39653, Meadville, Mississippi COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 39653, Meadville, Mississippi is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.93 percent of the residents in 39653 has some form of health insurance. 46.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.23 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39653 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 627 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39653. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 600 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 95 health care providers accessible to residents in 39653, Meadville, Mississippi.

**COPD Score Analysis: Meadville, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39653)**

This analysis assesses the availability and quality of primary care services in Meadville, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39653), with a specific focus on resources relevant to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management. COPD is a significant health concern, and access to quality primary care is crucial for early diagnosis, effective treatment, and ongoing management. The analysis considers factors impacting COPD care, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.

Meadville, a rural community, faces inherent challenges in healthcare access. The population density is low, which often translates to a smaller pool of available physicians and specialists. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical starting point. A low physician-to-patient ratio can indicate limited access to care, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and inadequate management of chronic conditions like COPD. This is a fundamental element of the 'COPD Score' assessment.

The analysis considers the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code. Are physicians clustered in specific areas, potentially creating access disparities for residents living further away? The presence of any urgent care facilities or walk-in clinics in the area is also a factor. These facilities can provide crucial immediate care for COPD exacerbations, which are often time-sensitive. The availability of these facilities can significantly impact the overall 'COPD Score'.

Standout practices are identified based on several criteria. These include the presence of board-certified pulmonologists or PCPs with a demonstrated interest in COPD management. The availability of on-site pulmonary function testing (PFT) is a significant advantage, as it allows for timely diagnosis and monitoring of COPD. Practices that participate in quality improvement programs related to COPD care are also viewed favorably. The presence of certified respiratory therapists (RRTs) further enhances a practice's ability to provide comprehensive COPD care.

Telemedicine adoption is a key consideration in a rural setting. Telemedicine offers the potential to bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care, particularly for chronic conditions like COPD. Practices that offer telehealth consultations, remote monitoring capabilities (e.g., for oxygen saturation levels), and virtual support groups receive higher scores. This is especially important for patients who may have difficulty traveling to in-person appointments.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of COPD, but they are essential. COPD can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site counselors or referrals to local mental health providers, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of COPD patients. The availability of support groups and educational programs related to COPD and mental health also positively impacts the 'COPD Score'.

Specific examples of practices within the ZIP code that demonstrate a commitment to COPD care are identified. These practices are evaluated based on their physician-to-patient ratios, the qualifications of their physicians, the availability of diagnostic and treatment resources, their adoption of telemedicine, and their integration of mental health services. The analysis also considers patient reviews and satisfaction ratings, which provide valuable insights into the patient experience.

The 'COPD Score' is not a static number; it is a dynamic assessment that reflects the ever-changing landscape of healthcare. The availability of resources, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolving understanding of COPD management all influence the score. The analysis considers the potential for future improvements, such as the expansion of telemedicine services, the recruitment of additional specialists, and the development of new community-based support programs.

The availability of specialist care, such as pulmonologists, is also a critical factor. While PCPs are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to specialists is essential for complex cases and advanced treatment options. The analysis assesses the proximity of pulmonologists to Meadville and the ease with which patients can access their services. The presence of a hospital with a dedicated pulmonary rehabilitation program is also a significant advantage, providing patients with access to comprehensive respiratory therapy and exercise programs.

The analysis also considers the availability of resources related to smoking cessation. Smoking is the leading cause of COPD, and effective smoking cessation programs are crucial for preventing the disease and slowing its progression. Practices that offer smoking cessation counseling, medication assistance, and support groups receive higher scores. Collaboration with local health organizations and community outreach programs also enhances a practice's ability to address the issue of smoking.

The 'COPD Score' is a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare resources available to patients with COPD in Meadville. It is a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. By identifying strengths and weaknesses in the local healthcare system, the analysis can inform efforts to improve access to care, enhance the quality of treatment, and ultimately improve the lives of individuals living with COPD.

The analysis also considers the impact of socioeconomic factors on COPD care. Poverty, lack of access to transportation, and limited health literacy can all create barriers to care. The analysis assesses the availability of resources to address these challenges, such as patient assistance programs, transportation assistance, and culturally sensitive educational materials. The 'COPD Score' is designed to reflect the entire patient experience, not just the clinical aspects of care.

In conclusion, the 'COPD Score' analysis for Meadville, Mississippi, highlights the unique challenges and opportunities in providing quality COPD care in a rural setting. The assessment emphasizes the importance of primary care access, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The analysis identifies areas for improvement and recognizes practices that are demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive COPD management.

Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Meadville and beyond? Explore the power of geospatial data and gain deeper insights into healthcare access and resource distribution with CartoChrome maps. Discover how location intelligence can transform your understanding of healthcare disparities and inform strategic decision-making.