The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 38855, Mantachie, Mississippi is 81 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.39 percent of the residents in 38855 has some form of health insurance. 35.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.21 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38855 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,305 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38855. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 882 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 27 health care providers accessible to residents in 38855, Mantachie, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 38855, Mantachie, Mississippi
COPD Score | 50 |
---|---|
People Score | 38 |
Provider Score | 81 |
Hospital Score | 19 |
Travel Score | 55 |
38855 | Mantachie | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Mantachie, Mississippi (ZIP Code 38855)
Mantachie, Mississippi, nestled within the 38855 ZIP code, presents a unique challenge when considering chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians, the quality of COPD care, and the integration of modern healthcare solutions within the community. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "COPD Score" assessment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
The foundation of effective COPD management rests upon accessible and competent primary care. In Mantachie, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. While precise figures fluctuate, rural areas often face shortages. A lower ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. This scarcity can disproportionately affect COPD patients, who require frequent monitoring and management. The COPD score for this factor would be affected by the ratio.
Evaluating primary care availability necessitates examining the geographical distribution of practices. Are clinics clustered in one area, leaving others underserved? Travel distance becomes a significant barrier for patients with breathing difficulties. Public transportation options, or lack thereof, further complicate access. The COPD score must consider these factors.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This involves assessing the expertise of physicians in COPD diagnosis and treatment. Are physicians up-to-date on the latest guidelines and treatment options? Do they have experience managing complex cases? Are they proficient in spirometry and other diagnostic tools? The COPD score should weigh these aspects.
Standout practices within the 38855 ZIP code deserve recognition. Identifying clinics that demonstrate a commitment to COPD care, such as those offering specialized pulmonary rehabilitation programs or dedicated COPD nurse educators, would boost their score. These practices often serve as models for others, demonstrating best practices in patient management and education.
Telemedicine, a rapidly evolving field, offers significant potential for improving COPD care in rural areas. Remote monitoring devices, virtual consultations, and online educational resources can bridge geographical gaps and provide patients with convenient access to care. Practices embracing telemedicine would receive a higher score. The COPD score would be affected by the adoption of telemedicine.
Mental health considerations are integral to COPD management. Living with a chronic respiratory illness can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Access to mental health services, including therapy and support groups, is crucial for overall well-being. The COPD score should assess the availability of these resources within the community.
The availability of specialized pulmonary care is another critical factor. While primary care physicians are the frontline providers, access to pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and other specialists is essential for managing complex cases and providing advanced treatments. The COPD score should reflect the proximity and availability of these specialists.
Patient education and self-management programs are vital components of COPD care. These programs empower patients to take an active role in managing their condition, improving their quality of life and reducing hospitalizations. Practices that prioritize patient education and offer readily accessible resources would receive a higher score. The COPD score would reflect the availability of patient education.
The COPD score also considers the availability of resources like smoking cessation programs. Smoking is a primary cause of COPD, and helping patients quit is crucial for preventing disease progression. The score would evaluate the presence and effectiveness of these programs within the community.
The integration of technology is another area to consider. Electronic health records (EHRs) can improve care coordination and facilitate data sharing among providers. The COPD score will assess the extent to which practices utilize EHRs and other technologies to enhance patient care.
Financial considerations also impact COPD management. The cost of medications, inhalers, and other treatments can be a significant burden for patients. The COPD score should reflect the availability of financial assistance programs and resources to help patients afford their medications.
The COPD score is not a static number. It is a dynamic assessment that should be updated regularly to reflect changes in healthcare delivery and patient needs. The score should be used to identify areas for improvement and to guide efforts to enhance COPD care in Mantachie.
In conclusion, the COPD score for the 38855 ZIP code is a complex assessment that considers a multitude of factors. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of specialized pulmonary care all play critical roles. While Mantachie may face challenges common to rural areas, there are opportunities to improve COPD care through strategic investments in healthcare infrastructure, provider training, and patient education.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Mantachie, including the distribution of healthcare providers and the availability of resources, consider exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform can provide valuable insights into the geographic accessibility of care and help identify areas where improvements are most needed.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like