The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28409, Wilmington, North Carolina is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.87 percent of the residents in 28409 has some form of health insurance. 23.82 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 85.22 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28409 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 8,619 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 12 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28409. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,968 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 18,020 health care providers accessible to residents in 28409, Wilmington, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28409, Wilmington, North Carolina
COPD Score | 43 |
---|---|
People Score | 50 |
Provider Score | 48 |
Hospital Score | 24 |
Travel Score | 61 |
28409 | Wilmington | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Wilmington, NC (ZIP Code 28409)
Analyzing the landscape of COPD care within Wilmington, North Carolina, specifically focusing on ZIP code 28409, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will assess the availability and quality of primary care physicians, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and ultimately, provide a 'COPD Score' ranking, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.
The foundation of effective COPD management rests heavily on accessible and responsive primary care. In 28409, understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. Publicly available data, such as that from the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau, needs to be cross-referenced to estimate this ratio. A low ratio, indicating a higher number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced time spent with each patient, impacting the quality of care for COPD sufferers. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests better access and potentially improved management of the disease.
Beyond mere numbers, the quality of primary care practices warrants scrutiny. Practices with a demonstrated commitment to COPD management often exhibit specific characteristics. These include the implementation of standardized COPD action plans, regular spirometry testing to assess lung function, patient education programs focused on medication adherence and lifestyle modifications (such as smoking cessation), and a proactive approach to managing exacerbations. Practices excelling in these areas deserve recognition and would be considered ‘standout practices’ in this analysis. Identifying these practices involves reviewing patient reviews, evaluating their online presence (websites and social media), and potentially, conducting interviews with healthcare professionals in the area.
Telemedicine has become increasingly important, particularly for chronic conditions like COPD. Its adoption in 28409 directly impacts patient access to care. Telemedicine offers the potential for remote monitoring of symptoms, virtual consultations, and medication management, particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in areas with limited access to in-person care. Assessing the telemedicine capabilities of local primary care practices involves identifying which providers offer virtual appointments, the types of services offered remotely (e.g., follow-up visits, medication refills, symptom monitoring), and the technologies used (e.g., video conferencing platforms, remote monitoring devices). Practices that have embraced telemedicine can significantly improve the accessibility and convenience of COPD care.
The complex nature of COPD often involves mental health challenges. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with breathing difficulties and lifestyle limitations, can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The integration of mental health resources into COPD care is, therefore, crucial. Evaluating the availability of these resources in 28409 requires identifying primary care practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral networks with mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists. The presence of support groups, both in-person and online, specifically for individuals with COPD, is another important factor. Practices that proactively address the mental health needs of their COPD patients demonstrate a more holistic and patient-centered approach to care.
Synthesizing these factors – physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration – allows for the creation of a ‘COPD Score’ ranking. This score would be a composite metric, assigning weights to each factor based on their relative importance in providing effective COPD care. For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio might negatively impact the score, while the presence of a robust telemedicine program would positively influence it. The identification of standout practices, with their commitment to best practices, would also significantly contribute to a higher score. The availability of mental health resources would be considered as a critical component of the overall score.
The final ‘COPD Score’ would provide a relative ranking of primary care practices within 28409, highlighting those that excel in providing comprehensive COPD care. This ranking could then be used by patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare, by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement, and by policymakers to assess the overall quality of COPD care in the community. The score would be dynamic, updated regularly to reflect changes in healthcare practices and the evolving needs of the patient population.
This analysis, however, is only a snapshot. The healthcare landscape is constantly changing. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that the ‘COPD Score’ remains relevant and accurately reflects the quality of COPD care in Wilmington. Further investigation may involve data collection from local hospitals, pharmacies, and support organizations.
The ultimate goal is to empower patients with the information they need to navigate the healthcare system effectively and to encourage healthcare providers to strive for excellence in COPD management. The analysis would also serve as a catalyst for improvements in the local healthcare system.
For a visual representation of this data, including the geographical distribution of primary care practices, physician density, telemedicine availability, and mental health resources, we recommend exploring interactive maps. These maps provide a dynamic and easily understandable overview of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like