The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16233, Leeper, Pennsylvania is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.92 percent of the residents in 16233 has some form of health insurance. 37.26 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.52 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16233 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 206 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16233. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 274 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 407 health care providers accessible to residents in 16233, Leeper, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16233, Leeper, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 27 |
---|---|
People Score | 38 |
Provider Score | 36 |
Hospital Score | 59 |
Travel Score | 25 |
16233 | Leeper | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the landscape of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) care in and around Leeper, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16233) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis, a 'COPD Score' assessment, will evaluate the availability and quality of primary care, focusing on factors crucial for COPD management. These include physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the resources available to patients in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of COPD care rests heavily on the accessibility of primary care physicians (PCPs). Leeper, a rural community, likely faces challenges common to such areas, including a potentially lower physician-to-patient ratio compared to urban centers. This ratio is a critical indicator. A higher ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnoses or inadequate management of COPD. Determining the exact physician-to-patient ratio for 16233 requires data collection from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and local hospital systems. This data, when analyzed, will provide a crucial benchmark for understanding the accessibility of care.
Identifying standout practices within the area is essential. These practices often demonstrate best practices in COPD management. They might have dedicated respiratory therapists, offer pulmonary rehabilitation programs, or actively participate in clinical trials. To identify these practices, a thorough review of online reviews, patient testimonials, and physician referrals is necessary. Furthermore, examining the practice's approach to COPD management, including the use of spirometry testing, medication management protocols, and patient education materials, is crucial. Practices that proactively engage in patient education and support groups are particularly valuable. Their commitment to patient empowerment significantly improves outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is another vital factor in the COPD Score. Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, offers significant advantages, particularly in rural areas. It can reduce travel burdens for patients, improve access to specialists, and facilitate remote monitoring of vital signs. Practices that utilize telemedicine for COPD management, such as virtual check-ins, medication refills, and remote monitoring of oxygen saturation levels, deserve a higher score. The availability of telemedicine can significantly improve the quality of life for COPD patients by allowing them to receive care without the need to travel long distances.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in COPD care, but they are critically important. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health services into their COPD management programs are highly commendable. This could involve on-site therapists, referrals to mental health specialists, or the use of telehealth platforms for mental health counseling. The availability of these resources is a strong indicator of a holistic approach to patient care.
The COPD Score for doctors in 16233 should consider the availability of these resources. The score will be a composite, weighing each factor according to its importance. Physician-to-patient ratios will be heavily weighted, as access to a PCP is the foundation of care. The presence of standout practices will also be a significant factor, as these practices often set the standard for quality care. Telemedicine adoption will be considered, with practices that fully utilize telemedicine scoring higher. Finally, the availability of mental health resources will be a crucial component, reflecting the importance of holistic care.
The evaluation process for each physician or practice will require a detailed investigation. This includes gathering information from various sources, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data, insurance provider networks, and local health departments. Patient feedback, collected through surveys or interviews, will also be valuable. This comprehensive approach will help to create a fair and accurate COPD Score for each physician and practice.
The final COPD Score will be a valuable tool for patients, allowing them to make informed decisions about their healthcare. It will also provide valuable insights for healthcare providers, highlighting areas where they can improve their services. The score can be used to benchmark performance, identify best practices, and ultimately, improve the quality of care for COPD patients in Leeper and the surrounding areas.
The analysis of the availability of primary care in Leeper, Pennsylvania, is not merely an academic exercise. It has direct implications for the health and well-being of the community. The COPD Score, when implemented effectively, can serve as a catalyst for positive change. It can encourage healthcare providers to adopt best practices, invest in telemedicine, and integrate mental health services. It can also empower patients to become active participants in their own care.
The challenges of providing adequate healthcare in rural areas are well-documented. However, with careful planning, strategic investments, and a commitment to innovation, these challenges can be overcome. The COPD Score is a step in the right direction, providing a framework for assessing and improving the quality of COPD care in Leeper and similar communities.
To visualize and explore the geographic distribution of primary care physicians, telemedicine availability, and mental health resources in Leeper (16233) and surrounding areas, we recommend using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that can help you visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like