28328, Clinton, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28328, Clinton, North Carolina is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.35 percent of the residents in 28328 has some form of health insurance. 42.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.05 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28328 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,412 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28328. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,319 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 481 health care providers accessible to residents in 28328, Clinton, North Carolina.

The analysis below provides a hypothetical "COPD Score" assessment for primary care physicians in ZIP Code 28328 (Clinton, North Carolina), considering factors relevant to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care. This score is a conceptual tool, not a real-world metric, and is designed to highlight key aspects of care availability and quality. The assessment also considers the broader context of primary care accessibility in Clinton.

The "COPD Score" framework evaluates several critical areas. First, it considers physician-to-patient ratios. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, suggests potential challenges in accessing timely appointments and comprehensive care. In Clinton, the availability of primary care physicians must be carefully examined, considering the population size and the prevalence of COPD, which is often higher in rural areas. The score would be negatively impacted by a scarcity of primary care providers.

Second, the analysis assesses the presence of standout practices. These are clinics or healthcare systems that demonstrate excellence in COPD management. This includes factors like specialized pulmonary services, respiratory therapy availability, patient education programs, and adherence to established COPD guidelines. A practice scoring highly in this area would likely have a robust COPD management program, including comprehensive pulmonary function testing (PFTs), regular follow-up appointments, and medication management. The presence of such practices would positively influence the overall "COPD Score."

Third, telemedicine adoption is crucial. Telemedicine offers a vital bridge for patients, especially those in rural areas, to access care remotely. This is particularly relevant for COPD patients who may experience mobility limitations or live far from specialist clinics. The "COPD Score" considers the availability of telehealth services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs (like oxygen saturation), and virtual respiratory therapy sessions. A higher degree of telemedicine adoption would enhance the score.

Fourth, the analysis examines mental health resources. COPD often co-exists with anxiety and depression, impacting a patient's quality of life and adherence to treatment plans. The "COPD Score" assesses the availability of mental health services within primary care practices or through readily accessible referrals. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Integrated mental health services would significantly improve the score.

Fifth, the assessment considers the availability of smoking cessation programs. Smoking is a primary cause of COPD, and effective cessation programs are vital for preventing disease progression. The "COPD Score" evaluates the availability of such programs within primary care settings or through community resources. This includes counseling, nicotine replacement therapy, and access to prescription medications. Robust smoking cessation support would be highly valued.

Sixth, the analysis looks at patient education programs. Empowering patients with knowledge about their condition is essential for effective self-management. The "COPD Score" evaluates the availability of educational resources, such as written materials, online resources, and group education sessions. The presence of comprehensive patient education programs would improve the score.

Seventh, the analysis considers the utilization of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs facilitate efficient communication between healthcare providers, improve care coordination, and enable data-driven decision-making. The "COPD Score" assesses the extent to which primary care practices utilize EHRs to manage COPD patients. The ability to track patient data, such as medication adherence, exacerbation frequency, and lung function tests, is important.

Eighth, the assessment evaluates the coordination of care. COPD often requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving primary care physicians, pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and other specialists. The "COPD Score" assesses the effectiveness of care coordination, including referral processes, communication between providers, and the use of care plans. Coordinated care would significantly enhance the score.

Ninth, the analysis considers the availability of home healthcare services. For patients with advanced COPD, home healthcare can provide essential support, including respiratory therapy, medication management, and assistance with daily living activities. The "COPD Score" assesses the availability of home healthcare services within the community. Access to these services would positively influence the score.

Tenth, the analysis examines the affordability of care. COPD treatment can be expensive, and financial barriers can prevent patients from accessing necessary care. The "COPD Score" considers factors such as insurance coverage, the availability of financial assistance programs, and the cost of medications. Affordable care would improve the score.

In the context of Clinton, North Carolina (ZIP Code 28328), the "COPD Score" would likely be influenced by several factors. The rural nature of the area may present challenges in terms of physician-to-patient ratios and access to specialized services. However, the presence of strong primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources could improve the score. The availability of smoking cessation programs and patient education resources would also be critical.

The analysis would involve collecting data from various sources, including local healthcare providers, community health organizations, and publicly available information. This data would be used to assign a score to each of the factors mentioned above, and the overall "COPD Score" would be calculated based on the weighted average of these individual scores. The final score would provide a snapshot of the quality and accessibility of COPD care in Clinton.

The "COPD Score" is not a static measure. It should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect changes in healthcare delivery, new treatment guidelines, and community needs. This is especially important in a rapidly changing healthcare landscape.

The availability of primary care in Clinton is a critical factor influencing the "COPD Score." If primary care access is limited, it could negatively impact the score. This is because patients may have difficulty getting timely appointments, receiving regular checkups, and accessing necessary referrals. The presence of a strong primary care network is a key component of effective COPD management.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Clinton, including physician locations, practice specializations, and the availability of resources, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome. CartoChrome provides detailed geographic visualizations of healthcare data, allowing you to identify areas with high concentrations of primary care physicians, assess the distribution of specialist services, and evaluate access to essential resources for COPD patients.