15458, Mc Clellandtown, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 15458, Mc Clellandtown, Pennsylvania is 29 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.59 percent of the residents in 15458 has some form of health insurance. 36.02 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 82.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15458 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 661 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15458. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 506 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 757 health care providers accessible to residents in 15458, Mc Clellandtown, Pennsylvania.

The task requires a hypothetical assessment, as real-time, dynamic data on physician performance and resource availability is not publicly accessible in a way that allows for the creation of a "COPD Score" as requested. This response will provide a framework for such an analysis, detailing the factors that would be considered and how they might be evaluated.

**COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 15458 and Primary Care Availability in McClellandtown**

Creating a comprehensive "COPD Score" for physicians in ZIP Code 15458 and evaluating primary care availability in McClellandtown, Pennsylvania, requires a multi-faceted approach. This score would ideally assess a physician's ability to effectively manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and the overall accessibility of care for patients in this specific geographical area. The analysis must consider several key areas, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources.

The first step involves gathering data. This process begins with identifying all primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists practicing within ZIP Code 15458. Publicly available directories, insurance provider lists, and local hospital affiliations would serve as initial sources. The number of physicians would then be compared to the estimated population of the ZIP code to calculate a physician-to-patient ratio. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better access to care. The analysis would extend to McClellandtown, considering its proximity to 15458 and assessing the availability of PCPs within a reasonable travel distance for residents.

Next, the analysis would delve into the quality of care provided. This is a more complex endeavor. Data on physician performance is often difficult to obtain publicly. However, sources like patient reviews (e.g., Healthgrades, Vitals), and, if available, data from insurance providers on quality metrics (e.g., adherence to COPD treatment guidelines, hospital readmission rates) could provide some insights. Analyzing these metrics, while recognizing their limitations, can help identify standout practices within the area. A practice demonstrating consistently high patient satisfaction scores and positive health outcomes would contribute positively to the overall score.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability of physicians to offer virtual consultations and remote monitoring services can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in rural areas. The analysis would investigate which practices in 15458 and serving McClellandtown offer telemedicine options. This includes assessing the types of telemedicine services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs) and the availability of these services to COPD patients. Practices with robust telemedicine programs would receive a higher score, recognizing their commitment to patient convenience and accessibility.

The integration of mental health resources is essential for effective COPD management. COPD often co-exists with anxiety and depression, and addressing these mental health concerns is critical for improving patient outcomes. The analysis would explore the availability of mental health services within the practices in the area. This includes whether the practice has integrated behavioral health specialists, offers referrals to mental health professionals, or provides educational resources on mental health. Practices that actively address the mental health needs of their COPD patients would be given higher scores, reflecting a more holistic approach to patient care.

Specific data points would be assigned weighted values to calculate the final "COPD Score." For example, a lower physician-to-patient ratio might contribute 20% to the score. Patient satisfaction scores might account for 25%, telemedicine adoption for 20%, and the integration of mental health resources for 15%. The remaining 20% could be allocated to other factors like the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation programs, access to smoking cessation resources, and the practice's participation in clinical trials related to COPD. The exact weighting of each factor would depend on the specific priorities of the analysis.

In the context of McClellandtown, the analysis would focus on the accessibility of primary care. This involves assessing the distance to the nearest PCPs, the availability of transportation options for patients, and the ability of these PCPs to provide comprehensive COPD care. The "COPD Score" for McClellandtown would reflect the overall availability and quality of primary care resources for residents with COPD.

For example, a practice within 15458 that demonstrates a low physician-to-patient ratio, high patient satisfaction, offers comprehensive telemedicine services, and has integrated mental health resources would receive a high "COPD Score." Conversely, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine options, and no mental health integration would receive a lower score. McClellandtown's score would reflect the overall access to these resources.

The limitations of such an analysis must be acknowledged. Data availability is a major constraint. The absence of comprehensive, publicly available data on physician performance and resource availability would necessitate the use of proxy measures and estimations. Furthermore, patient experiences and individual needs vary, and a numerical score cannot fully capture the nuances of healthcare quality.

Despite these limitations, this type of analysis can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in a specific geographic area. It can help patients make informed decisions about their care and identify areas where improvements are needed. The "COPD Score" framework, even in a hypothetical scenario, can be a useful tool for evaluating and improving COPD care.

This hypothetical analysis highlights the importance of a data-driven approach to assessing healthcare quality and accessibility. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive data collection, rigorous analysis, and a focus on patient-centered care.

To explore the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and gain a visual understanding of physician locations, patient demographics, and other relevant data points within ZIP Code 15458 and the surrounding area, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a valuable visual context for understanding the "COPD Score" analysis and identifying areas of need.