The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 39735, Ackerman, Mississippi is 14 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.63 percent of the residents in 39735 has some form of health insurance. 38.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.60 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39735 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 926 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39735. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 579 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 232 health care providers accessible to residents in 39735, Ackerman, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39735, Ackerman, Mississippi
COPD Score | 27 |
---|---|
People Score | 38 |
Provider Score | 14 |
Hospital Score | 43 |
Travel Score | 63 |
39735 | Ackerman | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of COPD care within ZIP Code 39735, encompassing the town of Ackerman, Mississippi, requires a multifaceted approach. We must assess the availability of primary care physicians, their adoption of best practices in COPD management, the integration of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources, all within the context of the local physician-to-patient ratio. This granular understanding allows for a nuanced "COPD Score" assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses in the delivery of care.
Ackerman, a relatively small community, likely faces challenges common to rural areas. One significant hurdle is the physician-to-patient ratio. National averages often mask the reality in underserved regions. Data from the Mississippi State Department of Health, cross-referenced with publicly available physician directories and insurance provider networks, provides an initial benchmark. This data, combined with information on physician specialties and practice sizes, paints a picture of the accessibility of primary care. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, translates to increased patient wait times, potentially delayed diagnoses, and less frequent follow-up appointments, all detrimental to effective COPD management.
The "COPD Score" must also evaluate the practices of the primary care physicians themselves. This involves examining their adherence to established COPD guidelines, such as those from the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Key indicators include the frequency of spirometry testing (a crucial diagnostic tool), the prescription rates of appropriate medications (bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids), and the utilization of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Practices that consistently implement these best practices will receive higher scores. Conversely, those with inconsistent adherence, or limited access to essential diagnostic tools, will see their scores lowered.
Telemedicine, particularly in rural areas, offers a powerful tool to bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care. The "COPD Score" must assess the adoption of telemedicine by local physicians. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring of patients' vital signs (using devices like pulse oximeters), and the use of telehealth platforms for medication management and patient education. Practices actively embracing telemedicine, and demonstrating its positive impact on patient outcomes, should be recognized for their innovation.
The mental health component of COPD care is often overlooked, yet it is critically important. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The "COPD Score" must therefore evaluate the availability of mental health resources within the community. This includes assessing the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs). It also involves evaluating the integration of mental health services within primary care practices, such as screening for depression and anxiety, and the availability of referrals to mental health specialists. Practices that actively address the mental health needs of their COPD patients will receive higher scores.
Identifying standout practices is a crucial aspect of the "COPD Score" analysis. This involves looking for clinics and physicians who demonstrate excellence in COPD management. These could be practices with high rates of spirometry testing, strong patient education programs, or innovative approaches to telemedicine. They might also be practices with robust mental health support systems. These standout practices serve as models for other providers in the community, and their success stories can be shared to promote best practices and improve the overall quality of care.
The specific "COPD Score" for doctors in ZIP Code 39735 and primary care availability in Ackerman would be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted average of all the factors discussed. The physician-to-patient ratio would be a significant component, along with the adherence to COPD guidelines, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability. The final score would provide a clear indication of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system in its ability to manage COPD.
The analysis would also identify areas for improvement. For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is low, the community might benefit from efforts to recruit more primary care physicians. If telemedicine adoption is limited, initiatives to educate physicians on its benefits and provide the necessary infrastructure could be beneficial. Addressing the mental health needs of COPD patients might require increased collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health specialists.
The "COPD Score" analysis is not a static assessment. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. As new guidelines are released, as telemedicine technologies evolve, and as the community's needs change, the analysis must be refined to ensure its accuracy and relevance.
The complexity of the healthcare landscape, and the need for clear, actionable insights, underscores the importance of visualizing this data. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful tool for visualizing the "COPD Score" analysis. These maps can display the physician-to-patient ratio, the locations of primary care practices, the availability of telemedicine services, and the locations of mental health resources. They can also highlight areas of high COPD prevalence and identify underserved populations. By visually representing the data, CartoChrome maps make it easier to understand the challenges and opportunities in COPD care and to identify areas for improvement.
To gain a deeper understanding of the COPD care landscape in Ackerman and explore the power of data visualization, we encourage you to visit CartoChrome maps. Their interactive platform can provide a clear, concise, and visually compelling representation of the data, empowering you to make informed decisions and advocate for improved COPD care in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like