16136, Koppel, Pennsylvania COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16136, Koppel, Pennsylvania is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.59 percent of the residents in 16136 has some form of health insurance. 48.91 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.41 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16136 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 184 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16136. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 157 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,321 health care providers accessible to residents in 16136, Koppel, Pennsylvania.

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16136 & Primary Care in Koppel

Analyzing the availability and quality of COPD-related care within ZIP Code 16136, specifically focusing on the borough of Koppel, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis aims to provide a 'COPD Score' assessment, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, practice performance, telemedicine integration, and mental health support for COPD patients. The absence of publically available comprehensive datasets makes an exact numerical score impossible. However, a qualitative assessment, drawing on available information and reasonable assumptions, can provide valuable insights.

The foundation of any COPD care assessment lies in the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Koppel, a small borough, likely faces challenges in PCP access. A limited number of PCPs translates to a potentially unfavorable physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio is crucial. A high ratio, meaning a large number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, less time dedicated to each patient during visits, and a reduced ability for physicians to proactively manage chronic conditions like COPD. This scarcity can be a significant impediment to timely diagnosis, treatment initiation, and ongoing disease management.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices is critical. Assessing this involves looking at factors like patient reviews, accreditation status (e.g., from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance), and the availability of specialized COPD-related services within the practice. Do practices offer spirometry testing on-site? Are they actively involved in patient education programs related to COPD management, including smoking cessation support? Do they have dedicated nurses or respiratory therapists who specialize in COPD care? These elements contribute to a practice's ability to effectively address the complex needs of COPD patients.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial component of the COPD Score. Telemedicine offers significant advantages for COPD patients, particularly in rural or underserved areas like Koppel. Remote monitoring of vital signs, virtual check-in appointments, and access to specialist consultations via telehealth can improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital readmissions. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies, offering virtual visits and remote monitoring capabilities, would receive a higher score in this area. The availability of secure video conferencing platforms, remote monitoring devices, and patient portals are all indicators of a practice's commitment to telehealth.

The often-overlooked aspect of mental health support is particularly important for COPD patients. COPD can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this and offer access to mental health services, either in-house or through referral networks, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups specializing in the needs of individuals living with chronic respiratory illnesses. The presence of these resources significantly improves the overall COPD Score.

Identifying 'standout practices' requires further investigation. Publicly available information on individual practice performance is often limited. However, researching practices within the broader area (e.g., in nearby towns or cities) can offer insights. Look for practices that have strong patient reviews, are actively involved in community outreach related to COPD awareness, and demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based care. Practices that have been recognized for quality of care by regional or national organizations would also be considered standout performers.

The COPD Score for doctors in ZIP Code 16136, specifically focusing on Koppel, is likely to be impacted by the limited resources available in a rural setting. The potential for a low physician-to-patient ratio, the importance of primary care quality, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support are all factors that need to be carefully considered. The absence of readily available data makes a definitive score impossible. However, based on the likely challenges, the overall score is likely to be moderate, with the potential for improvement through increased access to primary care, investment in telehealth infrastructure, and a greater focus on mental health support for COPD patients.

The challenges are not insurmountable. Collaborative efforts between local healthcare providers, community organizations, and regional healthcare systems can help improve the situation. This includes initiatives to recruit and retain PCPs, expand access to telemedicine services, and establish robust referral networks for mental health support. Furthermore, patient education and awareness campaigns can empower individuals to proactively manage their COPD and seek timely medical attention.

The effective assessment and improvement of COPD care require a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape. While this analysis provides a qualitative overview, a deeper dive into specific practice performance, physician availability, and resource allocation is essential. This is where tools like CartoChrome maps can be invaluable. CartoChrome maps offer the ability to visualize geographic data related to healthcare, including physician locations, hospital locations, and patient demographics. This visualization can help identify areas with limited access to care, pinpoint gaps in service, and facilitate the development of targeted interventions.

To gain a more granular understanding of the healthcare landscape in Koppel and the surrounding area, and to identify specific practices and resources, explore the power of spatial data analysis with CartoChrome maps.