The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28134, Pineville, North Carolina is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.22 percent of the residents in 28134 has some form of health insurance. 34.27 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28134 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,274 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28134. An estimate of 6 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,782 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 14,019 health care providers accessible to residents in 28134, Pineville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28134, Pineville, North Carolina
COPD Score | 74 |
---|---|
People Score | 57 |
Provider Score | 75 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 53 |
28134 | Pineville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of COPD care within ZIP Code 28134, encompassing Pineville, North Carolina, requires a multifaceted approach. We will assess the quality of primary care, focusing on physician availability, practice characteristics, and the integration of telemedicine and mental health resources. This evaluation aims to provide a COPD Score, a hypothetical ranking system reflecting the ease of access to and quality of care for individuals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Pineville.
Physician-to-patient ratios form a foundational element of this score. A higher ratio of patients per primary care physician (PCP) suggests potential difficulties in scheduling appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services would be crucial. If the ratio exceeds the national or state average, the COPD Score would be negatively impacted. The availability of pulmonologists, specialists dedicated to respiratory health, is also critical. A limited number of pulmonologists within or near the ZIP code would further depress the score, forcing patients to travel longer distances for specialized care.
The operational characteristics of primary care practices significantly influence the COPD Score. Practices employing certified respiratory therapists (CRTs) or registered respiratory therapists (RRTs) are highly desirable. These professionals provide specialized expertise in managing respiratory conditions, including COPD. The presence of on-site pulmonary function testing (PFT) equipment, used to diagnose and monitor lung function, is another positive indicator. Practices lacking these resources would receive a lower score, as patients would need to seek these services elsewhere, adding to the burden of care.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly vital, especially for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Practices offering telehealth consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and virtual support groups would receive a higher score. Telemedicine reduces the need for frequent in-person visits, particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those living in areas with limited transportation options. The ability to remotely monitor a patient’s oxygen saturation levels, for instance, allows for timely intervention and prevents exacerbations. Conversely, practices with no telehealth infrastructure would receive a lower score, reflecting a potential gap in care accessibility.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in COPD management, yet they are crucial. COPD can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or partnerships with mental health providers, would receive a higher score. Access to counseling, support groups, and medication management for mental health conditions is essential for holistic COPD care. Practices that neglect this aspect would receive a lower score, indicating a potential deficiency in addressing the full spectrum of patient needs.
Identifying standout practices within Pineville is essential for a comprehensive COPD Score. This requires evaluating practices based on the criteria outlined above. A practice with a low patient-to-physician ratio, a CRT on staff, PFT equipment, robust telemedicine capabilities, and integrated mental health services would be considered a top performer. This practice would receive a significantly higher score, serving as a model for other practices in the area. Conversely, a practice lacking these resources would receive a lower score, highlighting areas for improvement.
The COPD Score is not merely a numerical ranking; it is a reflection of the overall quality and accessibility of COPD care in Pineville. The score would be influenced by factors such as the availability of specialists, the adoption of technology, and the integration of mental health services. The higher the score, the better the care environment for individuals with COPD.
The evaluation of primary care availability in Pineville must also consider the specific challenges faced by the local population. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and health literacy can influence the effectiveness of COPD management. Practices that actively address these challenges, such as offering patient education materials in multiple languages or providing transportation assistance, would receive a higher score. This demonstrates a commitment to providing equitable care to all patients, regardless of their background.
To determine the COPD Score, a weighted scoring system would be implemented. Each criterion, such as physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration, would be assigned a specific weight based on its importance in COPD management. The overall score would be calculated by summing the weighted scores for each criterion. This allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality of care, taking into account the relative importance of each factor.
The analysis would reveal potential gaps in care. If the COPD Score is low, it would indicate a need for improvement in specific areas, such as increasing the number of specialists, expanding telemedicine capabilities, or integrating mental health services. This information can be used to advocate for policy changes, allocate resources, and improve the overall quality of care for individuals with COPD in Pineville.
The COPD Score provides a valuable framework for understanding the state of COPD care in Pineville. By analyzing physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of care can be achieved. This information can be used to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, ultimately improving the lives of individuals living with COPD.
For a visual representation of the data and a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources in Pineville and surrounding areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. Explore the landscape of healthcare availability and make informed decisions about your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like