The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28629, Glendale Springs, North Carolina is 47 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 28629 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28629 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28629. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,336 health care providers accessible to residents in 28629, Glendale Springs, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28629, Glendale Springs, North Carolina
COPD Score | 30 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 47 |
Hospital Score | 80 |
Travel Score | 35 |
28629 | Glendale Springs | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Glendale Springs, NC (ZIP Code 28629)
Analyzing the availability of quality primary care and associated resources within Glendale Springs, North Carolina (ZIP Code 28629) necessitates a comprehensive evaluation, particularly concerning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). This analysis will delve into the existing infrastructure, physician-to-patient ratios, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, culminating in a COPD Score assessment. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the healthcare landscape for COPD patients and identify areas for improvement.
The foundation of effective COPD management lies in accessible and competent primary care. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. Unfortunately, precise, real-time data for Glendale Springs alone is difficult to obtain. However, we can leverage publicly available data from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the US Census Bureau. This data, combined with information from healthcare directories and insurance provider networks, allows for an estimated ratio. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, suggests potential challenges in accessing timely appointments and ongoing care. This, in turn, could negatively impact a patient's ability to manage their COPD effectively.
Identifying standout practices within the area is essential. These practices often demonstrate best practices in COPD management, potentially serving as models for others. Factors to consider include the availability of pulmonary function testing (PFT) on-site, the implementation of comprehensive COPD education programs, and the use of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Practices that actively participate in patient outreach and disease management programs, such as those offered by the American Lung Association or the COPD Foundation, would also be considered favorably. Reviews from patients and their experiences with the practice are also crucial in this assessment.
Telemedicine adoption presents a significant opportunity to improve COPD care in rural areas like Glendale Springs. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and patient monitoring, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. This is especially beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those living far from their healthcare providers. The availability of telehealth services, the types of services offered (e.g., virtual check-ups, remote monitoring of oxygen saturation), and the ease of access for patients are all key indicators. Practices that have embraced telemedicine effectively, integrating it seamlessly into their care models, would receive a higher score.
The often-overlooked aspect of COPD care is the crucial link between respiratory illness and mental health. COPD can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of a comprehensive COPD Score. This includes access to mental health professionals (psychiatrists, therapists, counselors), support groups, and educational programs focused on managing the psychological impact of COPD. Practices that proactively screen for mental health issues and have established referral pathways to mental health services would score higher. The integration of mental health services into the overall COPD care plan is essential for optimal patient outcomes.
Based on the above considerations, a COPD Score can be assigned. This score would be a composite measure, reflecting the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The score could be represented on a scale, for example, from 1 to 10, with 10 representing the highest level of care and resources.
For Glendale Springs (28629), the COPD Score is tentatively estimated to be in the moderate range, perhaps a 5 or 6. This assessment is based on publicly available data and assumptions about the area’s resources. The physician-to-patient ratio may be a challenge. The area likely has some primary care providers, but the ratio might be higher than the national average. The presence of standout practices and their COPD management protocols would need to be assessed. The adoption of telemedicine may be present but could vary. Mental health resources could be limited, requiring patients to travel to larger towns for specialized care.
The limitations of this analysis are evident. The lack of precise, real-time data necessitates reliance on estimates and assumptions. A more accurate assessment would require direct data collection from healthcare providers in the area, including information on their patient demographics, service offerings, and resource utilization. This would involve contacting practices, reviewing patient records (with appropriate consent), and conducting surveys.
To improve the COPD Score, several recommendations can be made. Firstly, efforts should be made to recruit more primary care physicians to the area. Secondly, healthcare providers should be encouraged to adopt and expand telemedicine services. Thirdly, practices should integrate mental health screening and referrals into their COPD care protocols. Fourthly, community outreach programs should be established to educate patients about COPD management and available resources. Finally, the development of a coordinated care network, involving primary care physicians, pulmonologists, mental health professionals, and support groups, is essential.
This analysis highlights the complexities of assessing healthcare resources in a rural setting. While the COPD Score provides a useful framework for evaluation, it is essential to recognize its limitations and to strive for more comprehensive and data-driven assessments. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of life for COPD patients in Glendale Springs and ensure they have access to the care they need.
For a more detailed and geographically precise understanding of healthcare resources in Glendale Springs, including the locations of physicians, practices, and support services, consider utilizing interactive mapping tools. Explore the landscape of healthcare providers, visualize patient demographics, and identify areas with the greatest need for improved access to care. Visualize the data and uncover patterns that are not immediately obvious.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like