The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 39439, Heidelberg, Mississippi is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.89 percent of the residents in 39439 has some form of health insurance. 42.22 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.30 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39439 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,331 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39439. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 653 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,002 health care providers accessible to residents in 39439, Heidelberg, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39439, Heidelberg, Mississippi
COPD Score | 32 |
---|---|
People Score | 65 |
Provider Score | 45 |
Hospital Score | 25 |
Travel Score | 32 |
39439 | Heidelberg | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Heidelberg, MS (39439)
This analysis assesses the availability and quality of primary care services, particularly focusing on resources relevant to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management, within the ZIP Code 39439, which encompasses Heidelberg, Mississippi. The evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, culminating in a COPD Score ranking. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape for individuals living with or at risk of COPD in this specific geographic area.
Heidelberg, a small town in Jasper County, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The rural setting often translates to reduced access to specialized medical care and a potentially older population, increasing the prevalence of chronic conditions like COPD. The assessment begins by examining the physician-to-patient ratio. Publicly available data, such as that from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), is essential to determine the number of primary care physicians actively practicing within the 39439 ZIP code and compare it to the total population. A low ratio, indicative of a scarcity of physicians, would negatively impact the COPD Score. This scarcity could lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment for COPD.
The analysis then delves into identifying standout practices within the area. These practices are evaluated based on several criteria, including the availability of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specialized training in respiratory medicine, the implementation of evidence-based COPD management protocols, and the availability of diagnostic tools such as spirometry. Practices that actively participate in COPD education programs for patients, offer smoking cessation support, and provide access to pulmonary rehabilitation services will receive higher scores. Furthermore, the analysis considers the practice’s commitment to comprehensive care, including coordination with specialists and home healthcare providers.
Telemedicine adoption is a crucial factor in improving healthcare access in rural areas. The analysis investigates the extent to which primary care practices in Heidelberg utilize telemedicine for COPD management. This includes assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring of patients' respiratory function, and the use of telehealth platforms for delivering educational materials and support groups. Practices that embrace telemedicine technologies are likely to receive higher scores, as these services can significantly reduce travel burdens, improve patient convenience, and enhance the continuity of care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of COPD care. Individuals with COPD frequently experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges due to the chronic nature of the disease and its impact on daily life. The analysis assesses the availability of mental health services within the 39439 ZIP code, including access to psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and support groups. Practices that integrate mental health screening and treatment into their COPD care plans will receive higher scores. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals is vital to providing holistic care and improving patient outcomes. The presence of community-based mental health services, such as those offered by local hospitals or community health centers, is also considered.
Furthermore, the analysis evaluates the availability of ancillary services essential for COPD management. This includes access to respiratory therapists, pharmacies specializing in respiratory medications, and durable medical equipment (DME) providers. The proximity and accessibility of these services are considered, as they play a crucial role in providing comprehensive care and supporting patients in managing their condition effectively. The analysis also looks at the availability of emergency services, such as ambulance services and hospital emergency departments, to ensure that patients have access to prompt medical attention in case of acute exacerbations of COPD.
The COPD Score is a composite metric derived from the evaluation of all the factors mentioned above. The score is not a simple sum but a weighted average, with each factor contributing differently to the overall assessment. The physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialized COPD care, and the integration of telemedicine are given higher weights. The COPD Score reflects the overall quality and accessibility of primary care services for individuals with COPD in Heidelberg, MS. A higher score indicates better access to care, more comprehensive services, and a greater likelihood of positive health outcomes. A lower score indicates potential challenges in accessing care and the need for improvements in the healthcare infrastructure.
The final COPD Score for Heidelberg, MS (39439) will be assigned based on the data collected and analyzed. The score is not a static number but a dynamic representation of the healthcare landscape, which can change over time as healthcare practices evolve and new resources become available. The score serves as a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and to identify areas for improvement. It also helps in benchmarking the quality of care in Heidelberg against other similar rural communities.
This analysis, while comprehensive, is based on publicly available information and may not capture all aspects of the healthcare system in Heidelberg. Further investigation, including direct interviews with healthcare providers and patient surveys, could provide a more detailed and nuanced understanding. The COPD Score is a starting point for a more in-depth evaluation of the healthcare needs of individuals with COPD in this rural community. This comprehensive analysis will provide a valuable overview of the primary care landscape in Heidelberg and its suitability for managing COPD.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Heidelberg, including the locations of practices, pharmacies, and other relevant resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a detailed and user-friendly overview of the healthcare infrastructure in the area, facilitating informed decision-making for patients and healthcare providers.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like