The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 27821, Edward, North Carolina is 35 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 64.42 percent of the residents in 27821 has some form of health insurance. 23.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.42 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27821 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 10 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27821. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 7 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 243 health care providers accessible to residents in 27821, Edward, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27821, Edward, North Carolina
COPD Score | 30 |
---|---|
People Score | 42 |
Provider Score | 35 |
Hospital Score | 44 |
Travel Score | 43 |
27821 | Edward | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**COPD Score Analysis: Primary Care in Edward, NC (ZIP Code 27821)**
Edward, North Carolina, a small community nestled within ZIP code 27821, presents a unique challenge when evaluating the landscape of primary care and its ability to serve residents, particularly those managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Assessing the quality and accessibility of care requires a multifaceted approach, considering factors beyond just the number of physicians. This analysis delves into the current state of primary care within Edward, focusing on COPD management, physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health support, ultimately providing a COPD Score assessment.
The foundation of any healthcare evaluation lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. Within Edward and its surrounding areas, the density of primary care physicians is a critical metric. The availability of doctors directly impacts access to care. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment plans. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau provides a baseline. However, this raw data needs contextualization. The actual number of physicians actively practicing, their specialization (e.g., family medicine, internal medicine), and their patient load all contribute to a more accurate picture.
Identifying standout practices is essential. Some primary care facilities may excel in COPD management, offering specialized services or demonstrating superior patient outcomes. Evaluating these practices involves reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, assessing the availability of pulmonary function testing (PFT) within the clinic, and examining the clinic’s adherence to established COPD treatment guidelines. Practices that proactively engage in patient education, offer smoking cessation programs, and collaborate with pulmonologists are likely to provide a higher quality of care. Furthermore, understanding the insurance plans accepted by these practices is crucial, as it directly impacts the accessibility of care for residents with varying insurance coverage.
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant opportunity to enhance access to care, especially for individuals with chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving adherence to treatment plans. The availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring devices (e.g., pulse oximeters), and digital patient portals are all indicators of telemedicine adoption. Practices that embrace telemedicine can potentially reach a wider patient population and provide more convenient care options, particularly beneficial for patients living in rural areas or those with mobility limitations.
The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. Patients with COPD often experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive COPD care. This includes access to mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists), counseling services, and support groups. Practices that integrate mental health services into their primary care model, either through on-site providers or partnerships with external mental health organizations, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. Examining the availability of these resources and their integration into the primary care workflow is crucial for a complete COPD Score assessment.
To develop a COPD Score, a weighting system must be applied to each of the factors discussed. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of standout practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources all contribute to the final score. For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio might negatively impact the score, while a practice with robust telemedicine capabilities and integrated mental health services would positively influence the score. The specific weighting assigned to each factor would depend on the relative importance of each in providing high-quality COPD care.
Edward, NC, and the surrounding areas within ZIP code 27821, likely face challenges in providing optimal COPD care. The rural nature of the area may contribute to a lower physician-to-patient ratio. This could potentially limit access to primary care physicians and specialist care. The availability of specialized COPD care, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs, is also a critical factor. Limited resources could mean that patients have to travel longer distances to receive specialized care.
In contrast, practices that have embraced telemedicine and integrated mental health services would positively impact the COPD Score. These practices would be better positioned to provide convenient, comprehensive care. The score would also reflect the quality of the primary care practices in the area. Practices that actively participate in patient education, offer smoking cessation programs, and adhere to established COPD treatment guidelines would likely contribute to a higher score.
The final COPD Score would provide a valuable tool for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It would highlight areas of strength and weakness in the local healthcare system. This information could be used to improve the delivery of care, allocate resources more effectively, and ultimately improve the health outcomes of individuals with COPD in Edward, NC.
This assessment is, however, a snapshot in time. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. The COPD Score would need to be updated regularly to reflect changes in physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. This ongoing monitoring would be essential to ensure that the score remains an accurate and useful tool for evaluating the quality of COPD care in Edward, NC.
For a comprehensive visual representation of the primary care landscape in Edward, NC (ZIP Code 27821), including physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Visualize the data, identify gaps in care, and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare ecosystem.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like