The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 15108, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania is 87 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.79 percent of the residents in 15108 has some form of health insurance. 28.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 84.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15108 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 9,602 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 294 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15108. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8,035 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 17,410 health care providers accessible to residents in 15108, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15108, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 77 |
---|---|
People Score | 37 |
Provider Score | 87 |
Hospital Score | 39 |
Travel Score | 70 |
15108 | Coraopolis | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Coraopolis, PA (ZIP Code 15108)
Analyzing the landscape of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) care within Coraopolis, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 15108) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, ultimately providing a COPD Score assessment. The goal is to paint a comprehensive picture of the resources available to individuals managing this chronic respiratory illness within the community.
The foundation of effective COPD management rests on accessible primary care. Coraopolis, as a suburban community, likely benefits from a mix of independent practices and affiliations with larger healthcare systems. Assessing primary care availability involves evaluating the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the ZIP code and its immediate surrounding areas. Further, it’s crucial to consider the patient load each PCP manages. A high patient-to-physician ratio can lead to reduced appointment availability and potentially shorter consultation times, impacting the quality of care for COPD patients who often require frequent check-ups and personalized management plans.
Precise physician-to-patient ratio data requires accessing local healthcare databases and potentially contacting local practices directly. However, public health reports and regional medical association data often provide estimates. A favorable ratio, with a lower number of patients per PCP, generally indicates better access to care. The proximity of specialists, particularly pulmonologists, is also essential. While PCPs are the cornerstone of COPD management, pulmonologists provide specialized expertise in diagnosis, treatment, and advanced therapies. The presence of nearby pulmonary specialists, readily accessible for referrals, significantly enhances the COPD Score.
Identifying standout practices involves examining their approach to COPD care. This includes evaluating their adherence to established COPD treatment guidelines, such as those published by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Practices excelling in COPD care often implement structured programs, including patient education, smoking cessation support, and regular pulmonary function testing (PFTs). They may also employ specialized nurses or respiratory therapists dedicated to COPD management. Furthermore, the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and their effective utilization for tracking patient progress and coordinating care are crucial indicators of quality.
Telemedicine is rapidly transforming healthcare delivery, and its impact on COPD management is substantial. Remote monitoring of patients' vital signs, virtual consultations, and medication management support through telehealth platforms can significantly improve patient outcomes, especially for individuals with mobility limitations or those residing in underserved areas. The COPD Score benefits from practices that actively integrate telemedicine into their care models. This includes providing virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and digital educational resources for patients. The ease of access to these technologies and the level of patient support provided are key factors.
The intricate link between COPD and mental health demands careful consideration. COPD patients frequently experience anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges due to the chronic nature of their illness and its impact on their daily lives. The availability of mental health resources within the community, including therapists, counselors, and support groups, is vital for comprehensive COPD care. Practices that proactively screen patients for mental health issues and offer referrals to appropriate services significantly enhance the COPD Score. Collaboration between PCPs, pulmonologists, and mental health professionals creates a holistic approach to patient well-being.
Assessing the overall COPD Score involves synthesizing the data gathered from the aforementioned areas. A high score indicates a community with robust primary care availability, favorable physician-to-patient ratios, practices adhering to best practices, proactive telemedicine integration, and readily accessible mental health resources. Conversely, a lower score reflects areas where improvements are needed to enhance COPD care. This score is not a static number but a dynamic assessment reflecting the evolving healthcare landscape.
The specific practices within 15108 that excel in COPD care would need to be identified through detailed research. This could involve reviewing patient testimonials, analyzing practice websites, and potentially conducting interviews with healthcare providers. The goal is to pinpoint those practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive COPD management, incorporating the elements discussed above.
The data analysis, while not exhaustive, provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of COPD care in Coraopolis. The overall picture is dynamic, requiring continuous monitoring and evaluation. This analysis serves as a starting point for further investigation and improvement efforts.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like