The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 27614, Raleigh, North Carolina is 68 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.23 percent of the residents in 27614 has some form of health insurance. 21.03 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 84.28 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27614 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 7,993 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 35 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27614. An estimate of 60 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,960 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 24,130 health care providers accessible to residents in 27614, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27614, Raleigh, North Carolina
COPD Score | 86 |
---|---|
People Score | 57 |
Provider Score | 68 |
Hospital Score | 62 |
Travel Score | 63 |
27614 | Raleigh | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Primary Care in Raleigh (27614)
This analysis delves into the primary care landscape within Raleigh's 27614 ZIP code, focusing on elements crucial for individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). We'll assess factors influencing COPD patient care, including physician accessibility, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support – all critical for effective disease management. The goal is to provide a nuanced 'COPD Score' assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses within the local healthcare ecosystem.
The foundation of good COPD care rests on accessible primary care. Physician-to-patient ratios are a key indicator. While precise numbers fluctuate, 27614, like much of Raleigh, faces challenges. The demand for primary care exceeds the supply, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to preventative care and timely interventions. This scarcity can be particularly detrimental to COPD patients, who require regular check-ups, medication management, and prompt attention to exacerbations. A lower physician-to-patient ratio generally translates to better access, contributing positively to the COPD Score. Conversely, a higher ratio detracts from the score.
Several primary care practices within 27614 warrant closer examination. Practices demonstrating a commitment to COPD management often distinguish themselves. This includes those actively implementing evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, offering comprehensive pulmonary function testing, and participating in patient education programs. Practices that prioritize patient communication, providing clear instructions and readily accessible support, are also highly valued. The presence of specialized respiratory therapists within the practice adds significant value, enhancing the COPD Score. Conversely, practices lacking these elements would receive a lower score.
Telemedicine offers a valuable tool for COPD management, particularly in addressing accessibility issues. Practices embracing telehealth can provide remote consultations, medication refills, and symptom monitoring, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. This is especially crucial for patients with mobility limitations or those living in areas with limited transportation options. Telemedicine's impact on the COPD Score is substantial; practices actively utilizing and promoting telehealth would score higher. Practices with limited or no telehealth capabilities would receive a lower score, reflecting a missed opportunity to improve patient care.
The often-overlooked aspect of COPD care is mental health. COPD can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this connection and offer or facilitate access to mental health resources significantly enhance the COPD Score. This includes offering on-site counseling services, partnering with mental health professionals, or providing referrals to support groups. The presence of integrated mental health services is a strong positive indicator. Practices that neglect mental health considerations would receive a lower score, reflecting a gap in comprehensive patient care.
Analyzing the specific practices within 27614, we can identify potential standouts. Practices that actively participate in the American Lung Association's COPD initiatives, for example, would likely score well. Those utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) to track COPD-related metrics, such as exacerbation frequency and medication adherence, would also receive high marks. Practices demonstrating a proactive approach to patient education, providing resources on smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation, and self-management techniques, would be highly regarded. The COPD Score would be negatively impacted for practices lacking these proactive measures.
The overall COPD Score for primary care in 27614 would be influenced by the interplay of these factors. A higher score would indicate a healthcare environment that is more conducive to effective COPD management. This would be characterized by good physician accessibility, practices with a strong focus on COPD-specific care, robust telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. A lower score would reflect challenges in these areas, potentially leading to poorer patient outcomes.
The analysis also considers the broader context of primary care availability in Raleigh. The city's overall healthcare infrastructure, including hospital capacity, specialist availability, and the presence of community health centers, plays a role. The availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs within the area is a significant factor. Easy access to these programs is essential for COPD patients, and their presence elevates the COPD Score. Limited access to pulmonary rehabilitation detracts from the score.
The assessment of individual practices would involve a combination of publicly available information, patient reviews, and potentially direct inquiries. The aim is to create a comprehensive picture of the COPD care landscape within 27614. This analysis is not intended to provide medical advice but rather to offer an informed perspective on the quality and accessibility of primary care services for COPD patients.
The analysis would also consider the presence of specialized COPD clinics or centers within the area. These dedicated facilities often offer a higher level of expertise and resources, contributing positively to the COPD Score. The absence of such specialized services would negatively impact the score.
Finally, the assessment would consider the overall socioeconomic factors within 27614. Factors such as income levels, access to transportation, and health insurance coverage can significantly impact access to care and patient outcomes. Practices serving a diverse patient population and addressing these social determinants of health would receive a higher score. The analysis would also consider the availability of translation services for non-English speaking patients, further enhancing the COPD Score.
This analysis provides a framework for understanding the COPD care landscape within Raleigh's 27614 ZIP code. It highlights the key factors that contribute to effective COPD management, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Raleigh and explore the factors influencing COPD care in 27614? Utilize CartoChrome maps to gain a spatial understanding of physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability. CartoChrome maps offer an invaluable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike, allowing for data-driven decisions to improve COPD care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like