COPD Score

28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.91 percent of the residents in 28652 has some form of health insurance. 22.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28652 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 37 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28652. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,166 health care providers accessible to residents in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina.

Health Scores in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina

COPD Score 87
People Score 64
Provider Score 34
Hospital Score 83
Travel Score 73

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

28652 Minneapolis North Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina

## COPD Score Analysis: 28652 vs. Minneapolis

This analysis provides a comparative overview of healthcare resources for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management, focusing on physicians in ZIP code 28652 (specifically addressing the area's healthcare landscape) and primary care availability in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The evaluation utilizes a hypothetical “COPD Score,” incorporating factors like physician density, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health support, crucial elements for effective COPD care.

**28652: A Rural Perspective**

ZIP code 28652, a region likely encompassing a rural or semi-rural area, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities in COPD care. The COPD Score for this area is significantly influenced by the potential for limited physician availability. The physician-to-patient ratio is a primary concern. In rural settings, the concentration of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists is often lower than in urban centers. This means fewer doctors are available to treat a potentially higher prevalence of COPD, exacerbated by factors like smoking rates and environmental exposures.

The practice characteristics of physicians in 28652 are also critical. Are there multi-specialty clinics offering integrated care, including respiratory therapists, or is the care primarily fragmented? The presence of dedicated COPD clinics or specialized programs would dramatically improve the COPD Score. Furthermore, the availability of diagnostic tools, such as readily accessible pulmonary function testing (PFT) and imaging capabilities, is essential for accurate diagnosis and monitoring.

Telemedicine adoption, in this context, is a potential game-changer. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and provide educational resources through telehealth platforms could significantly improve access to care, particularly for those in geographically isolated areas. The COPD Score would be positively impacted by widespread telehealth integration, including remote monitoring of vital signs and medication adherence.

Mental health resources are another crucial aspect of COPD management. COPD often co-occurs with anxiety and depression, impacting patients' quality of life and adherence to treatment plans. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, is essential for comprehensive care. The COPD Score would reflect the presence of mental health services, including their accessibility and integration with primary care practices.

**Minneapolis: An Urban Advantage**

Minneapolis, a major metropolitan area, likely presents a different scenario. The COPD Score here is likely to be influenced by higher physician density, offering a potentially lower physician-to-patient ratio. This means patients have more choices and potentially shorter wait times to see a PCP or pulmonologist. However, higher density does not automatically translate to better care.

The practice characteristics in Minneapolis are diverse. The presence of large, integrated healthcare systems, university-affiliated hospitals, and specialized pulmonary clinics could significantly boost the COPD Score. These institutions often offer a wider range of services, including advanced diagnostic capabilities, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and research opportunities.

Telemedicine is also increasingly prevalent in Minneapolis. The COPD Score would reflect the adoption of telehealth services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and patient education platforms. The availability of these services could improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas.

Mental health resources are also likely to be more readily available in Minneapolis. The presence of mental health professionals, including therapists and psychiatrists, is crucial for comprehensive COPD care. The COPD Score would reflect the integration of mental health services with primary care and pulmonary practices.

**Comparative Analysis and Key Differences**

The COPD Score is likely to be higher in Minneapolis due to the higher physician density, the greater availability of specialized services, and the potential for more robust mental health support. However, the specific scores depend on the actual implementation of these factors. For example, even in Minneapolis, access to care can vary depending on insurance coverage, socioeconomic status, and geographical location within the city.

In 28652, the COPD Score might be lower, but this does not necessarily equate to poor care. The success of COPD management in this area hinges on innovative approaches to overcome the challenges of rural healthcare. This includes leveraging telemedicine, fostering collaboration among healthcare providers, and ensuring access to mental health resources.

**Standout Practices and Considerations**

Identifying standout practices in both areas is crucial. In 28652, practices that effectively utilize telemedicine, partner with respiratory therapists, and offer patient education programs would score highly. In Minneapolis, practices that integrate mental health services, participate in clinical trials, and provide comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programs would be considered exemplary.

Furthermore, the COPD Score should consider factors like patient education and support groups. Effective COPD management requires patients to be actively involved in their care. The availability of educational resources, support groups, and self-management programs can significantly improve patient outcomes.

**Conclusion and Call to Action**

This comparative analysis highlights the diverse challenges and opportunities in COPD care across different geographic settings. The COPD Score, a hypothetical metric, underscores the importance of physician density, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources in providing effective COPD management.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in these areas and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, clinic types, and access to specialized services, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. This visualization tool allows for a detailed geographic analysis, providing valuable insights for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina

You may also like

28657, Newland, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 3.56 Miles

Total Population:

28622, Elk Park, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 5.17 Miles

Total Population:

28646, Linville, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 5.82 Miles

Total Population:

28662, Pineola, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 6.31 Miles

Total Population:

28604, Banner Elk, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 8.29 Miles

Total Population:

28616, Crossnore, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 9.16 Miles

Total Population:

28647, Linville Falls, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 9.43 Miles

Total Population:

28679, Sugar Grove, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 13.11 Miles

Total Population:

28692, Vilas, North Carolina
COPD Score
COPD Score

Distance from 28652: 15.71 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina