The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 08064, New Lisbon, New Jersey is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 08064 has some form of health insurance. 100.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 43.40 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08064 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08064. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 53 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,809 health care providers accessible to residents in 08064, New Lisbon, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08064, New Lisbon, New Jersey
COPD Score | 23 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 75 |
Hospital Score | 45 |
Travel Score | 30 |
08064 | New Lisbon | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing COPD care within the confines of a single ZIP code, 08064 (New Lisbon, New Jersey), presents a unique challenge. It necessitates a granular understanding of local resources, physician availability, and the overall healthcare ecosystem. We’ll construct a hypothetical “COPD Score” analysis, acknowledging that such a score would be complex to calculate in reality. Our focus will be on the key components that would inform such a score, specifically for primary care physicians and their ability to manage COPD patients.
The foundation of any COPD score for this area hinges on primary care availability. New Lisbon, a relatively small community, likely has a limited number of primary care physicians. The physician-to-patient ratio becomes critically important. A high ratio (fewer physicians per capita) would negatively impact the COPD score. This directly affects access to routine checkups, medication management, and early intervention strategies crucial for slowing COPD progression. The analysis must consider the total population of 08064 and the number of practicing primary care physicians within the ZIP code or those readily accessible within a reasonable driving distance.
A key factor is the presence of specialist referrals. While primary care physicians are the first line of defense, managing COPD often requires pulmonary specialists. Does 08064 have pulmonologists within easy reach, or do patients need to travel significant distances? The COPD score would reflect the ease of access to these specialized services. The availability of respiratory therapists for pulmonary rehabilitation programs would also be a significant positive factor. Such programs are essential for COPD patients to improve their lung function and quality of life.
Standout practices would significantly boost the COPD score. This involves identifying primary care practices that demonstrate a proactive approach to COPD management. Do they routinely screen patients for COPD risk factors, such as smoking history? Do they have established protocols for spirometry testing (a lung function test)? Are they actively involved in patient education regarding smoking cessation, medication adherence, and lifestyle modifications? Practices employing certified respiratory educators would be highly valued. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively to track COPD patients, monitor their progress, and ensure timely interventions would also score favorably.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the COPD score. The ability for patients to have virtual consultations with their primary care physicians or specialists can greatly improve access to care, particularly for those with mobility limitations or who live in remote areas. Does the practice offer telemedicine options for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and symptom management? The ease of use and accessibility of these telehealth platforms would be assessed. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as pulse oximeters, to track oxygen saturation levels at home, would be a significant advantage, allowing for early detection of exacerbations.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are vital for COPD patients. The chronic nature of the disease can lead to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The COPD score must evaluate the availability of mental health services within the community. Are there mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, who specialize in treating patients with chronic illnesses? Does the primary care practice offer integrated behavioral health services, or are referrals readily available? The presence of support groups and educational programs focused on coping with COPD would also be beneficial.
The analysis must consider the availability of smoking cessation programs. Smoking is the primary cause of COPD, and helping patients quit smoking is paramount. The COPD score would reflect the availability of evidence-based smoking cessation programs within the community. This includes access to nicotine replacement therapy, prescription medications, and counseling services. The success rates of these programs would also be considered.
The COPD score would also assess the affordability of care. The cost of medications, specialist visits, and pulmonary rehabilitation can be a significant burden for COPD patients. Does the community have resources to help patients afford their care, such as financial assistance programs or access to affordable medications? The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, would also be a factor.
In conclusion, a comprehensive COPD score for doctors in ZIP code 08064 would be a multifaceted assessment. It would consider physician-to-patient ratios, access to specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, the presence of smoking cessation programs, and the affordability of care. The standout practices would be those that demonstrate a proactive, patient-centered approach to COPD management, utilizing technology and community resources to improve patient outcomes. This hypothetical analysis highlights the complexities involved in assessing healthcare quality at a local level.
For a more detailed, visually-driven understanding of healthcare resources in New Lisbon and surrounding areas, including physician locations, specialist availability, and access to support services, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. They offer a dynamic, interactive way to visualize the data and gain a deeper insight into the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like