27936, Frisco, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 27936, Frisco, North Carolina is 40 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.21 percent of the residents in 27936 has some form of health insurance. 44.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 45.52 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27936 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 121 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27936. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 189 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 22 health care providers accessible to residents in 27936, Frisco, North Carolina.

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 27936 and Primary Care Availability in Frisco

Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Frisco, specifically within ZIP code 27936, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will assess various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial for effective COPD management. The ultimate goal is to provide a COPD Score assessment that reflects the overall healthcare landscape for this vulnerable population.

The foundation of any assessment lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care physicians, can significantly impede access to care, particularly for those with chronic conditions like COPD that necessitate regular check-ups and monitoring. Investigating the ratio in 27936 requires data on the total population within the ZIP code and the number of practicing primary care physicians. This data should be further refined to include only physicians accepting new patients, as this directly impacts accessibility. A high physician-to-patient ratio, coupled with a high prevalence of COPD within the community, would warrant serious concern.

Beyond mere numbers, the quality of care provided by existing practices must be evaluated. Identifying standout practices involves examining several key indicators. These include the presence of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specialized COPD training, the availability of on-site pulmonary function testing (PFT), and the implementation of comprehensive COPD management programs. Practices that actively participate in disease management registries, track patient outcomes, and demonstrate a commitment to patient education and support are highly desirable. Reviews and patient testimonials can also offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the overall quality of care.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in assessing COPD care. Telemedicine offers numerous advantages for COPD patients, including improved access to care, reduced travel time and costs, and the ability to monitor patients remotely. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and telehealth education programs are better equipped to serve the needs of COPD patients, especially those with mobility limitations or residing in geographically isolated areas. The availability of telemedicine can significantly enhance the COPD Score.

The often-overlooked aspect of COPD management is the integration of mental health resources. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, the availability of mental health services, such as counseling, therapy, and access to psychiatric care, is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health screenings, offer referrals to mental health professionals, and provide support groups for COPD patients demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. The presence and accessibility of these resources will positively influence the COPD Score.

To determine the COPD Score, each of the aforementioned factors needs to be weighted and scored. For instance, a high physician-to-patient ratio might negatively impact the score, while the presence of a dedicated COPD management program would positively influence it. The adoption of telemedicine and the availability of mental health resources would also contribute to the overall score. The specific weighting of each factor would depend on its relative importance in delivering effective COPD care.

Further research into the specific practices within 27936 is required to create a meaningful COPD Score. This research should include a detailed investigation of each practice's services, staffing, and patient outcomes. Information regarding the availability of specialized equipment, such as pulmonary rehabilitation facilities, would also be valuable. Public health data on COPD prevalence within the ZIP code is also crucial to contextualize the analysis.

The COPD Score should not be a static number. It should be a dynamic assessment that is regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This requires ongoing monitoring of physician availability, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolution of best practices in COPD management. The score should also be used to identify areas for improvement and to advocate for resources that enhance the quality of care for COPD patients.

The analysis must also consider the broader context of primary care availability in Frisco. The overall healthcare infrastructure, including the presence of hospitals, urgent care centers, and specialist referrals, can impact the COPD Score. The accessibility of transportation, particularly for those with mobility limitations, is another important factor. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and other healthcare providers is also essential for providing comprehensive COPD care.

The final COPD Score for 27936 would ideally be presented in a clear and concise format, summarizing the key findings and providing actionable recommendations. This could include identifying practices that excel in COPD management, highlighting areas where improvements are needed, and suggesting strategies for enhancing access to care. The score should be easily understandable by both healthcare professionals and patients, empowering them to make informed decisions about their care.

This comprehensive analysis, culminating in a well-defined COPD Score, is essential for ensuring that individuals with COPD in 27936 receive the highest quality of care. It requires a commitment to data-driven decision-making, ongoing monitoring, and a patient-centered approach to healthcare delivery. The creation of this score is a continuous process that necessitates collaboration between healthcare providers, public health officials, and the community.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 27936, including physician locations, practice types, and access to resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide valuable insights into the spatial distribution of healthcare services and help identify areas where improvements are needed.