The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16256, Smicksburg, Pennsylvania is 28 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 44.57 percent of the residents in 16256 has some form of health insurance. 25.42 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 24.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16256 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,077 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16256. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 166 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 76 health care providers accessible to residents in 16256, Smicksburg, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16256, Smicksburg, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 5 |
---|---|
People Score | 21 |
Provider Score | 28 |
Hospital Score | 40 |
Travel Score | 12 |
16256 | Smicksburg | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Smicksburg, PA (ZIP Code 16256)
Analyzing the availability and quality of COPD care within Smicksburg, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16256) requires a multifaceted approach, considering not just the number of physicians but also the resources available to manage this chronic respiratory disease. This analysis will delve into the physician landscape, primary care accessibility, telemedicine adoption, and mental health support, ultimately providing a COPD Score assessment.
The first critical factor is the physician-to-patient ratio. Smicksburg, a rural community, likely faces challenges in physician density. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Census Bureau, when combined with information on physician specialties (specifically pulmonologists and primary care physicians with expertise in respiratory care), would paint a picture of access. A low physician-to-patient ratio, especially for specialists, would negatively impact the COPD Score, indicating potential difficulties in timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management. This is particularly crucial for COPD patients, who require regular monitoring and access to specialists for exacerbations.
Primary care availability is a cornerstone of COPD management. Primary care physicians (PCPs) often serve as the first point of contact for patients experiencing respiratory symptoms. Their ability to diagnose, initiate treatment plans, and coordinate care with specialists is paramount. The analysis needs to identify the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and surrounding areas, along with their patient load. Furthermore, the analysis must examine the availability of same-day appointments, extended office hours, and weekend coverage. Limited access to primary care would significantly lower the COPD Score, as it could delay diagnosis and hinder the proactive management of the disease.
Identifying standout practices is essential. Certain practices might excel in COPD care, offering comprehensive services and demonstrating a commitment to patient well-being. This requires researching practices within the area, assessing their use of evidence-based guidelines, and evaluating their patient outcomes. Key indicators include the availability of pulmonary function testing (PFT) in-house, access to respiratory therapists, and participation in disease management programs. Practices that actively monitor patients, provide patient education, and facilitate access to pulmonary rehabilitation programs would receive higher marks, contributing to a better COPD Score.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical component. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care, particularly in rural areas like Smicksburg. The analysis should assess the availability of telehealth services for COPD patients, including virtual consultations with PCPs and pulmonologists, remote monitoring of vital signs, and virtual respiratory therapy sessions. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience, reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, and potentially improve patient adherence to treatment plans. Higher telemedicine adoption rates would positively influence the COPD Score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in COPD care, yet they are critically important. COPD can significantly impact a patient’s mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The analysis must evaluate the availability of mental health services within the community, including access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Practices that screen patients for mental health issues, offer on-site counseling, or have established referral pathways to mental health providers would demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. A lack of mental health support would negatively affect the COPD Score, as it could hinder a patient’s ability to cope with the disease and adhere to their treatment plan.
The COPD Score, therefore, is not a simple numerical value but a composite assessment. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, primary care accessibility, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. Each factor would be weighted based on its importance in COPD management. A low score would indicate significant challenges in accessing and receiving adequate COPD care, while a high score would reflect a community with robust resources and a proactive approach to patient well-being.
For Smicksburg, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16256), the COPD Score is likely to be impacted by the rural nature of the community. The analysis would likely reveal a lower physician-to-patient ratio, potentially limited access to specialists, and the need for increased telemedicine adoption to overcome geographical barriers. The availability of primary care and mental health resources will be crucial factors determining the overall score.
To gain a more granular understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and patient needs, a visual representation is invaluable. Analyzing this data with geospatial tools, such as those offered by CartoChrome maps, would allow for a more comprehensive assessment. CartoChrome maps can visually represent physician locations, patient demographics, and other relevant data points, allowing for a clear understanding of the challenges and opportunities within the community.
Explore the power of visual data. Discover how CartoChrome maps can transform your understanding of healthcare access and resource allocation in Smicksburg and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like