02743, Acushnet, Massachusetts COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 02743, Acushnet, Massachusetts is 56 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 99.82 percent of the residents in 02743 has some form of health insurance. 40.47 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02743 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,018 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02743. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,270 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,091 health care providers accessible to residents in 02743, Acushnet, Massachusetts.

## COPD Score Analysis: Primary Care in Acushnet (ZIP Code 02743)

This analysis delves into the landscape of primary care in Acushnet, Massachusetts (ZIP Code 02743), focusing on factors relevant to patients managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of access, quality, and resources available to individuals living with this chronic respiratory condition. The assessment considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized COPD care, telemedicine adoption, and integration of mental health services, all crucial elements in effective COPD management.

The physician-to-patient ratio in Acushnet, while not a definitive indicator of care quality, significantly impacts access. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced opportunities for preventative care and consistent monitoring, both critical for COPD patients. Publicly available data from sources like the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine and the US Census Bureau needs to be analyzed to calculate this ratio accurately. The number of practicing primary care physicians within the ZIP code is essential. The population of Acushnet is then divided by this number to determine the physician-to-patient ratio. A lower ratio is generally considered more favorable for patient access.

Identifying standout practices within Acushnet requires a multi-faceted approach. This involves examining factors such as the availability of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specific COPD expertise. Practices with dedicated respiratory therapists or specialized COPD clinics should be noted. Patient reviews, accessible through platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, provide valuable insights into patient experiences, including satisfaction with communication, appointment scheduling, and the overall quality of care. Examining the services offered, such as pulmonary function testing (PFTs) or access to smoking cessation programs, is also vital. The presence of a practice that offers comprehensive COPD management, including regular check-ups, medication management, and patient education, would be a significant advantage.

Telemedicine has emerged as a crucial tool in modern healthcare, particularly for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Its adoption within Acushnet’s primary care practices is a critical factor. Practices offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and online patient portals demonstrate a commitment to accessible and convenient care. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for COPD patients, allowing for regular check-ins, medication adjustments, and symptom management without requiring frequent in-person visits. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as pulse oximeters, which can be used to track oxygen saturation levels, further enhances the effectiveness of telemedicine in managing COPD.

The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. Patients with COPD often experience anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges due to the chronic nature of their illness and the impact on their daily lives. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is essential. Practices that offer on-site mental health professionals, such as therapists or counselors, or have established referral networks to mental health specialists, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The availability of support groups, both in-person and virtual, can also provide valuable emotional support and peer-to-peer learning opportunities for COPD patients.

A comprehensive COPD Score for primary care in Acushnet would reflect the weighted importance of each of these factors. The physician-to-patient ratio should be considered, with a lower ratio receiving a higher score. The presence of specialized COPD care, including board-certified pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and dedicated clinics, should also be heavily weighted. The adoption of telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, should contribute significantly to the score. Finally, the integration of mental health resources, such as on-site therapists or referral networks, should be considered a crucial element.

The methodology for calculating the COPD Score would involve assigning numerical values to each factor, based on its relative importance. The factors would then be weighted, and a final score would be calculated. For example, a practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, a pulmonologist on staff, robust telemedicine capabilities, and integrated mental health services would receive a high score. Conversely, a practice with limited resources and a high physician-to-patient ratio would receive a lower score. This COPD Score would provide a valuable tool for patients seeking primary care in Acushnet, helping them to identify practices that are best equipped to meet their specific needs.

Further analysis should also include an assessment of the availability of resources such as smoking cessation programs, pulmonary rehabilitation services, and access to durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers. These resources are essential for comprehensive COPD management and should be considered in the overall assessment. The score should be dynamic, reflecting changes in physician availability, practice offerings, and the adoption of new technologies. This dynamic approach will ensure that the COPD Score remains relevant and useful for patients seeking the best possible care.

In conclusion, assessing the primary care landscape in Acushnet for COPD patients requires a comprehensive evaluation of multiple factors. From physician-to-patient ratios to telemedicine adoption and mental health integration, each element plays a crucial role in determining the quality and accessibility of care. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the key considerations and developing a robust COPD Score that can empower patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare.

Do you want to visualize the primary care landscape in Acushnet and explore the locations of practices, physician density, and access to resources? CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive view of this information. Explore the power of data visualization and gain a deeper understanding of healthcare access in your community. Visit CartoChrome maps today.