The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 27801, Rocky Mount, North Carolina is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.79 percent of the residents in 27801 has some form of health insurance. 49.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27801 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 5,280 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27801. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,130 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,624 health care providers accessible to residents in 27801, Rocky Mount, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27801, Rocky Mount, North Carolina
COPD Score | 6 |
---|---|
People Score | 5 |
Provider Score | 36 |
Hospital Score | 14 |
Travel Score | 49 |
27801 | Rocky Mount | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The evaluation of COPD care within Rocky Mount, North Carolina, specifically focusing on the 27801 ZIP code, necessitates a multifaceted approach. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive COPD Score, evaluating the quality and accessibility of care for individuals suffering from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The assessment considers physician-to-patient ratios, identifies standout practices, examines telemedicine adoption, and assesses the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components of effective COPD management.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Rocky Mount, within the context of primary care physicians (PCPs), significantly impacts COPD care. A higher ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per patient, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or inadequate management of COPD symptoms. The availability of pulmonologists, specialists in lung diseases, is also critical. A limited number of pulmonologists, relative to the COPD prevalence, can create bottlenecks in referrals, diagnostic procedures, and specialized treatment plans. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau, coupled with information from healthcare directories, can provide an initial estimate of these ratios. However, this data needs to be supplemented with information on physician specialization, patient load, and acceptance of new patients to generate a more accurate picture.
Standout practices in the 27801 ZIP code can be identified through several indicators. These include patient reviews, peer recommendations, and the utilization of evidence-based practices in COPD management. Practices that consistently demonstrate excellent patient outcomes, employ certified respiratory therapists, and offer comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programs are likely to be considered high-performing. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the COPD Foundation or the American Thoracic Society, often provide superior care. Examining the availability of spirometry testing, a key diagnostic tool for COPD, and the implementation of personalized treatment plans, including medication management and lifestyle recommendations, also contributes to the assessment.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve COPD care accessibility, particularly in rural areas like Rocky Mount. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, facilitating regular check-ups, medication adjustments, and symptom monitoring. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms, offering virtual consultations and remote patient monitoring, can improve access for patients with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as pulse oximeters and peak flow meters, allows for proactive intervention and early detection of exacerbations, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Evaluating the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of use of the platforms, and patient satisfaction with these services are crucial for assessing their impact on COPD care.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of COPD care. COPD can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services into their COPD management programs are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This integration can involve providing on-site mental health professionals, referring patients to mental health specialists, or offering support groups and educational programs. Assessing the availability of these resources, the referral pathways, and the coordination between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health providers is essential for a comprehensive COPD Score.
The creation of a COPD Score for the doctors in ZIP Code 27801 requires a systematic approach. This involves gathering data from various sources, including healthcare directories, patient reviews, and public health reports. This data should be analyzed and weighted based on its importance to COPD care. The physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources should all be considered. The resulting score should reflect the overall quality and accessibility of COPD care in the area.
The analysis should also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on COPD care. Poverty, lack of access to transportation, and limited health literacy can create barriers to care. Practices that actively address these barriers, such as offering financial assistance, providing transportation services, or offering patient education materials in multiple languages, should be recognized for their efforts. The COPD Score should reflect the practices' commitment to equitable care.
The COPD Score should be dynamic and updated regularly. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new treatments, technologies, and best practices emerging. Regular updates ensure that the score reflects the current state of COPD care in Rocky Mount. This also allows for the tracking of improvements and identifies areas where further efforts are needed.
Furthermore, the analysis should be transparent and accessible. The methodology used to calculate the COPD Score should be clearly explained, and the data sources should be cited. The results should be made available to the public, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare. This transparency fosters accountability and encourages continuous improvement in COPD care.
Finally, the COPD Score analysis should be used to drive positive change. The findings can be used to identify areas of strength and weakness in COPD care. This information can be used to inform healthcare policy, guide resource allocation, and encourage best practices. The ultimate goal is to improve the lives of individuals living with COPD in Rocky Mount and beyond.
To visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Rocky Mount, consider exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. These maps can provide a spatial representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, allowing you to identify potential gaps in care and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like