The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 15490, White, Pennsylvania is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15490 has some form of health insurance. 43.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.59 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15490 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 86 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15490. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 90 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 469 health care providers accessible to residents in 15490, White, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15490, White, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 27 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 56 |
Travel Score | 44 |
15490 | White | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on evaluating the quality of care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) within the context of primary care availability for the White population in ZIP Code 15490, a region that warrants detailed examination. This involves a comprehensive assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, identification of standout practices, evaluation of telemedicine adoption, and examination of available mental health resources. The aim is to provide a clear understanding of the healthcare landscape and pinpoint areas for improvement.
Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio in 15490 is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can potentially lead to delayed diagnoses, longer wait times for appointments, and reduced access to specialized care, all of which can adversely affect COPD management. Conversely, a higher ratio may suggest greater access, though the quality of care is not solely dependent on this metric. The data must be disaggregated to specifically analyze primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists, as these specialists are central to COPD care. The availability of specialists relative to the prevalence of COPD within the White population in 15490 is a vital indicator. Publicly available data from sources such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards can provide initial insights, but these often require further refinement to capture the nuances of local healthcare dynamics.
Identifying standout practices within the ZIP Code is essential. These practices often demonstrate superior patient outcomes, employ innovative treatment strategies, and provide excellent patient experiences. Researching these practices involves examining patient reviews, analyzing publicly available performance data (if available), and potentially conducting interviews with patients and healthcare professionals. Key factors to consider include the practice's approach to COPD management, its use of evidence-based guidelines, its patient education programs, and its integration of mental health services. Practices that prioritize preventative care, such as smoking cessation programs and regular pulmonary function testing, are particularly valuable. The analysis should also consider the practice’s commitment to cultural competency, ensuring that care is delivered in a way that is sensitive to the needs of the White population in the area.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in assessing COPD care quality. Telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. It allows for remote consultations, medication management, and monitoring of symptoms. The analysis should evaluate the extent to which practices in 15490 have adopted telemedicine, including the types of services offered, the technology used, and the patient satisfaction levels. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their COPD care model should be recognized as exemplary. The analysis must also consider the availability of reliable internet access in the area, as this is a prerequisite for successful telemedicine implementation.
The integration of mental health resources into COPD care is often overlooked, but it is crucial. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The analysis should assess the availability of mental health services within the practices in 15490, including access to psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, such as on-site counseling or referrals to mental health specialists, are more likely to provide comprehensive care. The analysis should also consider the availability of support groups and educational programs that address the mental health needs of COPD patients.
A comprehensive analysis of the healthcare landscape in 15490 must also consider the specific needs of the White population. This involves assessing the cultural sensitivity of healthcare providers, the availability of resources in the preferred languages of the population, and the understanding of cultural beliefs and practices related to health. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to cultural competency are better equipped to provide effective and equitable care. The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that may impact access to care, such as income levels, insurance coverage, and transportation options.
The COPD Score, derived from this analysis, should reflect a composite of these factors. It should not be a simple numerical score, but rather a detailed assessment that highlights strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. The score should be accompanied by specific recommendations for healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients. For example, recommendations might include expanding telemedicine services, increasing access to mental health resources, or implementing patient education programs.
The data gathered and analyzed should be visualized using a powerful mapping tool. CartoChrome maps offer the ability to visually represent the distribution of physicians, the location of healthcare facilities, and the availability of resources. This visualization can enhance the understanding of the healthcare landscape in 15490 and identify areas where resources are lacking. By using CartoChrome maps, the information can be presented in an accessible and engaging format, making it easier for stakeholders to understand the challenges and opportunities related to COPD care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like