28613, Conover, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28613, Conover, North Carolina is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.34 percent of the residents in 28613 has some form of health insurance. 39.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.99 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28613 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,005 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28613. An estimate of 10 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,247 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,236 health care providers accessible to residents in 28613, Conover, North Carolina.

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28613 and Primary Care Availability in Conover

Analyzing the COPD care landscape in Conover, North Carolina (ZIP Code 28613), requires a multifaceted approach, examining physician availability, resource allocation, and the integration of modern healthcare practices. The goal is to assess the overall quality of care available to individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs. This analysis will delve into the key factors influencing COPD care, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.

The cornerstone of effective COPD management is access to qualified primary care physicians (PCPs). Evaluating primary care availability in Conover involves examining the physician-to-patient ratio. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians for a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnoses or inadequate management of COPD. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests better access and potentially improved patient outcomes. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the U.S. Census Bureau can be used to calculate this ratio, providing a baseline understanding of PCP availability.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is critical. Are physicians clustered in specific areas, leaving other parts of Conover underserved? This geographical analysis reveals potential disparities in access to care. Furthermore, the types of practices PCPs operate in – solo practices, group practices, or affiliations with larger healthcare systems – influence the resources available to patients. Larger practices often have access to more specialized equipment, support staff, and integrated care models, which can be beneficial for COPD patients.

Identifying standout practices is crucial for understanding the best practices in COPD care within Conover. These practices might be recognized for their commitment to patient education, their proactive approach to disease management, or their utilization of innovative technologies. Reviews from patients, data on patient outcomes (where available), and the presence of certified respiratory therapists or specialized COPD programs are all indicators of a high-quality practice. Investigating the specific services offered by each practice, such as pulmonary function testing, smoking cessation programs, and access to respiratory specialists, provides a more granular understanding of their capabilities.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in modern COPD care. Telemedicine allows patients to receive consultations, monitor their symptoms, and access educational resources remotely, particularly beneficial for those with mobility limitations or living in rural areas. Assessing the level of telemedicine integration involves examining whether practices offer virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and online patient portals. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can provide more convenient and accessible care, potentially leading to improved patient adherence to treatment plans and better overall outcomes.

The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. COPD patients often experience anxiety, depression, and social isolation due to their chronic illness. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive COPD care. This includes access to mental health professionals, support groups, and educational materials. Analyzing the integration of mental health services within primary care practices and the availability of local mental health resources is essential for a holistic assessment of COPD care. Practices that proactively screen for mental health issues and offer integrated mental health services are better equipped to support the overall well-being of their patients.

Furthermore, the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs is essential. These programs provide structured exercise, education, and support to help patients manage their symptoms and improve their quality of life. Assessing the presence and accessibility of these programs within Conover, including their location, cost, and eligibility requirements, is crucial. The availability of respiratory therapists, who play a vital role in educating patients about their condition and providing respiratory treatments, is another factor to consider.

The impact of socioeconomic factors on COPD care cannot be overlooked. Factors like income, education, and access to transportation can significantly influence a patient's ability to access and adhere to treatment. Analyzing the socioeconomic demographics of Conover and considering the potential impact of these factors on COPD care is essential for a comprehensive assessment. Practices that are sensitive to these factors and offer support services, such as financial assistance or transportation assistance, are better positioned to serve their patients effectively.

The overall COPD score for doctors in ZIP Code 28613 is not a simple numerical value. It is a composite assessment based on the factors discussed above. The score reflects the availability of PCPs, the quality of care provided by individual practices, the integration of telemedicine and mental health resources, the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and the consideration of socioeconomic factors. This score provides a valuable snapshot of the current state of COPD care in Conover.

Ultimately, understanding the COPD care landscape in Conover is an ongoing process. Regular assessments, data collection, and community engagement are essential for identifying areas for improvement and ensuring that individuals with COPD receive the best possible care. The availability of accurate and up-to-date information is critical for both patients and healthcare providers.

To gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, physician locations, and patient demographics in Conover, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a visual representation of the data, allowing you to analyze the spatial relationships between healthcare providers, patient populations, and other relevant factors. Click here to explore the potential of CartoChrome maps and unlock a more comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape in Conover.