The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 38731, Chatham, Mississippi is 15 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 38731 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38731 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38731. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 65 health care providers accessible to residents in 38731, Chatham, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 38731, Chatham, Mississippi
COPD Score | 34 |
---|---|
People Score | 51 |
Provider Score | 15 |
Hospital Score | 52 |
Travel Score | 52 |
38731 | Chatham | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis examines the availability and quality of COPD care within the specified geographic areas, focusing on primary care physicians (PCPs) and related resources. We will assess the situation in ZIP Code 38731, and then compare it to the primary care landscape in Chatham, aiming to provide a COPD Score assessment.
**COPD Score Analysis: ZIP Code 38731**
The provision of adequate COPD care in ZIP Code 38731 requires a multifaceted approach, encompassing the availability of PCPs, specialized pulmonologists, access to diagnostic tools, and support services. The initial assessment focuses on the number of PCPs per capita. A low physician-to-patient ratio can significantly hinder access to timely diagnosis and management of COPD. Accurate data on the population of 38731, combined with the number of actively practicing PCPs, is essential to calculate this ratio. Furthermore, it's crucial to determine the number of pulmonologists serving this area, as they are critical for advanced COPD management.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. This involves evaluating the practices of individual physicians and clinics. Are they adhering to the latest COPD guidelines, such as those from the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)? Do they offer comprehensive pulmonary function testing (PFTs), including spirometry, to diagnose and monitor the disease? Do they provide patient education on smoking cessation, inhaler techniques, and disease management strategies? Identifying standout practices within 38731 requires research into patient reviews, practice accreditations, and physician qualifications.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, especially in rural areas, and provide access to specialist consultations, remote monitoring, and virtual support groups. Assessing the extent to which PCPs in 38731 utilize telemedicine for COPD management is crucial. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices (e.g., pulse oximeters), and online educational resources.
Mental health is inextricably linked to COPD. The chronic nature of the disease, its impact on breathing, and the potential for social isolation can lead to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within 38731 is a key component of the COPD Score. This includes assessing the availability of mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) who specialize in chronic illness, as well as the existence of support groups and counseling services.
**COPD Score Analysis: Primary Care Availability in Chatham**
Comparing the situation in Chatham requires a similar, yet distinct, approach. While the core elements of the COPD Score remain the same, the context may differ. Chatham's population density, geographic layout, and healthcare infrastructure will influence the assessment. The physician-to-patient ratio in Chatham needs to be calculated, comparing it to the 38731 ratio to identify potential disparities in access.
The quality of care in Chatham should be evaluated using similar criteria to those used for 38731. This involves assessing the adherence to COPD guidelines, the availability of diagnostic tools, and the provision of patient education. However, the specific practices and clinics in Chatham need to be researched and evaluated independently.
The adoption of telemedicine in Chatham also needs to be assessed. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and online educational resources. Chatham might have a different level of telemedicine adoption compared to 38731, depending on factors like internet access and physician willingness to embrace technology.
The availability of mental health resources in Chatham is crucial. The assessment should focus on the number of mental health professionals specializing in chronic illness, the availability of support groups, and counseling services. The comparison of mental health resources between Chatham and 38731 can reveal differences in support for COPD patients.
**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**
The comparison between 38731 and Chatham necessitates a holistic view. The COPD Score will be determined by evaluating the physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by PCPs and specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The scores will be relative, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each area.
This analysis is designed to provide a comprehensive overview of COPD care. Further investigation, including direct contact with healthcare providers and patient surveys, would be required to refine these scores. The final COPD Score will provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to understand the landscape of COPD care and identify areas for improvement.
For a detailed, interactive map visualizing the availability of primary care physicians, specialists, and healthcare resources in these and other areas, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides a powerful platform for visualizing and analyzing geographic data, enabling a deeper understanding of healthcare access and disparities. Explore CartoChrome maps today to see the data come to life.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like