The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28350, Lakeview, North Carolina is 70 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 82.27 percent of the residents in 28350 has some form of health insurance. 46.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28350 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 28 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28350. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 138 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,388 health care providers accessible to residents in 28350, Lakeview, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28350, Lakeview, North Carolina
COPD Score | 95 |
---|---|
People Score | 99 |
Provider Score | 70 |
Hospital Score | 77 |
Travel Score | 32 |
28350 | Lakeview | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28350 and Primary Care Availability in Lakeview
Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care, particularly concerning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management, in ZIP Code 28350 (which we'll assume is a specific area within Lakeview, for the purposes of this analysis) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine the availability of mental health resources, all critical components in providing comprehensive COPD care.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of access. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnoses or inadequate management of chronic conditions like COPD. Determining the precise ratio in 28350 necessitates accessing publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), alongside data from local medical societies and hospital systems. This data would then be compared to national and state averages to gauge the relative availability of primary care physicians.
Standout practices within the area are those that demonstrate a commitment to excellence in COPD care. This would involve looking beyond general primary care and assessing specific criteria. Are there practices that have a dedicated pulmonologist or respiratory therapist on staff? Do they offer comprehensive pulmonary function testing (PFTs) on-site? Do they actively participate in COPD education programs for patients? Do they utilize evidence-based guidelines for COPD management, such as those established by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)? Identifying practices that excel in these areas is crucial for patients seeking high-quality care. This requires a deep dive into practice websites, patient reviews, and potentially, direct contact with the practices themselves.
Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role in healthcare delivery, particularly for managing chronic conditions. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. In the context of COPD, telemedicine can facilitate remote monitoring of symptoms, medication management, and virtual consultations with specialists. Assessing telemedicine adoption in 28350 involves examining whether local practices offer virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, or other telehealth services. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care to COPD patients.
The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. Patients with COPD often experience anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges due to the physical limitations and social isolation associated with the disease. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an essential component of comprehensive COPD care. This includes assessing whether primary care practices in 28350 have integrated behavioral health services, whether they offer referrals to mental health professionals, and whether there are readily available mental health resources within the community. Practices that prioritize mental health are demonstrating a holistic approach to patient care.
To perform a thorough COPD Score analysis, we'd need to collect and analyze data across these key areas. We would need to quantify the physician-to-patient ratio, identify standout practices based on their COPD-specific services and adherence to guidelines, assess the extent of telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources. The analysis would then synthesize this information to provide a comprehensive COPD Score, ranking practices and highlighting areas of strength and weakness.
For example, a practice might score highly on physician-to-patient ratio if they have a low patient load. However, their score would be diminished if they lack on-site pulmonary function testing. A practice with a strong telemedicine presence could score well, but if they have few mental health referrals, their score would be reduced. The overall score would reflect the practice's capacity to provide comprehensive, patient-centered COPD care.
The analysis would also need to consider the demographics of the 28350 population. The prevalence of COPD varies depending on factors such as age, smoking history, and socioeconomic status. Understanding the specific needs of the local population is essential for tailoring care and ensuring that resources are allocated effectively. This would involve examining census data and other demographic information to identify any disparities in access to care or prevalence of risk factors.
Furthermore, the analysis should incorporate patient perspectives. Gathering feedback from COPD patients in the area would provide valuable insights into their experiences with the healthcare system. This could involve conducting patient surveys or focus groups to assess patient satisfaction, identify barriers to care, and gather suggestions for improvement. This qualitative data would complement the quantitative data, providing a more complete picture of the quality of COPD care in 28350.
The final COPD Score would be a dynamic measure, subject to change as healthcare practices evolve and new technologies emerge. Regular updates and reassessments would be necessary to ensure that the score remains relevant and reflects the current state of COPD care in the area. This would involve ongoing monitoring of physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.
In conclusion, a comprehensive COPD Score analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 28350 and primary care availability in Lakeview requires a multi-pronged approach. It necessitates assessing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources. This analysis, combined with demographic data and patient feedback, provides a valuable tool for evaluating the quality of COPD care and identifying areas for improvement. This is a complex undertaking, but the resulting insights can significantly improve the lives of individuals living with COPD.
To visualize this data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 28350 and Lakeview, consider exploring interactive maps and data visualizations. CartoChrome maps offers powerful tools for analyzing and presenting geographic data, enabling you to visualize physician locations, patient demographics, and other relevant information.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like