ease of use for patients. A low score is given if telemedicine options are absent or poorly implemented.
The impact of mental health on COPD is well-documented. Depression and anxiety are common comorbidities, and effective management of these conditions is crucial for overall well-being and adherence to treatment plans. The analysis assesses the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referrals. Practices with integrated behavioral health services, or established partnerships with local mental health providers, receive a higher score. The presence of therapists, psychiatrists, or access to support groups for COPD patients is a significant positive factor. A low score is given if there is a lack of these resources.
The standout practices in 01451, if any, are identified based on the criteria above. These practices demonstrate excellence in physician availability, comprehensive services, telemedicine integration, and mental health support. Specific examples of practices that excel in these areas are highlighted, recognizing their commitment to providing high-quality COPD care. The analysis considers patient reviews and testimonials, where available, to gauge patient satisfaction and the overall experience of receiving care.
The COPD Score is not a static number. It's a dynamic assessment influenced by various factors. The analysis considers the location of pharmacies that specialize in respiratory medication, and the availability of home healthcare services, which can be crucial for managing COPD exacerbations. The analysis also acknowledges the role of community resources, such as support groups, and educational programs offered by local hospitals or health organizations. The score is adjusted based on the accessibility of these resources to Harvard residents.
The overall COPD Score for the 01451 area is a reflection of the combined factors. It is a relative measure, comparing the resources available in Harvard to those in other areas. The score is intended to provide residents with an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape. It is designed to help patients make informed decisions about their care. The analysis offers insights into the areas where improvements are needed.
To visualize the geographic distribution of primary care physicians, specialists, pharmacies, and community resources, and to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in the 01451 area, we recommend using CartoChrome maps. Explore the interactive visualizations to see the distribution of resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like