15428, Dawson, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 15428, Dawson, Pennsylvania is 61 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.42 percent of the residents in 15428 has some form of health insurance. 41.94 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15428 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 515 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15428. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 332 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,225 health care providers accessible to residents in 15428, Dawson, Pennsylvania.

## COPD Score Analysis: Dawson, PA (ZIP Code 15428)

Analyzing the availability of primary care physicians and resources for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management in Dawson, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 15428) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers several critical factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, all contributing to a "COPD Score" that reflects the community's preparedness to address this prevalent respiratory illness.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of access to care. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potential delays in diagnosing and managing COPD. In Dawson, the exact physician-to-patient ratio requires accessing publicly available data, such as that from the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with physician directories. However, given the rural nature of the area, it is reasonable to anticipate a ratio that may be less favorable than in more urbanized regions. This could significantly impact the COPD Score, potentially lowering it due to the challenges patients face in accessing timely medical attention.

Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating the quality of care provided by primary care physicians and any specialized pulmonologists serving the area. This assessment considers factors like patient reviews, the use of evidence-based treatment guidelines, and the availability of comprehensive COPD management programs. Practices that actively engage in patient education, offer pulmonary rehabilitation services, and utilize advanced diagnostic tools would likely receive higher marks. Furthermore, the presence of pulmonologists or respiratory specialists in the immediate vicinity would be a significant positive factor, increasing the COPD Score. Conversely, a lack of such specialized care would negatively impact the score, highlighting a potential gap in the community's ability to effectively manage complex COPD cases.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas where geographical barriers can be significant. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and online patient education programs would contribute positively to the COPD Score. These technologies allow physicians to monitor patients’ conditions more closely, adjust treatment plans remotely, and provide timely support, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. The absence of telemedicine capabilities, on the other hand, would be a negative factor, potentially limiting access to care and hindering effective COPD management.

The integration of mental health resources is also essential. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, who are familiar with the challenges of COPD patients, is a critical component of comprehensive care. Practices that actively screen for mental health issues, provide access to counseling services, or collaborate with mental health specialists would enhance the COPD Score. Conversely, a lack of mental health support would be a significant concern, potentially leading to poorer patient outcomes and reduced quality of life.

Evaluating the overall COPD Score requires synthesizing all these factors. A high score would indicate a community with ample primary care physicians, access to specialized pulmonology services, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. This scenario would suggest a well-equipped healthcare system capable of effectively managing COPD. A low score, on the other hand, would point to potential deficiencies, such as a shortage of physicians, limited access to specialized care, minimal telemedicine capabilities, and a lack of mental health support. This would indicate a need for improvements to ensure that COPD patients receive the comprehensive care they require.

Specific practices in Dawson would need individual evaluation. Publicly available information, such as online reviews, practice websites, and insurance provider directories, could offer insights into the services offered. Searching for practices that explicitly mention COPD management, pulmonary rehabilitation, or telemedicine capabilities would be a starting point. Additionally, contacting local healthcare providers directly could provide more detailed information about their services and resources. The absence of readily available information would also negatively impact the COPD score, as it suggests a lack of transparency and potentially limited resources.

The impact of the local hospital, if any, in or near Dawson is also important. Hospitals often provide essential services for COPD patients, including emergency care for exacerbations, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and access to specialized medical equipment. The presence of a hospital with a dedicated respiratory care unit would be a significant positive factor, while the absence of such facilities would negatively impact the COPD score. The hospital's capacity to handle COPD-related emergencies and provide ongoing support is a crucial element of the community's overall preparedness.

The availability of support groups and patient education resources also plays a role. COPD patients often benefit from connecting with others who share similar experiences and from accessing educational materials that empower them to manage their condition effectively. The presence of local support groups, online resources, and educational programs would contribute positively to the COPD Score. Conversely, a lack of such resources would be a negative factor, potentially leaving patients feeling isolated and uninformed.

In conclusion, assessing the COPD Score for Dawson, PA (15428) requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the availability of support groups. The rural nature of the area likely presents challenges in accessing specialized care and resources. The overall score reflects the community's ability to provide comprehensive and effective COPD management. The higher the score, the better prepared the community is to support COPD patients.

For a more detailed and visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Dawson, Pennsylvania, and the surrounding areas, including physician locations, hospital data, and other relevant information, we encourage you to explore the power of spatial analysis.

**Click here to explore CartoChrome maps and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare resources available in your community!**