The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 15723, Chambersville, Pennsylvania is 32 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15723 has some form of health insurance. 100.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15723 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15723. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 12 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,564 health care providers accessible to residents in 15723, Chambersville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15723, Chambersville, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 26 |
---|---|
People Score | 59 |
Provider Score | 32 |
Hospital Score | 56 |
Travel Score | 10 |
15723 | Chambersville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a COPD Score assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) within the 15723 ZIP code, centered on Chambersville, Pennsylvania. This score reflects the availability and quality of care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, practice features, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources. This is not a formal medical evaluation.
The 15723 ZIP code, predominantly rural, presents inherent challenges to healthcare access. Population density is lower than urban centers, which can lead to longer travel times for patients seeking care. This geographic reality significantly impacts the COPD Score. The score will be based on assumptions due to the limited publicly available data.
Physician-to-patient ratios form a critical foundation for assessing care accessibility. A higher ratio (more patients per physician) can indicate potential strain on the existing medical infrastructure. Assuming a reasonable patient-to-physician ratio for primary care in this area, a score reflecting the availability of PCPs would be established. This would be based on the assumption of a standard ratio for the region.
The size and capacity of the medical practices within the 15723 ZIP code are crucial. Larger practices, with more resources, are often better equipped to manage complex chronic conditions like COPD. These practices may have dedicated respiratory therapists, pulmonary function testing capabilities, and established patient education programs. The presence of these resources directly impacts the COPD Score.
Standout practices, if identified, would significantly boost the overall score. These practices might demonstrate a commitment to COPD management through proactive patient outreach, advanced diagnostic capabilities, or strong patient education initiatives. Identifying these practices requires detailed research, and the score will be based on the assumption of the presence of such practices.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, providing patients with remote consultations, medication management, and educational resources. The extent of telemedicine integration within the practices in the 15723 ZIP code significantly influences the COPD Score. Practices actively using telemedicine would receive a higher score.
The integration of mental health resources into COPD care is another critical factor. COPD often co-exists with anxiety, depression, and other mental health conditions. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, either in-house or through partnerships, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. The availability of such resources directly impacts the COPD Score.
The COPD Score for the 15723 ZIP code, based on these factors, would be a composite measure. The score would be an estimate based on the assumptions made, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of COPD care. This is not a precise scientific measurement.
Primary care availability in Chambersville, specifically, is a crucial component of the overall assessment. Chambersville, as the focal point of the ZIP code, would be the area where patients are most likely to seek primary care. The number of PCPs serving Chambersville, the practice sizes, and the resources available within those practices would be key determinants of the score.
The assumed presence of a few well-equipped practices, with some telemedicine capabilities and a limited integration of mental health resources, would lead to a moderate COPD Score. The rural nature of the area and the potential for a higher patient-to-physician ratio would likely limit the score.
The score is designed to be a relative measure, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care landscape in the 15723 ZIP code. It is not a definitive judgment of any specific practice.
The impact of the score on patients is substantial. A higher score suggests better access to care, improved disease management, and a higher quality of life for COPD patients. A lower score highlights areas where improvements are needed, such as increasing physician availability, expanding telemedicine services, and integrating mental health resources.
The methodology used to derive the COPD Score includes several assumptions. The accuracy of the score depends on the validity of these assumptions. A more comprehensive analysis would require detailed data collection, including physician surveys, patient interviews, and a review of practice resources.
The score is not a static measure. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. New practices may open, existing practices may expand their services, and telemedicine adoption may increase. The COPD Score would need to be updated periodically to reflect these changes.
The score is intended to be a tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Patients can use the score to make informed decisions about their care. Healthcare providers can use the score to identify areas for improvement. Policymakers can use the score to allocate resources and develop healthcare initiatives.
The limitations of the score must be acknowledged. The score is based on limited data and assumptions. It does not capture the full complexity of COPD care. It is intended to be a starting point for further investigation and analysis.
The overall assessment highlights the importance of primary care in managing COPD. Primary care physicians are often the first point of contact for patients with COPD. They play a crucial role in diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of the disease.
The availability of mental health resources is critical for COPD patients. The prevalence of anxiety and depression among COPD patients is high. Integrated mental health services can improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Telemedicine offers a promising solution for improving access to care in rural areas. Telemedicine can reduce travel times, improve patient convenience, and expand access to specialists.
The COPD Score is a valuable tool for assessing the quality and accessibility of COPD care in the 15723 ZIP code. It highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape and provides a basis for improvement.
The analysis provides a general overview of the situation. More specific and detailed information would require direct investigation.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in the 15723 ZIP code and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, practice sizes, and other relevant data, enabling a more informed assessment of COPD care availability.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like