The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 08554, Roebling, New Jersey is 77 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.53 percent of the residents in 08554 has some form of health insurance. 27.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.33 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08554 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,085 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08554. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 637 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,592 health care providers accessible to residents in 08554, Roebling, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08554, Roebling, New Jersey
COPD Score | 81 |
---|---|
People Score | 59 |
Provider Score | 77 |
Hospital Score | 27 |
Travel Score | 78 |
08554 | Roebling | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Physicians and Resources in Roebling, NJ (ZIP Code 08554)
Analyzing the landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care within Roebling, New Jersey (ZIP code 08554) necessitates a comprehensive understanding of physician availability, resource allocation, and the adoption of innovative healthcare practices. This analysis will provide a COPD Score assessment, considering key factors like physician-to-patient ratios, exemplary practices, telemedicine integration, and mental health support systems, all crucial for effectively managing this debilitating respiratory illness. The goal is to paint a clear picture of the current state of care and identify areas for improvement.
The physician-to-patient ratio within Roebling is a critical starting point. Determining the exact number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists practicing within the ZIP code is essential. While publicly available data provides some insights, a precise calculation requires accessing databases like the American Medical Association (AMA) physician directory or contacting local healthcare providers directly. A low physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for pulmonologists, can significantly hinder timely diagnosis and treatment for COPD patients. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed interventions, and potentially poorer health outcomes. The score will reflect the accessibility of specialized care.
Evaluating standout practices requires a deeper dive into the operational structures and service offerings of local medical facilities. Does the area have any clinics or practices that demonstrate a commitment to COPD management? This involves examining their approach to patient education, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and the availability of advanced diagnostic tools like spirometry. Practices that actively participate in clinical trials or research related to COPD would also receive higher marks. The score will consider whether practices offer comprehensive COPD care, including smoking cessation programs, personalized treatment plans, and regular follow-up appointments.
Telemedicine adoption plays a pivotal role in improving COPD care, especially in rural or underserved areas. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and provide education through digital platforms can significantly enhance accessibility and convenience. Practices that have embraced telemedicine for COPD management, offering virtual check-ups, medication management support, and remote monitoring of vital signs, will be ranked favorably. The score will reflect the extent to which telemedicine is integrated into the practices' workflows and its impact on patient care.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in COPD management, but they are crucial. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and counselors, who specialize in treating patients with chronic respiratory conditions is vital. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, will receive a higher score. The score will reflect the accessibility of mental health support and its integration into the overall COPD care plan.
To further refine the COPD Score, consider the following factors: the availability of respiratory therapists, the presence of support groups for COPD patients, and the practice's adherence to national guidelines for COPD management. The score will also consider the availability of emergency services, such as access to oxygen therapy and rapid transport to a hospital with specialized respiratory care units. The overall goal is to create a comprehensive assessment that reflects the quality, accessibility, and comprehensiveness of COPD care within Roebling.
The COPD Score, therefore, is not just a numerical value but a reflection of the overall healthcare ecosystem for COPD patients. It will incorporate the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The score will be based on a combination of publicly available data, direct inquiries to healthcare providers, and potentially patient feedback.
The final score will be presented on a scale, perhaps from 1 to 10, with 1 representing the lowest level of care and 10 representing the highest. This score will provide a clear and concise overview of the state of COPD care in Roebling, allowing patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to identify areas of strength and weakness. It will also serve as a benchmark for future improvements.
The analysis will specifically examine the practices and facilities within the 08554 ZIP code. It will identify the primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and other healthcare professionals who are actively involved in the care of COPD patients. The analysis will assess the availability of specialized equipment, such as spirometers and pulmonary rehabilitation facilities. It will also evaluate the extent to which these practices are utilizing evidence-based guidelines for COPD management.
The integration of technology will be a key factor in the assessment. The analysis will explore the use of telemedicine platforms, remote patient monitoring systems, and electronic health records. It will assess how these technologies are being used to improve patient access, convenience, and outcomes. The analysis will also consider the availability of online resources, such as patient education materials and support groups.
The analysis will also consider the socio-economic factors that can impact COPD care. These factors include access to transportation, insurance coverage, and the availability of affordable medications. The analysis will explore how these factors are affecting the ability of COPD patients to receive timely and effective care. The analysis will offer a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in COPD care within Roebling.
In conclusion, the COPD Score for Roebling, NJ (08554) will be a valuable tool for understanding the current state of COPD care. It will provide a comprehensive assessment of physician availability, resource allocation, and the adoption of innovative healthcare practices. This analysis will empower patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to make informed decisions and work towards improving the lives of individuals living with COPD.
Want to visualize the healthcare landscape in Roebling and beyond? Explore the power of geographical data analysis with CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of physician distribution, resource accessibility, and patient demographics.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like