The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 27555, Micro, North Carolina is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.31 percent of the residents in 27555 has some form of health insurance. 40.68 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27555 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 146 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27555. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 98 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,144 health care providers accessible to residents in 27555, Micro, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27555, Micro, North Carolina
COPD Score | 21 |
---|---|
People Score | 36 |
Provider Score | 36 |
Hospital Score | 47 |
Travel Score | 29 |
27555 | Micro | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Primary Care Landscape in Micro, NC (ZIP Code 27555)
Analyzing the primary care landscape in Micro, North Carolina (ZIP code 27555) through the lens of COPD management requires a nuanced approach. This analysis will attempt to provide a ‘COPD Score’ ranking, albeit an indirect one, by evaluating factors crucial to effective COPD care: physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. It's important to acknowledge that a direct COPD score, based on patient outcomes or specific practice metrics, is beyond the scope of this analysis due to data limitations and the complex nature of healthcare delivery. Instead, we will assess the environment that supports or hinders optimal COPD management.
The cornerstone of COPD care is access to a primary care physician (PCP). In Micro, a rural community, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While precise figures fluctuate, rural areas often face shortages. This means patients may experience longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and difficulty establishing a strong patient-physician relationship. The fewer the PCPs per capita, the lower the implied ‘COPD Score’ – as access to timely and consistent care is paramount. The absence of readily available, publicly accessible data on local physician-to-patient ratios necessitates reliance on broader regional and state averages, which may not fully reflect the reality within the specific ZIP code. However, it's reasonable to assume that Micro faces challenges in this area.
Beyond sheer numbers, the characteristics of the primary care practices in Micro significantly influence the quality of COPD care. Do practices offer comprehensive services, including spirometry (lung function testing) and pulmonary rehabilitation referrals? Are they equipped to manage comorbidities frequently associated with COPD, such as cardiovascular disease and depression? Practices that integrate these services and demonstrate a commitment to chronic disease management would receive a higher implied ‘COPD Score’. We must consider the availability of specialized respiratory therapists or nurses within these practices, as they are essential in patient education and disease management. Furthermore, the presence of certified COPD educators within the practice would be a significant advantage.
Telemedicine adoption represents a crucial element of modern healthcare, particularly in rural settings. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring services without the need for extensive travel. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine for COPD management, including virtual check-ins, medication management support, and remote pulmonary rehabilitation, would receive a higher implied ‘COPD Score’. This includes providing patients with the necessary technology or training to utilize these resources effectively. The degree of telemedicine integration reflects a practice's commitment to patient convenience and proactive disease management.
Mental health is a crucial, yet often overlooked, aspect of COPD care. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its impact on breathing and daily activities, can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this and integrate mental health resources into their care model would receive a higher implied ‘COPD Score’. This includes providing access to mental health professionals, offering support groups, and screening for depression and anxiety. The availability of these resources is vital for holistic patient care.
Standout practices within Micro, if any, would be those that demonstrate a holistic approach to COPD management. This encompasses not only medical expertise but also a commitment to patient education, preventative care, and accessibility. These practices likely have a dedicated team, including nurses, respiratory therapists, and potentially a care coordinator, to ensure patients receive comprehensive support. They may actively participate in community outreach programs to raise awareness about COPD and promote early detection. These practices, if identified, would naturally receive a higher implied ‘COPD Score’ due to their commitment to patient well-being.
In the absence of detailed, publicly available data on individual practice performance, this analysis relies on assumptions based on general healthcare trends and the specific challenges faced by rural communities. It is vital to recognize the limitations of this type of assessment. A true ‘COPD Score’ would require detailed data on patient outcomes, practice protocols, and resource utilization. However, by considering the factors discussed above, we can gain a valuable understanding of the primary care landscape in Micro and its potential impact on COPD management.
The ‘COPD Score’ for Micro, based on this analysis, would likely be moderate, reflecting the challenges of rural healthcare delivery. The availability of PCPs, the degree of telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources are likely to be key determinants of this score. Practices that actively address these areas will be best positioned to provide optimal COPD care.
For a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Micro, including the location of primary care practices, their service offerings, and potentially their telemedicine capabilities, we encourage you to explore the power of geospatial analysis.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like