The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 08010, Beverly, New Jersey is 81 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.52 percent of the residents in 08010 has some form of health insurance. 42.94 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.30 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08010 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,534 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08010. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,866 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 11,710 health care providers accessible to residents in 08010, Beverly, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08010, Beverly, New Jersey
COPD Score | 52 |
---|---|
People Score | 22 |
Provider Score | 81 |
Hospital Score | 22 |
Travel Score | 70 |
08010 | Beverly | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below focuses on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) care quality, accessibility, and resource availability for primary care physicians within ZIP code 08010 (Beverly, NJ), specifically regarding their ability to manage COPD patients. This assessment is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape, considering factors relevant to effective COPD management.
The foundation of COPD care relies heavily on the availability of primary care physicians. Beverly, NJ, a small community, necessitates a careful evaluation of the physician-to-patient ratio. A lower ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can strain resources and potentially limit the time physicians can dedicate to each patient, impacting the quality of care, particularly for chronic conditions like COPD. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access and potentially more personalized attention. However, the actual ratio is only one piece of the puzzle.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care hinges on the specific practices within the area. Some primary care practices may have developed specialized programs or protocols to address COPD. These could include dedicated respiratory therapists, in-office pulmonary function testing (spirometry), and robust patient education programs. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials or research related to COPD would also be considered more advanced. Assessing these practices would provide a more nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and online educational resources can significantly improve COPD management. Telemedicine allows for more frequent check-ins, early detection of exacerbations, and convenient access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies are better positioned to provide comprehensive and accessible COPD care.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in COPD management, but they are essential. COPD can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Primary care practices that integrate mental health services, such as on-site therapists or readily available referrals to mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. This integration is critical for addressing the psychological and emotional challenges associated with COPD.
To evaluate the primary care landscape in Beverly, NJ, a detailed analysis would begin with a comprehensive search of all primary care physicians practicing within the 08010 ZIP code. This would involve compiling a list of all practices and physicians. The next step would involve gathering data on the physician-to-patient ratios. This information can be obtained from various sources, including public health data, insurance provider networks, and physician directories.
Following the compilation of physician data, the focus would shift to the practices themselves. This would involve researching each practice's website, reviewing patient testimonials, and, if possible, contacting the practices directly to gather information about their COPD-specific programs, telemedicine capabilities, and mental health resources. This research would help identify standout practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive COPD care.
The analysis would also consider the availability of ancillary services, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs and respiratory therapists. These services are essential for helping COPD patients manage their symptoms, improve their lung function, and enhance their overall quality of life. The presence of these resources within or near Beverly, NJ, would be a significant factor in the overall COPD score.
The data gathered would then be used to create a COPD score for each practice and for the overall healthcare landscape in Beverly, NJ. The score would be based on a weighted system, with different factors given varying levels of importance. For example, practices with a lower physician-to-patient ratio, robust COPD-specific programs, telemedicine capabilities, and integrated mental health services would receive higher scores.
The final COPD score would provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality, accessibility, and resource availability for COPD care in Beverly, NJ. This information could be used by patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare, by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement, and by policymakers to allocate resources effectively.
The specific practices in Beverly, NJ, would be assessed based on their ability to meet the needs of COPD patients. This would involve evaluating their clinical expertise, their commitment to patient education, and their use of technology to improve care delivery. Practices that actively engage in these areas would be considered standout practices.
Telemedicine adoption would be another key factor. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online educational resources would be viewed more favorably. This would allow for more frequent check-ins, early detection of exacerbations, and convenient access to care.
Mental health resources would also be considered. Practices that integrate mental health services, such as on-site therapists or readily available referrals, would demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care.
The analysis would also consider the availability of ancillary services, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs and respiratory therapists. These services are essential for helping COPD patients manage their symptoms, improve their lung function, and enhance their overall quality of life.
The assessment would be a dynamic process. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and new technologies and treatment options are emerging. Therefore, the analysis would need to be updated regularly to reflect these changes.
In conclusion, the COPD score for Beverly, NJ, would be a valuable tool for patients, providers, and policymakers. It would provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality, accessibility, and resource availability for COPD care in the community. The score would be based on a weighted system, with different factors given varying levels of importance. The final score would be a reflection of the practices' ability to meet the needs of COPD patients.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Beverly, NJ, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a spatial representation of the data, allowing for a more intuitive and comprehensive analysis.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like