28736, Glenville, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28736, Glenville, North Carolina is 51 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 68.45 percent of the residents in 28736 has some form of health insurance. 41.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.54 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28736 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 53 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28736. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 265 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,580 health care providers accessible to residents in 28736, Glenville, North Carolina.

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28736 and Primary Care in Glenville

Evaluating the quality and accessibility of healthcare, particularly for chronic conditions like Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) within ZIP code 28736, encompassing Glenville, North Carolina, with a specific emphasis on resources pertinent to COPD management. The analysis aims to provide a 'COPD Score' assessment, considering factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator of healthcare access. In Glenville, the geographical challenges of a rural setting can exacerbate the impact of a low physician-to-patient ratio. The limited number of PCPs in the area means that each physician shoulders a greater patient load. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments for COPD sufferers. Researching the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 28736 is essential. Publicly available data from the US Department of Health and Human Services or state-level medical boards should be consulted to determine the number of practicing PCPs and the estimated population within the zip code. This data forms the foundation for the COPD Score assessment. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, would negatively impact the score.

Identifying standout practices within the area is critical. These practices often demonstrate superior care delivery models, potentially offering enhanced COPD management strategies. This involves investigating clinics and practices that may specialize in respiratory care or have a demonstrated commitment to managing chronic conditions. Key indicators include the availability of pulmonary function testing (PFT) within the practice or easy referral access, the use of evidence-based COPD treatment guidelines, and patient education programs focused on disease management, medication adherence, and smoking cessation. Furthermore, practices that participate in quality improvement initiatives or are recognized for excellence in patient care would contribute positively to the COPD Score.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor, particularly in rural areas where geographical barriers can limit access to care. Telemedicine offers a viable solution for patients with COPD, enabling remote consultations, medication management, and monitoring of symptoms. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments, remote patient monitoring (RPM) using wearable devices, and secure messaging platforms, would receive a higher score. This technology allows for more frequent and convenient check-ins, early detection of exacerbations, and improved patient adherence to treatment plans. The ability to connect patients with specialists remotely, such as pulmonologists, is another critical aspect of telemedicine adoption.

The often-overlooked aspect of mental health is critically important in COPD management. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its impact on breathing and physical activity, can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize and address the mental health needs of COPD patients would be highly valued. This includes the availability of on-site mental health professionals, referrals to therapists or psychiatrists, and the implementation of screening tools for depression and anxiety. Integration of mental health services into the COPD care plan can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life. A practice that actively promotes mental well-being would receive a higher score.

The COPD Score assessment would also consider the availability of support groups and educational resources. Local support groups offer patients a sense of community and provide opportunities to share experiences and learn from others. Access to educational materials, such as brochures, websites, and workshops, empowers patients to take an active role in their care. Practices that actively promote these resources would contribute positively to the overall score.

The analysis of the COPD Score requires a comprehensive review of available data. This involves gathering information from various sources, including online physician directories, healthcare provider websites, patient reviews, and public health data. The evaluation of each factor, such as physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, would be assigned a weighted score, reflecting its importance in COPD management. The overall COPD Score would then be calculated based on the sum of these weighted scores.

The final COPD Score would reflect the overall quality and accessibility of primary care services for COPD patients in Glenville. A higher score would indicate better access to care, more comprehensive COPD management strategies, and a greater emphasis on patient well-being. Conversely, a lower score would highlight areas for improvement, such as the need for more physicians, increased telemedicine adoption, and greater integration of mental health services. The assessment is a dynamic process, and the score should be updated periodically to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

This analysis provides a framework for assessing the quality and accessibility of healthcare for COPD patients in Glenville, North Carolina. It highlights the importance of factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. A comprehensive evaluation of these factors is crucial for improving the lives of individuals living with COPD.

To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources and identify potential gaps in care, we recommend using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Glenville and the surrounding areas. Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to gain deeper insights into healthcare access and improve patient outcomes.