The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 39175, Utica, Mississippi is 9 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.45 percent of the residents in 39175 has some form of health insurance. 48.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.47 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39175 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 582 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39175. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 938 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 158 health care providers accessible to residents in 39175, Utica, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39175, Utica, Mississippi
COPD Score | 7 |
---|---|
People Score | 60 |
Provider Score | 9 |
Hospital Score | 28 |
Travel Score | 12 |
39175 | Utica | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Utica, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39175)
Analyzing the quality of COPD care in Utica, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39175) requires a multifaceted approach, encompassing not just the number of physicians, but also the accessibility of primary care, the adoption of innovative technologies like telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide a COPD Score assessment, acknowledging the complexities inherent in rural healthcare environments.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Utica is a critical starting point. Determining the precise ratio necessitates data on the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists within the ZIP code, or those serving the area. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure can provide some insight. However, this data often needs to be supplemented with information from local healthcare providers and community health organizations to get a more accurate picture. A low physician-to-patient ratio, especially for specialists like pulmonologists, will negatively impact the COPD Score. This scarcity can lead to delayed diagnoses, longer wait times for appointments, and potentially poorer disease management.
Primary care availability is equally crucial. PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing COPD symptoms. Their ability to provide early diagnosis, initiate treatment plans, and coordinate care with specialists is essential. Evaluating primary care availability involves considering factors like appointment wait times, the acceptance of various insurance plans (including Medicare and Medicaid, which are frequently used by COPD patients), and the presence of extended hours or weekend clinics. Practices with readily available appointments and a patient-centered approach will contribute positively to the COPD Score.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in improving COPD care, particularly in rural areas where geographic barriers can limit access to specialists and regular check-ups. Assessing telemedicine integration involves investigating whether local practices offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs (e.g., oxygen saturation), and online educational resources for patients. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine can potentially achieve a higher COPD Score by improving patient access to care, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits, and empowering patients to manage their condition more effectively.
The integration of mental health resources is often overlooked in COPD care, but it's a critical component. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Evaluating the availability of mental health services within the Utica healthcare landscape involves examining whether primary care practices have integrated mental health professionals (e.g., therapists, psychiatrists) or have established referral pathways to mental health providers. The presence of support groups, educational programs, and resources addressing the psychological aspects of COPD will positively influence the COPD Score.
Identifying standout practices in Utica is important. This requires a deeper dive, going beyond simple metrics. Information from patient reviews, community feedback, and professional organizations can help identify practices that demonstrate excellence in COPD care. This could include practices that have a strong track record of patient satisfaction, a commitment to patient education, and a proactive approach to managing COPD exacerbations. These standout practices should be highlighted as examples of best practices.
Specific examples within Utica, if available, would be valuable. For instance, if a primary care clinic in Utica has adopted a comprehensive COPD management program, including patient education, regular pulmonary function testing, and readily available access to respiratory therapists, that practice would contribute positively to the overall COPD Score. Similarly, if a practice actively uses telemedicine for follow-up appointments and medication management, this would be a positive factor.
Conversely, if a practice has long wait times for appointments, limited access to specialists, and no mental health resources, this would negatively impact the score. The presence or absence of these elements will influence the overall assessment.
The COPD Score is not a static number. It's a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape. Regular updates are crucial to reflect changes in physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health services. The score should be used as a tool for continuous improvement, identifying areas where the community can work together to enhance COPD care.
The overall COPD Score for Utica, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39175) is not easily summarized without detailed data collection and analysis. However, based on the general challenges of rural healthcare, it is likely that the score will be lower than that of more urban areas with better access to specialists and resources. The success of the Utica healthcare system in managing COPD will depend on the ability of the community to address the challenges of physician shortages, improve access to primary care, adopt innovative technologies, and integrate mental health services into the care model.
To gain a more comprehensive visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Utica, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and the availability of resources, we encourage you to explore the power of interactive mapping. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing for a deeper understanding of the community's strengths and weaknesses.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like