28508, Albertson, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28508, Albertson, North Carolina is 46 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 75.84 percent of the residents in 28508 has some form of health insurance. 45.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 40.08 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28508 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 528 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28508. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 235 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 853 health care providers accessible to residents in 28508, Albertson, North Carolina.

**COPD Score Analysis: Physicians and Primary Care in Albertson, NC (ZIP Code 28508)**

Analyzing the healthcare landscape for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in and around Albertson, North Carolina (ZIP code 28508) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), assess physician-to-patient ratios, examine the adoption of telemedicine, evaluate the presence of mental health resources, and highlight any standout practices. The ultimate goal is to provide a COPD score, offering a nuanced understanding of the accessibility and quality of care for those managing this chronic respiratory condition.

The foundation of COPD management lies in robust primary care. Albertson, a small community, may present challenges in terms of healthcare accessibility. The number of PCPs actively practicing within ZIP code 28508 is a crucial starting point. This number, combined with the population of the area, determines the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio (i.e., a high number of patients per physician) can indicate potential difficulties in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses, treatment, and exacerbation management. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access, allowing for more proactive and preventative care. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau is essential to calculate this ratio accurately.

Beyond the raw numbers, the types of primary care practices present within the area are significant. Are there solo practitioners, or are there larger group practices? Group practices often offer advantages, such as a broader range of expertise, the ability to cover for each other, and potentially, better access to specialists. The presence of practices that specialize in pulmonary care or have a particular focus on respiratory health is especially valuable for COPD patients. These practices are more likely to have the experience and resources to effectively manage the complexities of the disease.

Telemedicine has emerged as a significant tool in healthcare, particularly for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and monitoring of symptoms, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in 28508 is a critical factor in the COPD score. Practices that offer telemedicine options can provide more convenient and accessible care, particularly for patients who may have mobility issues or live in remote areas. Information on telemedicine adoption can be gleaned from practice websites, patient reviews, and potentially, surveys conducted by local healthcare organizations.

The mental health of COPD patients is often overlooked, yet it plays a vital role in their overall well-being. COPD can cause anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an essential component of a comprehensive COPD care plan. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. The presence of these resources within the community, or readily accessible through referrals from primary care physicians, directly impacts the quality of care. Assessing the integration of mental health services into primary care practices is also essential. Do practices screen for mental health issues? Do they have established referral pathways to mental health professionals?

To identify standout practices, a review of patient reviews and testimonials is crucial. Websites like Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google Reviews can provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Look for practices that consistently receive positive feedback regarding communication, empathy, and the quality of care provided. Are there practices that are specifically mentioned for their expertise in COPD management? Do they have dedicated COPD programs or resources? Furthermore, accreditation by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) can also be an indicator of quality.

Creating a COPD score involves synthesizing all of the above factors. It is not a simple calculation but a holistic assessment. The score would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the types of practices available, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the overall patient experience. The score could be represented on a scale, such as a percentage or a letter grade, with a higher score indicating better access to and quality of care for COPD patients.

For example, a practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, offering telemedicine options, integrating mental health services, and receiving positive patient reviews would likely contribute positively to the overall COPD score. Conversely, a practice with a high ratio, limited telemedicine capabilities, and no readily available mental health resources would negatively impact the score. The final score would reflect the combined strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in 28508.

The analysis requires continuous updating. The healthcare landscape is dynamic, with practices opening, closing, and adapting their services. Regular monitoring of physician listings, practice websites, and patient reviews is necessary to maintain the accuracy of the COPD score. Furthermore, ongoing evaluation of the impact of telemedicine and other technological advancements is essential.

In conclusion, assessing the COPD score for 28508 is a complex undertaking that requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the healthcare landscape and identifying areas of strength and weakness. The availability of primary care physicians, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the overall patient experience all contribute to the quality of care for COPD patients.

To gain a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 28508, including the location of primary care practices, the availability of specialists, and other relevant data, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a powerful visual tool for understanding the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and identifying potential gaps in care.