The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 08247, Stone Harbor, New Jersey is 66 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.34 percent of the residents in 08247 has some form of health insurance. 47.57 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 82.59 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08247 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 84 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08247. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 483 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 554 health care providers accessible to residents in 08247, Stone Harbor, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08247, Stone Harbor, New Jersey
COPD Score | 76 |
---|---|
People Score | 94 |
Provider Score | 66 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 17 |
08247 | Stone Harbor | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the availability and quality of COPD care in Stone Harbor, New Jersey (ZIP Code 08247), requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will assess the landscape of primary care physicians (PCPs), evaluate their capacity to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and examine the supporting resources available to patients. The goal is to provide a COPD Score assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
The first element to consider is physician-to-patient ratios. Determining the exact ratio of PCPs to the population in Stone Harbor is crucial. This data point is a foundational indicator of access. A low ratio can indicate potential difficulties in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, allowing for proactive management of COPD. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the New Jersey Department of Health, combined with information from professional directories like the American Medical Association, will be necessary to calculate this ratio accurately.
Beyond simple numbers, we must delve into the specific capabilities of the local PCPs. Are they board-certified in internal medicine or family medicine, the specialties most commonly associated with primary care? Do they have experience managing COPD? Do they have a demonstrated commitment to continuing medical education, particularly in respiratory care? This evaluation requires examining physician profiles, reviewing online patient reviews (with a critical eye for authenticity), and potentially conducting direct inquiries to practices.
The quality of care extends beyond the individual physician. The practices themselves play a vital role. Are the practices equipped with the necessary diagnostic tools, such as spirometry, a crucial test for COPD diagnosis and monitoring? Do they offer on-site pulmonary rehabilitation programs, or do they have established referral pathways to such services? The availability of these resources significantly impacts the patient's ability to receive comprehensive care locally.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to conduct virtual consultations can be particularly beneficial for COPD patients, especially those with mobility limitations or who live in geographically remote areas. Telemedicine can facilitate regular check-ins, medication management, and patient education, all of which are essential for effective COPD control. The analysis must determine which practices offer telemedicine services and the extent to which they are utilized.
Mental health is often overlooked in the context of chronic illness. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is therefore a crucial component of a comprehensive COPD care plan. The assessment must identify the availability of these resources within Stone Harbor and the surrounding area, and whether PCPs are actively screening for mental health issues and making appropriate referrals.
Identifying standout practices requires a nuanced approach. It involves looking beyond basic metrics and considering factors like patient satisfaction, the use of evidence-based guidelines, and the integration of technology. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, proactive disease management, and a holistic approach to care will be considered high-performing. The analysis will seek to identify practices that excel in these areas.
The COPD Score will be a composite measure, reflecting the various factors discussed above. It will consider physician-to-patient ratios, the qualifications and experience of PCPs, the availability of diagnostic tools and rehabilitation services, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Each factor will be weighted based on its relative importance, and the final score will provide a comprehensive assessment of the COPD care landscape in Stone Harbor.
The assessment process involves several challenges. Data availability can be a limitation. Some information, such as practice-specific performance metrics, may not be readily available. Patient privacy concerns also need to be addressed. The analysis will rely on publicly available data and information obtained through ethical means, ensuring patient confidentiality is maintained.
The final COPD Score will be presented in a clear and concise format, providing a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It will offer a snapshot of the current state of COPD care in Stone Harbor, highlighting areas of strength and areas needing improvement. The score will serve as a baseline for future evaluations and can be used to track progress over time.
The analysis also needs to consider the impact of insurance coverage. The availability of affordable health insurance and the acceptance of various insurance plans by local PCPs are critical factors influencing access to care. The assessment will examine the insurance landscape in Stone Harbor and how it affects COPD patients.
The role of patient education cannot be overstated. COPD patients need to be well-informed about their condition, treatment options, and self-management strategies. The analysis will assess the availability of patient education resources, such as educational materials, support groups, and online resources.
The analysis should also consider the impact of social determinants of health. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and housing conditions can significantly affect COPD patients' health outcomes. The assessment will consider these factors and their potential impact on the quality of care.
The final COPD Score analysis will provide a valuable resource for understanding the state of COPD care in Stone Harbor, New Jersey. It will offer insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their care and providing valuable information for healthcare providers and policymakers.
To visualize the complex data and geographical distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a dynamic and comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape, providing a powerful tool for both patients and providers.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like