The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 15962, Wilmore, Pennsylvania is 87 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.49 percent of the residents in 15962 has some form of health insurance. 61.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.78 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15962 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 105 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15962. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 49 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 898 health care providers accessible to residents in 15962, Wilmore, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15962, Wilmore, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 90 |
---|---|
People Score | 64 |
Provider Score | 87 |
Hospital Score | 63 |
Travel Score | 47 |
15962 | Wilmore | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below assesses the quality of COPD care and primary care accessibility within the ZIP code 15962, specifically focusing on the Wilmore area. This evaluation considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, ultimately aiming to provide a COPD Score ranking.
The cornerstone of effective COPD management is access to qualified primary care physicians (PCPs). In Wilmore, the availability of PCPs directly impacts the COPD Score. A high physician-to-patient ratio, meaning fewer patients per doctor, generally translates to better access and more individualized care. Conversely, a low ratio might indicate longer wait times for appointments and potentially less time dedicated to each patient's needs. The specific physician-to-patient ratio in 15962 requires data analysis. However, we can infer some preliminary observations.
Wilmore, being a relatively small community, may face challenges in attracting and retaining a large pool of PCPs. This could potentially lead to a lower physician-to-patient ratio compared to more urban areas. This scarcity could impact the COPD Score negatively, as timely access to medical professionals is crucial for COPD patients.
The quality of primary care practices significantly influences the COPD Score. Standout practices, those that prioritize patient-centered care and possess specialized knowledge in respiratory conditions, can elevate the score. These practices often employ certified respiratory therapists, offer pulmonary function testing (PFT) onsite, and actively participate in COPD education programs.
Conversely, practices lacking these resources or exhibiting a high turnover rate among physicians might receive a lower score. The analysis would investigate the presence of these features within the practices serving Wilmore. The availability of specialized equipment, like spirometers for measuring lung function, is a critical indicator of quality.
Telemedicine has become increasingly important in healthcare, especially for managing chronic conditions like COPD. Its adoption in Wilmore directly impacts the COPD Score. Practices utilizing telemedicine platforms for virtual consultations, remote monitoring of patients' vital signs, and medication management can improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in remote areas.
The integration of telemedicine can also facilitate more frequent check-ins and proactive management of COPD symptoms, potentially reducing hospitalizations and improving the overall quality of life. Practices that are slow to adopt telemedicine may receive a lower COPD Score. The analysis would evaluate the extent of telemedicine adoption among the primary care providers in the area.
Mental health support is an often-overlooked but critical aspect of COPD care. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this and offer access to mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, or support groups, contribute to a higher COPD Score.
The analysis would assess the availability of these resources within the primary care practices in Wilmore. Practices that integrate mental health services into their COPD management plans demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. The presence of mental health professionals within the practice or readily available referrals to mental health specialists are important indicators.
The COPD Score is not solely determined by physician availability or practice characteristics. It also considers the overall healthcare infrastructure within the community. The presence of a local hospital with a dedicated pulmonary department, readily accessible emergency services, and community-based support groups for COPD patients can significantly improve the score.
The analysis would examine the resources available within the broader healthcare ecosystem in Wilmore and the surrounding areas. The proximity of a hospital equipped to handle COPD exacerbations is a crucial factor. The availability of respiratory rehabilitation programs and educational resources for patients also plays a role.
The evaluation of these factors would result in a COPD Score ranking for the primary care providers in 15962. This ranking would provide a valuable tool for patients seeking care for COPD, helping them identify practices that are best equipped to meet their needs. The score would be a composite measure, reflecting the relative strengths and weaknesses of each practice in terms of COPD management.
The analysis would also provide insights into the overall state of primary care accessibility in Wilmore. It would highlight areas where improvements are needed, such as increasing the physician-to-patient ratio, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding mental health support services. This information can be used to advocate for better healthcare resources and improve the quality of life for COPD patients in the community.
The analysis would employ a scoring system based on the factors discussed above. Each factor would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. The final COPD Score would be a numerical representation of the practice's ability to provide comprehensive COPD care. The higher the score, the better the practice is equipped to manage COPD.
The analysis would not only evaluate the practices but also provide recommendations for improvement. These recommendations could include suggestions for practices to enhance their services, such as implementing telemedicine, integrating mental health support, or investing in specialized equipment. The goal is to improve the quality of care for COPD patients in Wilmore.
The final COPD Score would be a dynamic measure, subject to change as practices improve their services or as the healthcare landscape evolves. The analysis would be updated periodically to reflect these changes and provide patients with the most current information. The goal is to provide an evolving assessment of COPD care in Wilmore.
The analysis would also consider the patient experience. Patient satisfaction surveys and feedback would be incorporated into the scoring process. This ensures that the COPD Score reflects not only the technical aspects of care but also the patient's perception of the quality of service.
The analysis would be conducted using publicly available data, physician directories, and practice websites. Data privacy would be maintained throughout the process. The analysis would adhere to all relevant ethical guidelines and regulations.
The primary care availability in Wilmore and the surrounding areas is a critical factor in the COPD Score. The analysis would assess the geographic distribution of PCPs and the ease with which patients can access care. Factors such as transportation options and the availability of after-hours care would be considered.
The analysis would also consider the cost of care. The affordability of medical services is a significant factor in patient access. The analysis would examine the insurance plans accepted by the practices and the availability of financial assistance programs.
The final COPD Score would be a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of COPD care in Wilmore. It would be a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. The analysis would contribute to improving the health outcomes of COPD patients in the community.
The analysis would provide a detailed overview of the strengths and weaknesses of each practice. This information can be used to inform patients' choices and to guide healthcare providers in their efforts to improve their services. The goal is to empower patients and to promote better COPD care.
The COPD Score would be a valuable tool for healthcare providers to benchmark their performance and to identify areas for improvement. The analysis would provide actionable insights that can be used to enhance the quality of care. The goal is to foster a culture of continuous improvement in COPD management.
The analysis would promote transparency and accountability in healthcare. By providing a clear and objective assessment of COPD care, the analysis would help to hold healthcare providers accountable for their performance. The goal is to improve the overall quality of healthcare in Wilmore.
To visualize the results of this comprehensive analysis, and to gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources in Wilmore and beyond, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Their platform can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing you to easily identify areas with high and low COPD scores and to assess the accessibility of primary care services.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like