The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 15148, Wilmerding, Pennsylvania is 85 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.20 percent of the residents in 15148 has some form of health insurance. 61.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15148 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 627 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 6 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15148. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 372 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 12,489 health care providers accessible to residents in 15148, Wilmerding, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15148, Wilmerding, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 66 |
---|---|
People Score | 18 |
Provider Score | 85 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 58 |
15148 | Wilmerding | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Wilmerding, PA (ZIP Code 15148)
This analysis delves into the quality of primary care and its implications for individuals managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) within the 15148 ZIP code, encompassing Wilmerding, Pennsylvania. The assessment considers various factors, including physician availability, practice characteristics, and the integration of supportive services crucial for COPD management. The ultimate goal is to provide a COPD Score, a relative ranking reflecting the ease and quality of care available to COPD patients in this specific area.
The foundation of effective COPD management rests on accessible and responsive primary care. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. A high ratio, signifying fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Data on the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 15148 is crucial. Publicly available resources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) can provide this information, or a local healthcare authority. A low ratio, indicative of a shortage of primary care physicians, would negatively impact the COPD Score. Conversely, a favorable ratio would be a significant positive factor.
Beyond sheer numbers, the characteristics of the primary care practices themselves are vital. Are practices accepting new patients? Do they have experience treating COPD patients? Do they offer specialized services like pulmonary function testing (PFT) on-site? Practices that are actively accepting new patients, have a demonstrated history of managing COPD, and provide readily available diagnostic tools like PFTs would significantly boost the COPD Score. Conversely, practices with limited capacity, a lack of specialized knowledge, or requiring referrals for essential diagnostic tests would diminish the score.
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant advancement in healthcare accessibility, particularly for patients with chronic conditions like COPD. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and symptom monitoring, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits, which can be challenging for individuals with breathing difficulties. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring programs, would receive a higher COPD Score. Practices lacking telemedicine capabilities would score lower.
Mental health is inextricably linked to COPD. The chronic nature of the disease, coupled with its impact on physical function and quality of life, can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Primary care practices that recognize this connection and provide access to mental health resources are essential. This includes on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health providers, or readily available referral pathways. Practices with robust mental health support would receive a higher COPD Score. Practices lacking these resources would negatively impact the score.
The availability of ancillary services further influences the COPD Score. This includes access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs, smoking cessation support, and respiratory therapists. Pulmonary rehabilitation helps patients improve their breathing and overall physical condition. Smoking cessation programs are critical for preventing disease progression. Respiratory therapists provide specialized care and education. Practices with strong connections to these resources, facilitating easy access for patients, would receive a higher score. A lack of these resources would lead to a lower score.
The COPD Score, therefore, is a composite measure. It is not a simple numerical value but rather a qualitative assessment based on the interplay of several factors. The assessment process must be evidence-based, drawing upon publicly available data, patient testimonials (where available), and direct contact with local healthcare providers. The score would be relative, comparing the primary care landscape in 15148 to a benchmark or other similar areas.
The analysis must consider the limitations of the data. Publicly available data may not always be current or comprehensive. Patient testimonials, while valuable, can be subjective. Direct contact with practices might be limited by privacy concerns or a lack of responsiveness. Despite these limitations, a well-researched analysis provides a valuable snapshot of the healthcare environment for COPD patients in Wilmerding.
A high COPD Score would indicate a favorable environment for COPD patients in 15148, characterized by readily available primary care physicians, practices with COPD expertise, adoption of telemedicine, integrated mental health support, and access to essential ancillary services. A low score would suggest challenges in accessing quality care, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes for COPD patients.
The ultimate value of this analysis lies in its ability to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Patients can use the information to make informed choices about their care. Healthcare providers can identify areas for improvement and enhance their services. Policymakers can use the analysis to address healthcare disparities and allocate resources effectively.
To further enhance this analysis and visualize the healthcare landscape of Wilmerding, PA, and surrounding areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can visually represent the distribution of primary care practices, telemedicine availability, and other relevant factors, providing a clear and comprehensive understanding of the healthcare ecosystem. Explore the potential of CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper insight into the challenges and opportunities facing COPD patients in 15148.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like