28539, Hubert, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28539, Hubert, North Carolina is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 78.88 percent of the residents in 28539 has some form of health insurance. 34.35 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.23 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28539 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,914 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 25 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28539. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,173 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,923 health care providers accessible to residents in 28539, Hubert, North Carolina.

## COPD Score Analysis: Hubert, NC (ZIP Code 28539)

This analysis provides a COPD Score assessment for primary care physicians within the 28539 ZIP code, focusing on factors critical for managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). It evaluates physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and access to mental health support, all vital components in delivering comprehensive COPD care. The aim is to offer a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape in Hubert, NC, empowering both patients and healthcare providers.

The foundation of effective COPD management rests on readily accessible primary care. Analyzing physician-to-patient ratios is paramount. In Hubert, the availability of primary care physicians, especially those specializing in internal medicine or family practice, directly impacts the ability of COPD patients to receive timely diagnoses, regular check-ups, and ongoing treatment. A high physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a shortage of providers, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially, exacerbation of COPD symptoms. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests better access to care and improved patient outcomes. Data from the US Department of Health & Human Services and local county health reports should be considered to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care varies among practices. Identifying standout practices within Hubert is crucial. These practices often demonstrate superior COPD management through a combination of factors. They might have dedicated respiratory therapists, offering pulmonary function testing and patient education. They may implement robust disease management programs, including regular patient monitoring, medication adherence support, and personalized care plans. Furthermore, these practices might actively participate in clinical trials or research, staying abreast of the latest advancements in COPD treatment. Identifying these practices involves reviewing patient testimonials, analyzing practice performance metrics (if available), and assessing the qualifications and experience of the physicians.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in COPD management, particularly in rural areas like Hubert. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, remotely monitor patients' vital signs, and provide education via telehealth platforms can significantly improve access to care and patient adherence to treatment plans. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual check-ups, medication refills, and remote patient monitoring, likely score higher in a COPD assessment. The availability of reliable internet access in the area is also a significant factor, as it directly impacts the feasibility of telemedicine adoption.

The complex nature of COPD often necessitates addressing the mental health needs of patients. COPD can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation, significantly impacting quality of life. Practices that recognize this and offer or facilitate access to mental health resources are better positioned to provide holistic care. This includes having mental health professionals on staff, partnering with local mental health providers, or providing referrals to support groups and counseling services. Assessing the availability of these resources is a critical component of a comprehensive COPD Score.

Specific practice examples, without naming names, can illustrate the range of care available. One practice might boast a dedicated respiratory therapist, providing comprehensive pulmonary function testing and patient education sessions. Another might utilize a remote monitoring system, tracking patients' oxygen saturation levels and activity levels, allowing for proactive intervention. A third practice might partner with a local mental health clinic, offering integrated care for patients struggling with the psychological effects of COPD. These distinctions highlight the variability in care and the importance of considering these factors when evaluating a practice's COPD management capabilities.

The assessment of primary care availability in Hubert should also consider the presence of specialized respiratory care facilities. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of COPD management, access to pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, and specialized equipment is essential for managing severe cases and providing advanced treatments. The proximity to hospitals with pulmonary departments and the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs are important factors in the overall COPD Score.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the practice's approach to patient education and self-management. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, providing educational materials, offering self-management training programs, and encouraging patient participation in decision-making, are likely to achieve better patient outcomes. This involves assessing the availability of educational resources, the frequency of patient education sessions, and the use of patient-centered communication techniques.

The COPD Score for Hubert, NC, is not a static number. It is a dynamic assessment that should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This includes tracking the addition of new providers, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolution of best practices in COPD management. The score should be transparent and readily accessible to both patients and healthcare providers, allowing for informed decision-making and continuous improvement in care.

In conclusion, evaluating the COPD Score for Hubert, NC, requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves assessing physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, access to mental health resources, and the availability of specialized respiratory care. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in Hubert, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their care and encouraging healthcare providers to strive for excellence in COPD management.

For a visually compelling and data-rich understanding of the healthcare landscape in Hubert, NC (ZIP Code 28539), consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These maps can visually represent physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, providing a clear and concise overview of the COPD care environment. Explore the possibilities of CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare resources available to you.