The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 39066, Edwards, Mississippi is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.33 percent of the residents in 39066 has some form of health insurance. 50.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.66 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39066 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,529 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39066. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 963 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 694 health care providers accessible to residents in 39066, Edwards, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39066, Edwards, Mississippi
COPD Score | 5 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 11 |
Hospital Score | 26 |
Travel Score | 19 |
39066 | Edwards | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Edwards, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39066)
Analyzing the availability of quality primary care, especially concerning the management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), within Edwards, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39066) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of COPD care. The ultimate goal is to provide a COPD Score assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.
Edwards, a small community, likely faces challenges common to rural areas: limited healthcare infrastructure, potential physician shortages, and difficulties in accessing specialized care. The COPD Score will reflect these realities, providing a nuanced understanding of the resources available to individuals managing this chronic respiratory illness.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratios:**
A critical factor in determining the accessibility of primary care is the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric reveals the number of patients each physician is responsible for, providing an initial gauge of potential wait times, appointment availability, and overall access to care. Data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and state medical boards will be essential to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP Code 39066. A high ratio, indicating a shortage of physicians, would negatively impact the COPD Score. Conversely, a low ratio would suggest better access to care, positively influencing the score.
Beyond the raw numbers, the types of physicians available are also crucial. The presence of board-certified pulmonologists, or at least primary care physicians with specialized training in respiratory medicine, would be a significant advantage. Their expertise is vital for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment plans, and ongoing management of COPD. The availability of these specialists directly impacts the ability of patients to receive timely and appropriate care.
**Standout Practices:**
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several key criteria. This includes the presence of dedicated COPD programs, offering comprehensive care encompassing pulmonary function testing, medication management, and patient education. Practices that prioritize patient education, providing resources on disease management, smoking cessation, and lifestyle modifications, would score favorably.
Reviews from patients, accessible through online platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, provide valuable insights into the quality of care. Positive patient experiences, reflecting compassionate care, effective communication, and positive outcomes, contribute to a higher COPD Score. Furthermore, the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as adherence to national guidelines for COPD management, demonstrates a commitment to quality care.
**Telemedicine Adoption:**
Telemedicine offers a promising solution to address the challenges of healthcare access in rural areas. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, remotely monitor patients' conditions, and provide medication management via telehealth platforms can significantly improve COPD care. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring tools, will receive a higher score.
The integration of telemedicine into COPD care can also facilitate access to specialists who may not be readily available in Edwards. Remote consultations with pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and other specialists can provide patients with expert guidance and support. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as pulse oximeters and peak flow meters, allows for proactive management of COPD symptoms and early intervention when necessary.
**Mental Health Resources:**
COPD can significantly impact mental health. The chronic nature of the disease, the physical limitations it imposes, and the associated anxiety and depression can severely affect a patient's quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of the COPD Score assessment.
The presence of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, within the local healthcare system is essential. Ideally, these professionals should have experience in treating individuals with chronic illnesses. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices, allowing for seamless access to mental health support, would be highly beneficial. The availability of support groups and educational resources focused on managing the psychological aspects of COPD also contributes to a higher score.
**COPD Score Conclusion:**
The COPD Score for Edwards, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39066) is ultimately a reflection of the community's capacity to provide comprehensive and accessible care to individuals living with COPD. This analysis considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources.
A high COPD Score indicates a robust healthcare system capable of effectively managing COPD, while a low score highlights areas needing improvement. The specific score will depend on the data gathered and the weighting assigned to each factor. It is important to remember that this score is a snapshot in time and can change as the healthcare landscape evolves.
The insights gained from this analysis can be used to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members about the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. This information can be used to develop targeted interventions to improve COPD care, such as recruiting more physicians, expanding telemedicine services, and increasing access to mental health resources.
**Call to Action:**
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Edwards, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39066), including the location of healthcare providers, the distribution of resources, and potential areas for improvement, explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually represent the data analyzed in this report, providing a powerful tool for understanding and improving COPD care in Edwards.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like