The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 07066, Clark, New Jersey is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.97 percent of the residents in 07066 has some form of health insurance. 24.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 88.14 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 07066 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,417 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 18 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 07066. An estimate of 6 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,056 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,613 health care providers accessible to residents in 07066, Clark, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 07066, Clark, New Jersey
COPD Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 43 |
Provider Score | 63 |
Hospital Score | 17 |
Travel Score | 78 |
07066 | Clark | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical 'COPD Score' ranking for primary care physicians (PCPs) within ZIP code 07066, focusing on their capacity to manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and the availability of primary care resources in Clark, NJ. This is a simulated assessment, and actual data would be required for a true evaluation. The 'COPD Score' is a composite metric reflecting several factors relevant to COPD care.
The foundation of our 'COPD Score' rests on the physician-to-patient ratio. A lower ratio, indicating fewer patients per PCP, generally allows for more personalized and attentive care, crucial for COPD management. In Clark, NJ, the availability of PCPs is a critical factor. A shortage of PCPs would negatively impact the 'COPD Score' as patients might face difficulties in accessing timely appointments for diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management. The density of specialists, particularly pulmonologists, within a reasonable radius also influences the score. Easy access to specialized care is essential for COPD patients.
Telemedicine adoption is another significant component. Practices embracing telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and medication management, often score higher. This is particularly relevant for COPD patients who may experience difficulty traveling to appointments. Telemedicine can reduce the burden of frequent office visits, improve medication adherence, and facilitate early intervention in exacerbations. The 'COPD Score' considers the availability of telemedicine services, the types of services offered (e.g., virtual check-ups, remote monitoring of vital signs), and the ease of use for patients.
Mental health resources are integrated into the 'COPD Score' because COPD often co-exists with anxiety and depression. Practices offering integrated mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, would receive a higher score. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. The availability of educational materials, patient support programs, and smoking cessation resources also contributes to the overall score. Practices actively promoting patient education and empowerment are favored.
Standout practices within 07066 would be those demonstrating excellence across multiple dimensions. A practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, a strong telemedicine program, integrated mental health support, and robust patient education initiatives would likely achieve a high 'COPD Score.' The specific practices that meet these criteria are not known in this hypothetical analysis. However, the methodology would involve reviewing publicly available data, conducting surveys, and potentially interviewing physicians and patients.
A practice's commitment to evidence-based medicine is also a factor. Practices that adhere to national guidelines for COPD management, utilize spirometry for diagnosis, and employ appropriate medications and therapies would be recognized. The 'COPD Score' would assess the practice's adherence to these standards. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) and their integration with patient portals would also be considered. EHRs facilitate data tracking, medication management, and communication between physicians and patients.
Specifics regarding the primary care landscape in Clark, NJ, are hypothetical in this context. The assessment would involve gathering information on the number of PCPs, their specialties, and their practice locations. Data on hospital affiliations, referral patterns, and patient satisfaction would be gathered. The availability of ancillary services, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs and respiratory therapists, would also be assessed.
The 'COPD Score' is not a static number; it is a dynamic metric that can change over time. As practices adopt new technologies, improve their services, and adapt to evolving healthcare guidelines, their scores can be adjusted. The goal is to provide a comprehensive and objective assessment of the quality of COPD care available in a given area. This information can be used by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to improve COPD management and patient outcomes.
The analysis would consider the accessibility of care. This includes the geographic distribution of PCPs, the availability of public transportation, and the practice's hours of operation. Practices that are easily accessible to patients, regardless of their socioeconomic status or physical limitations, would receive a higher score. The analysis would also examine the practice's ability to communicate with patients in their preferred language.
The 'COPD Score' would also consider the practice's commitment to patient-centered care. This includes the practice's ability to listen to patients, involve them in decision-making, and provide them with the support they need to manage their COPD. Practices that prioritize patient satisfaction and build strong relationships with their patients would be recognized. The analysis would also consider the practice's commitment to quality improvement. Practices that regularly assess their performance, identify areas for improvement, and implement changes to improve patient outcomes would be favored.
In conclusion, the 'COPD Score' is a multifaceted assessment of primary care practices in 07066 and the availability of resources in Clark, NJ. It considers physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and adherence to best practices. While this analysis is hypothetical, it provides a framework for evaluating COPD care in a specific geographic area.
To gain a visual understanding of the distribution of these resources and the 'COPD Score' rankings, explore the power of spatial analysis with CartoChrome maps. Visualize the data and identify areas with the greatest needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like